Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of using conventional productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs) with or without other natural PETs on the growth performance, carcass traits, and environmental impacts of feedlot cattle. A total of 768 cross-bred yearling steers (499 ±â€…28.6 kg; n = 384) and heifers (390 ±â€…34.9 kg; n = 384) were offered a barley grain-based basal diet and divided into implanted or non-implanted groups. Steers were then allocated to diets that contained either: (i) no additive (control); natural feed additives including (ii) fibrolytic enzymes (Enz), (iii) essential oil (Oleo), (iv) direct-fed microbial (DFM), (v) DFM + Enz + Oleo combination; conventional feed additives including (vi) Conv (monensin, tylosin, and beta-adrenergic agonists [ßAA]); or Conv with natural feed additives including (vii) Conv + DFM + Enz; (viii) Conv + DFM + Enz + Oleo. Heifers received one of the first three dietary treatments or the following: (iv) probiotic (Citr); (v) Oleo + Citr; (vi) Melengesterol acetate (MGA) + Oleo + ßAA; (vii) Conv (monensin, tylosin, ßAA, and MGA); or (viii) Conv + Oleo (ConvOleo). Data were used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions, as well as land and water use. Implant and Conv-treated cattle exhibited improvements in growth and carcass traits as compared to the other treatments (P < 0.05). Improvements in the performance of Conv-cattle illustrated that replacing conventional feed additives with natural feed additives would increase both the land and water required to satisfy the feed demand of steers and heifers by 7.9% and 10.5%, respectively. Further, GHG emission intensity for steers and heifers increased by 5.8% and 6.7%, and NH3 emission intensity by 4.3% and 6.7%, respectively. Eliminating the use of implants in cattle increased both land and water use by 14.6% and 19.5%, GHG emission intensity by 10.5% and 15.8%, and NH3 emission intensity by 3.4% and 11.0% for heifers and steers, respectively. These results demonstrate that the use of conventional PETs increases animal performance while reducing the environmental impacts of beef production. Restricting use would increase the environmental footprint of beef produced for both domestic and international markets.

Association between computer-aided lung auscultation and treatment failure risk in calves treated for respiratory disease.

The use of computer-aided lung auscultation (CALA, Whisper Veterinary Stethoscope; Merck Animal Health, Madison, New Jersey, USA) is a relatively new approach to assist in confirming the diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). For this prospective cohort study at 1 feedlot in the United States, a CALA score was generated for 2726 feeder cattle (calf-fed Holsteins and mixed-breed beef animals) at the time of the first BRD diagnosis and treatment. All cattle were treated according to the same BRD protocol prescribed for that facility and the protocol was not influenced by the CALA score. Data were collected for 120 d after enrollment. In this study, the risk of BRD retreatment and the risk of BRD mortality were each significantly (P < 0.05) associated with the CALA score at the time of first BRD diagnosis and treatment, and those risks increased (numerically and in some cases statistically) as the CALA score increased.

Association entre l'auscultation pulmonaire assistée par ordinateur et le risque d'échec du traitement chez les veaux traités pour une maladie respiratoire. L'utilisation de l'auscultation pulmonaire assistée par ordinateur (CALA, Whisper Veterinary Stethoscope; Merck Animal Health, Madison, New Jersey, USA) est une approche relativement nouvelle pour aider à confirmer le diagnostic de maladie respiratoire bovine (BRD). Pour cette étude de cohorte prospective dans un parc d'engraissement aux États-Unis, un score CALA a été généré pour 2726 bovins d'engraissement (veau Holstein et bovins de race mixte) au moment du premier diagnostic et traitement de la BRD. Tous les bovins ont été traités selon le même protocole BRD prescrit pour ce site et le protocole n'a pas été influencé par le score CALA. Les données ont été collectées pendant 120 jours après l'inscription. Dans cette étude, le risque de retraitement pour BRD et le risque de mortalité associée au BRD étaient chacun significativement (P < 0,05) associés au score CALA au moment du premier diagnostic et traitement BRD, et ces risques augmentaient (numériquement et dans certains cas statistiquement) à mesure que le score CALA augmentait.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).