Indications for and outcome in patients with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in a nurse-based training programme: results of the Austrian WCD Registry.

BACKGROUND: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator is a treatment option for patients at temporarily high risk of sudden cardiac death or in whom implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator is temporarily not possible. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide real-world data on patients receiving this therapy in a nurse-based wearable cardioverter-defibrillator training programme. METHODS: A registry including all patients prescribed with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in Austria between 2010 and 2016. Overall, 448 patients received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in 48 centres. Patients received structured nurse-based wearable cardioverter-defibrillator educational initial training followed by remote monitoring. RESULTS: Main indications were: severe non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (21%); recent myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention (20%); and stable coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting (14%). Eleven patients (2.5%) received 22 appropriate wearable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Two patients (0.4%) received three inappropriate shocks. The risk of sudden cardiac death varied between different aetiologies. Eight out of 11 (73%) patients received their first wearable cardioverter-defibrillator shock within 30 days. The main reasons for termination of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy were implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (55.5%) and improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction to more than 35% (33%). CONCLUSION: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator is an effective and safe treatment option in patients at either transiently elevated risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation or mandated postponed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, with a 2.5% shock rate over a median 54 days wearable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment period. However, both the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator shock rate and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation rate vary widely depending on the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator indication. Nurse-based wearable cardioverter-defibrillator training is associated with high patient adherence, with a median wearing duration per day of 23.5 (1-24) hours.

In-Hospital Outcome Comparing Bivalirudin to Heparin in Real-World Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Randomized controlled trials have shown conflicting results regarding the outcome of bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of patients receiving heparin or bivalirudin in a real-world setting of PPCI: 7,023 consecutive patients enrolled in the Austrian Acute PCI Registry were included between January 2010 and December 2014. Patients were classified according to the peri-interventional anticoagulation regimen receiving heparin (n = 6430) or bivalirudin (n = 593) with or without GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). In-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 2.25, p = 0.72), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.14, p = 0.59), net adverse clinical events (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.77, p = 0.99), and TIMI non-coronary artery bypass graft-related major bleeding (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.86, p = 0.25) were not significantly different between the groups. However, we detected potential effect modifications of anticoagulants on mortality by GPIs (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.07, p = 0.06) and access site (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.03, p = 0.06) favoring bivalirudin in femoral access. In conclusion, this large real-world cohort of PPCI, heparin-based anticoagulation showed similar results of short-term mortality compared with bivalirudin. We observed a potential effect modification by additional GPI use and access favoring bivalirudin over heparin in femoral, but not radial, access.

Baseline vectorcardiography as a predictor of invasively determined acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Identifying potential responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be sometimes difficult and time consuming. Searching for a simple method, we chose vectorcardiography (VCG) for our study. The aim was to evaluate whether a VCG parameter can be used to predict invasively measured acute hemodynamic changes after CRT onset. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline VCG data were prospectively recorded just before initiation of CRT in a series of 126 consecutive patients (♂74 %, DCMP 60 %, ICMP 40 %, NYHA class III 100 %, QRS width 161 ± 27 ms, LV-EF 25 ± 6.5 %) prior to implantation at our specialized center. The time interval (TI) between the maximum vector and the end of the vector loop (initial description by Koglek W.) was correlated with acute hemodynamic change after CRT onset. Positive response to CRT was defined as an increase in dp/dt max >10 % or pulse pressure >5 %. According to these invasive hemodynamic parameters, 25 patients (20 %) were defined as non-responders. Using ROC analysis, the threshold value of the TI for responders was found to be 64 ms. TI is a predictor of acute hemodynamic response with a sensitivity of 96 %, a specificity of 76 %, a positive predictive value of 94 %, and a negative predictive value of 79 %. More non-responders are identified by TI than by using conventional QRS width in the 12-lead surface ECG. CONCLUSION: TI is a new method of evaluation based on baseline VCG analysis. It may be a useful diagnostic test for predicting acute hemodynamic response to CRT.

Clopidogrel pre-treatment is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS Pre-treatment with clopidogrel results in a reduction of ischaemic events in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Data on upstream clopidogrel in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether clopidogrel loading before arrival at the PCI centre may result in an improved outcome of primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS In a multicentre registry of acute PCI, 5955 patients undergoing primary PCI in Austria between January 2005 and December 2009 were prospectively enrolled. The patients consisted of two groups, a clopidogrel pre-treatment group (n = 1635 patients) receiving clopidogrel before arrival at the PCI centre and a peri-interventional clopidogrel group (n = 4320 patients) receiving clopidogrel at a later stage. Multiple logistic regression analysis including major confounding factors stratified by the participating centres was applied to investigate the effect of pre-treatment with clopidogrel on the in-hospital mortality. Additionally, two subgroups, with or without the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy in the catheterization laboratory, were analysed. On univariate analysis, clopidogrel pre-treatment was associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality (3.4 vs. 6.1%, P< 0.01) after primary PCI. On multivariate analysis, clopidogrel pre-treatment remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.99; P =0.048], especially in patients receiving additional GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy in the catheterization laboratory (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.83; P =0.01). CONCLUSION Clopidogrel pre-treatment before arrival at the PCI centre is associated with reduced mortality in a real world setting of primary PCI. These results strongly support the recommendation of clopidogrel treatment 'as soon as possible' in patients with STEMI undergoing pimary PCI.

Primary percutaneous intervention of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Austria: Results from the Austrian acute PCI registry 2005-2007.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Implementation of networks of care and registries providing continuous quality assessment are key components for optimal management in patients with STEMI. AIM: To analyze procedural success and in-hospital outcome of interventional therapy of STEMI in Austria. METHODS: We evaluated a total number of 4016 consecutive STEMI patients registered in the first three years after implementation of the Austrian acute PCI registry in January 2005. RESULTS: The rate of PPCI as an indication for acute coronary intervention increased from 83.5% in 2005 to 92.4% in 2007 (P < 0.0001). During this period the median door-to-balloon time decreased from 60.0 (40.0-90.0) min to 53.0 (30.0-80.0) min (P = 0.012). The percentage of patients receiving adequate adjunctive antithrombotic therapy with ASA/heparin and clopidogrel significantly increased (78.8-85.1% and 67.8-90.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.6% in rescue PCI, 6.4% in facilitated PCI and 5.1% in PPCI. On multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock (OR: 20.21, 95% CI: 12.21-33.44, P < 0.001), resuscitation (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.47-4.69, P = 0.01), age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and angiographic success (OR: 5.93, 95% CI: 3.33-10.57, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: Continuous nationwide efforts to establish regional networks for STEMI treatment in the years 2005-2007 led to a decrease in door-to-balloon time, improved adjunctive antithrombotic therapy and an in-hospital mortality of 5%. Results of interventional STEMI treatment in Austria are in accordance with current guidelines and with other contemporary registries.

Effectiveness of respiratory-sinus-arrhythmia biofeedback on state-anxiety in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

AIM: This study is a report of a study conducted to evaluate the value of psychological assistance including respiratory-sinus-arrhythmia biofeedback training in its ability to reduce the level of anxiety in patients undergoing coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography has been reported to cause anxiety and emotional stress. METHODS: Between March 2004 and January 2005, 212 patients undergoing routine elective coronary angiography for the evaluation of stable coronary artery disease were randomized into two groups. In the psychological support group (n = 106) a structured psychological conversation and respiratory-sinus-arrhythmia biofeedback training were offered prior to coronary angiography. In the control group (n = 106) standard care and information was provided without psychological support. State-anxiety was measured (scale 20-80) 1 day prior to and after coronary angiography, along with blood pressure and heart rate. FINDINGS: Prior to coronary angiography, state-anxiety was 54.8 +/- 11.5 (mean +/- SD) in the control group and 54.8 +/- 12.6 in the psychological support group. After coronary angiography, state-anxiety was 47.9 +/- 18.5 in the control group but 28.3 +/- 12.5 in the psychological support group (Wilcoxon rank sum test W = 7272, P < 0.001). Blood pressure was statistically significantly lower in the psychological support group prior to the intervention and the day after coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: Psychological support including respiratory-sinus-arrhythmia biofeedback is an effective and simple tool that could be used by nurses to reduce state-anxiety and emotional stress in patients undergoing coronary angiography.