Prevalence of anxiety and depression risk during the prepartum period in the different groups of women and responses from the Italian National Health Service.

BACKGROUND: Specific screening for anxiety and depression in pregnant women is important to identify those at risk and to provide timely intervention. The aims of the study were: 1) to compare the risk of anxiety and depression in four groups of pregnant women belonging to four types of healthcare centers distinguished by the level of risk: at low-risk; at high-risk for an obstetric reason; at high-risk for fetal anomalies; at high-risk for psychiatric conditions and 2) to identify the response that the National Health Service offers to women positively screened for anxiety and depression. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 2801 pregnant women, cared for by National Health Service, divided into four groups: 1) low-risk pregnancy (N.=1970); 2) high-risk pregnancy for an obstetric reason (N.=218); 3) high-risk for fetal anomalies (N.=505); and 4) high-risk for psychiatric conditions (N.=108). Participants were screened using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, the General Anxiety Disorder, and sociodemographic, anamnestic, and clinic questionnaires. RESULTS: 28.9% of participants obtained an EPDS Score ≥9 and 17.1% a GAD-7 Score ≥8. The group at high-risk for fetal anomalies presented the highest prevalence of anxiety (29.3%) and depression (49.1%) while the group at low risk presented the lowest prevalence of anxiety (13%) and depression (24.6%). The groups at risk for obstetric reasons presented an intermediate prevalence. Psychiatric conditions constituted a higher risk for anxiety than depression. Counselling is recommended for about 70% of women at risk for anxiety and depression. Moreover, about 15% of women positive for screening were initiated into psychotherapy and about 1.5% into pharmacotherapy. 15% of women positive for screening were referred to other specialists. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlined the relevance of a prompt response by the National Health Service to mental health needs, especially in the risk conditions related to obstetric and/or fetal anomalies and psychopathology.

Couples undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model of dyadic adjustment, attachment, and body-image avoidance.

The aim is to assess the commonalities and interdependence referred to body-image avoidance among 118 couples newly introduced to first-level assisted reproductive techniques. Results showed non-clinical functioning levels, and partners showed a correlated, yet low, dyadic adjustment. The couple-effect was modeled through an Actor Partner Interdependence Model. For both partners, dyadic adjustment's actor-effect associates with body-image avoidance. Moreover, psychological symptoms' actor-effect associate to body-image avoidance, resulting significantly more influential than the partner-effect. Only for males, alexithymia's actor-effect was significant. To conclude, partners' functioning is quite specular yet not interdependent, as they do not show a couple-as-a-unit modality of functioning. Clinical implications are discussed.