Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation-based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA. METHODS: A radiological and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT-aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT-aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT-aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT-aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland-Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT-aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native soft tissue laxities while limiting alignment extremes that risk prosthetic failure. However, there is no consensus where restricted boundaries (RB) should be set. This study aims to determine the proportion of limbs in which constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) would be restored with various RB scenarios, to inform decision making in rKA TKA. METHODS: The mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on radiographs of 500 normal knees. Incrementally wider RBs were then applied. The proportion of limbs within each increment was determined when RBs were applied only to HKA, or to HKA, LDFA and MPTA together. In addition, the proportion of limbs within published adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) and rKA protocols were determined, as well as those within one, two and three standard deviations of the means for HKA, LDFA and MPTA. RESULTS: When restrictions to mHKA alone were applied, 74.0% and 97.8% of knees were captured with boundaries of ± 3° and ± 6° respectively. However, when the same boundaries to HKA were also applied to MPTA and LDFA, 36.2% and 91.0% of knees were captured respectively, highlighting the limiting effect that JLO has on restoration of normal knee phenotypes. When comparing previously published boundaries, aMA of 0° ± 3° captured 36.2%; rKA of 0° ± 3 for HKA and 85° to 95° for LDFA/MPTA captured 67.8%; rKA of - 5° to 4° HKA and 86°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 63%; and rKA of - 6° to + 3° for HKA and 84°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 85.4%. CONCLUSION: The greatest proportions of normal knee phenotypes were captured with boundaries that were centred around population means for HKA and JLO. Further, these findings demonstrate that restricting the JLO has a significant limiting influence on restoration of normal knee phenotypes beyond that of restricting HKA alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Interobserver agreement of sensor-derived compartmental pressure measurements in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Sensor-guided compartmental pressure measurements are becoming increasingly utilized in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to objectively confirm intraoperative knee balance. We aimed to determine agreement of pressure measurements between two observers when performing sensor-guided TKA with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS). METHODS: One-hundred and eighteen consecutive patients undergoing 130 TKAs were analysed. Femoral and tibial trial implants were inserted prior to performing knee balancing. We compared the reliability of sensor pressure compartmental measurements between two observers at 10, 45 and 90° of flexion using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plots). RESULTS: The interobserver agreement between sensor pressure measurements was excellent at 10° of knee flexion, with ICCs of 0.93 and 0.91 in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively (P < 0.001). At 45°, medial and lateral compartment ICCs were 0.91 and 0.76, respectively (P < 0.001). At 90°, the ICC was 0.88 medially and 0.76 laterally (P < 0.001). Although the agreement decreased at higher knee flexion, it remained good to excellent. The 95% limits of agreement at each angle were all within 20 psi and 11 psi for the medial and lateral compartments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent interobserver agreement of sensor pressure measurements at 10° of knee flexion with computer-assisted TKA. Interobserver agreement decreased slightly as knee flexion angles increased, particularly in the lateral compartment. It is likely that interobserver agreement and hence reliability of sensor pressure measurements in TKA has some dependence on accurate angular positioning of the knee.