Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn ; 14(1): 31-36, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373545

ABSTRACT

Background: Septate uterus is a benign congenital malformation and represents the most common uterine anomaly in women with poor reproductive outcome. Objectives: To review the available scientific data concerning the biological context of the intrauterine septum and the association with poor reproductive outcome, the best methods for diagnosis and treatment. Materials and Methods: From July 2020 to October 2020, we searched for relevant free full text articles in PubMed, written in English, and published from the 1st of January 2000 to 31st of July 2020. Main outcome measures: Association of the pathophysiology of septate uterus with poor reproductive outcome, evaluation of the different classification systems, the accuracy of diagnostic methods and the efficacy of the available treatment options. Results: 259 articles were screened, and 22 articles were finally included in our study. Many theories regarding the pathophysiology of this congenital anomaly and its' association with reproductive problems have been proposed along the recent decades. Combination of diagnostic methods should be used to avoid misclassification of this congenital anomaly. Conclusions: Lack of uniformity in the different classification systems makes the diagnosis of septate uterus challenging as there is no universally accepted definition. Data regarding the reproductive outcome of women with septate uterus are still limited, thus recommendations regarding optimal treatment of these women are biased. What is new?: According to new insights regarding the pathophysiology of the uterine septum, differences in the underlying embryological defects are associated with changes in the histological composition and vascularisation of septa, as well as in clinical significance.

2.
Hum Reprod ; 34(9): 1770-1777, 2019 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31384921

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Are oocyte maturation rates different among 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg triptorelin used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) undergoing ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER: A dose of 0.1 mg triptorelin results in similar oocyte maturation rates compared to higher doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg in patients at high risk for OHSS undergoing ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The GnRH agonist triptorelin is widely used instead of hCG for triggering final oocyte maturation, in order to eliminate the risk of severe OHSS in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. However, limited data are currently available regarding its optimal dose use for this purpose in patients at high risk for OHSS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective study was performed between November 2015 and July 2017 in 131 infertile patients at high risk for severe OHSS undergoing ovarian stimulation for ICSI. High risk for severe OHSS was defined as the presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm in diameter on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Patients received 0.1 (n = 42), 0.2 (n = 46) or 0.4 mg (n = 43) triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Hormonal evaluation of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) was carried out on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, 8 and 36 hours post triggering and 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after triptorelin administration. During this period, all patients were assessed for symptoms and signs indicative of severe OHSS development. Primary outcome measure was oocyte maturation rate, defined as the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes divided by the number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes retrieved per patient. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were observed among the 0.1 mg, the 0.2 mg and the 0.4 mg groups. Regarding the primary outcome measure, no differences were observed in oocyte maturation rate among the three groups compared [82.6% (17.8%) versus 83.3% (18.8%) versus 85.1% (17.2%), respectively, P = 0.686].In addition, no significant differences were present among the 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg groups, regarding the number of mature (MII) oocytes [21 (13) versus 20 (6) versus 20 (11), respectively; P = 0.582], the number of oocytes retrieved [25.5 (13) versus 24.5 (11) versus 23 (12), respectively; P = 0.452], oocyte retrieval rate [81.0% (17.7%) versus 76.5% (23.5%) versus 75.0% (22.5), respectively; P = 0.088], the number of fertilized (two pronuclei) oocytes [12.5 (9) versus 14.5 (7) versus 14.0 (8), respectively; P = 0.985], fertilization rate [71.7% (22%) versus 77.1% (19.1%) versus 76.6% (23.3%), respectively; P = 0.525] and duration of luteal phase [7 (1) versus 8 (2) versus 7 (1) days, respectively; P = 0.632]. Moreover, no significant differences were present among the three triptorelin groups regarding serum levels of LH, FSH, E2 and PRG at any of the time points assessed following triggering of final oocyte maturation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a retrospective study, and although there were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups compared, the presence of bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that triggering final oocyte maturation with a lower (0.1 mg) or a higher dose (0.4 mg) of triptorelin, as compared to the most commonly used dose of 0.2 mg, does not confer any benefit in terms of oocyte maturation rate in patients at high risk for severe OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.


Subject(s)
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques/methods , Oocytes/drug effects , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Triptorelin Pamoate/adverse effects , Triptorelin Pamoate/pharmacology , Adult , Estradiol/blood , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Oocytes/growth & development , Oogenesis/drug effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Progesterone/blood , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Triptorelin Pamoate/administration & dosage , Young Adult
3.
BJOG ; 126(10): 1200, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173458
4.
Case Rep Womens Health ; 21: e00101, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30906695

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Postmenopausal labial fusion constitutes a severe form of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. This report describes the management of a series of women with complete labial fusion (CLF) and pseudo-incontinence. METHODS: This is a seven-year retrospective chart review in a urogynaecology unit of a tertiary hospital of all who patients presented with CLF and lower urinary tract symptoms, predominantly continuous urinary incontinence. All patients had a standardized surgical intervention and were followed up in the outpatient department. RESULTS: Seven patients (mean age 72.9 ±â€¯12.1 years) with CLF and associated pseudo-incontinence were identified from the hospital archives. All patients had an uneventful surgical restoration of the labial anatomy, the pseudo-incontinence had resolved immediately postoperatively in all cases, and no recurrence of the labial agglutination had occurred after an average follow-up of 2.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this report we present a case series of seven postmenopausal patients with CLF and urinary pseudo-incontinence who underwent successful surgical management with good anatomical results and complete resolution of urinary symptoms.

5.
Hum Reprod ; 34(3): 491-505, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30689865

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Does the outcome of the comparison of live birth rates between the first frozen embryo transfer (ET) (in a freeze-only cycles strategy, i.e. frozen ET group) and a fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET group) differ considering the type of ovarian response? SUMMARY ANSWER: Α significantly higher probability of live birth is present in high, but not normal, responders, after the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy as compared to a fresh ET. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It has been hypothesised that freezing all good embryos in a fresh in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle and deferring embryo transfer in subsequent cycles may provide a more physiological endometrial environment for embryo implantation when compared to a fresh ET. However, currently, three relevant meta-analyses have been published with conflicting results, while none of them has taken into consideration the type of ovarian response. Recently, the publication of additional, large relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with different types of ovarian response makes possible the comparative evaluation of the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) versus fresh ET, considering the type of ovarian response. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify RCTs comparing the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET. The main outcome was live birth, while secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We identified eight eligible RCTs, including 5265 patients, which evaluated the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy versus a fresh ET either in high responders (n = 4) or in normal responders (n = 4). No relevant RCTs were present in poor responders. Meta-analysis of weighted data using fixed and random effects model was performed. Results are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Eligible RCTs were published between 2011 and 2018. Four RCTs (n = 3255 patients) compared the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET in normal responders and four RCTs (n = 2010 patients) did the comparison in high responders. In high responders, a significantly higher probability of live birth was observed in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.31; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; three studies; n = 3398 patients). However the probability of live birth was not significantly different between the frozen ET group and the fresh ET group in normal responders (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90-1.41; random effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 77%; three studies; n = 1608 patients). The risk of moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group both in high (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.37; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: not applicable; a single study; n = 1508 patients) and normal responders (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.80; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; two studies; n = 2939 patients). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies, regarding ovarian stimulation protocols and the triggering signal used for inducing final oocyte maturation as well as the cryopreservation methods, while the quality of evidence was poor for the live birth rate in high responders. Moreover, the analysis did not apply a standard for determining 'high' or 'normal' responders since the type of ovarian response followed the characterisation of populations as reported by the authors of the eligible studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A freeze-only cycle strategy should be the preferred option in high responders since it enhances the probability of live birth, while reducing the chance of moderate/severe OHSS. In normal responders, the same strategy could be applied, in the interest of patient safety or clinic convenience, without compromising the chances of live birth. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used and there were no competing interests. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099389.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/methods , Embryo Transfer/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Live Birth , Ovary/physiology , Ovulation Induction/methods , Abortion, Spontaneous , Birth Rate , Female , Fertilization , Freezing , Humans , Oocytes/physiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Probability , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
8.
Hum Reprod Update ; 7(2): 161-74, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11284660

ABSTRACT

Uterine malformations consist of a group of miscellaneous congenital anomalies of the female genital system. Their mean prevalence in the general population and in the population of fertile women is approximately 4.3%, in infertile patients approximately 3.5% and in patients with recurrent pregnancy losses approximately 13%. Septate uterus is the commonest uterine anomaly with a mean incidence of approximately 35% followed by bicornuate uterus (approximately 25%) and arcuate uterus (approximately 20%). It seems that malformed uterus and especially septate uterus is not an infertility factor in itself. However, it may have a part in the delayed natural conception of women with mainly secondary infertility. On the other hand, patients with uterine malformations seem to have an impaired pregnancy outcome even as early as their first pregnancy. Overall term delivery rates in patients with untreated uterine malformations are only approximately 50% and obstetric complications are more frequent. Unicornuate and didelphys uterus have term delivery rates of approximately 45%, and the pregnancy outcome of patients with untreated bicornuate and septate uterus is also poor with term delivery rates of only approximately 40%. Arcuate uterus is associated with a slightly better but still impaired pregnancy outcome with term delivery rates of approximately 65%. Women who have undergone hysteroscopic septum resection and have been reported in the different series comprise a highly selected group of symptomatic patients with term delivery and live birth rates of only approximately 5%. Hysteroscopic treatment seems to restore an almost normal prognosis for the outcome of their pregnancies with term delivery rates of approximately 75% and live birth rates of approximately 85%. It seems, therefore, that hysteroscopic septum resection can be applied as a therapeutic procedure in cases of symptomatic patients but also as a prophylactic procedure in asymptomatic patients in order to improve their chances for a successful delivery.


Subject(s)
Hysteroscopy , Uterus/abnormalities , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy Outcome , Uterus/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...