Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

The predictive value of Killip classification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well established. We performed a pooled analysis of 2,654 patients with AMI enrolled in 3 primary angioplasty trials. Of these, 2,305 patients were class I, 302 were class II, and 47 were class III (class IV patients were excluded). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine if Killip class at admission was a predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Higher Killip classification was associated with greater in-hospital (2.4%, 7%, and 19% for class I, II, and III, respectively) and 6-month mortality (4%, 10%, and 28% for class I, II, and III, respectively). Higher Killip class was associated with increased age (p <0.001), history of diabetes (p <0.02), lower systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate at presentation (p <0.0001 for both), more 3-vessel disease (p <0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p <0.0001), and higher peak creatine phosphokinase (p <0.0001). With each increasing Killip class, there was an increased need for an intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (p <0.001) and greater incidence of renal failure (p <0.001), major arrhythmia (p <0.001), and major bleeding (p <0.001). After controlling for potential confounding variables, Killip classification remained a multivariate predictor of mortality at both time end points. Killip classification at hospital admission remains a simple and useful independent predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with AMI who are undergoing primary PCI.

Usefulness of intravenous enoxaparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris.

This pilot study was designed to determine whether the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, could be used for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to provide antithrombotic effects without the full systemic anticoagulation that occurs with the use of unfractionated heparin. Sixty patients were randomized to receive intravenous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg bolus dose) or unfractionated heparin at the time of coronary intervention. Laboratory testing was performed at baseline, 5 minutes, and 4 hours after study drug to test if a single bolus dose of intravenous enoxaparin can consistently achieve therapeutic antithrombotic effect, thus eliminating the need for multiple doses of heparin and closely monitoring levels of anticoagulation during PCI. Thirty percent of patients who received unfractionated heparin required a second bolus of intravenous heparin to achieve the target-activated clotting time of 300 seconds before PCI. Enoxaparin showed antithrombotic properties comparable to that of unfractionated heparin as measured by anti-Xa levels, with less inhibition of thrombin (factor IIa) at the time points measured (p <0.0001). Angioplasty success rates, in-hospital ischemia, bleeding, and vascular complications were similar in both groups. Thus, intravenous enoxaparin has predictable and effective antithrombotic effects during elective PCI. Although the level of anticoagulation attained with enoxaparin is significantly lower than that after unfractionated heparin, no increase in ischemic complications were noted. The use of a single bolus of intravenous enoxaparin, without the need for measuring the activated clotting time or titrating heparin anticoagulation, has the potential for simplifying the performance and perhaps enhancing the safety of PCI.

Local intramural heparin delivery during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Local PAMI Pilot Study.

The feasibility and safety of local heparin delivery during acute infarct angioplasty was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter, 120-patient series. Angioplasty was performed using standard techniques, after which heparin (4,000 U) was delivered locally; 25% of patients received stents. Procedural success was reported in 98% of patients; 6.7% of patients suffered death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, or stroke during the index hospitalization. The 6-month target vessel revascularization rate was 12.5%. Local heparin therapy with provisional stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients is safe, feasible, associated with a low rate of infarct artery revascularization at 6 months, and may potentially eliminate the need for systemic heparin following the procedure.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) study evaluated the hypothesis that primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with subsequent discharge from the hospital 3 days later, is safe and cost-effective in low risk patients. BACKGROUND: In low risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI), few data exist regarding the need for intensive care and noninvasive testing or the appropriate length of hospital stay. METHODS: Patients with acute MI underwent emergency catheterization with primary PTCA when appropriate. Low risk patients (age <70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction >45%, one- or two-vessel disease, successful PTCA, no persistent arrhythmias) were randomized to receive accelerated care (admission to a nonintensive care unit and day 3 hospital discharge without noninvasive testing [n = 237] or traditional care [n = 234]). RESULTS: Patients who received accelerated care had similar in-hospital outcomes but were discharged 3 days earlier (4.2+/-2.3 vs. 7.1+/-4.7 days, p = 0.0001) and had lower hospital costs ($9,658+/-5,287 vs. $11,604+/-6,125 p = 0.002) than the patients who received traditional care. At 6 months, accelerated and traditional care groups had a similar rate of mortality (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), unstable ischemia (10.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.52), reinfarction (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), stroke (0.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07), congestive heart failure (4.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.85) or their combined occurrence (15.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.49). The study was designed to detect a 10% difference in event rates; at 6 months, only a 2.3% difference was measured between groups, indicating an actual power of 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of low risk patients with MI allowed safe omission of the intensive care phase and noninvasive testing, and a day 3 hospital discharge strategy, resulting in substantial cost savings.

Opinions of pharmacy, medicine, and pharmaceutical industry leaders about hypothetical therapeutic-interchange legislation.

The beliefs of representatives of organized pharmacy and medicine and the pharmaceutical industry about the effect of hypothetical therapeutic-interchange legislation on various health-care issues were studied. Questionnaires designed to gauge respondents' beliefs about the impact of two hypothetical bills (A and B) concerning selection of therapeutic alternates by pharmacists were mailed to the directors of 307 organizations in April 1986. Bill A would permit pharmacists in any setting to select therapeutic alternates. Bill B would permit therapeutic interchange by pharmacists within organized health-care settings in accordance with guidelines approved by physicians. Issues addressed included the efficient delivery of health care, professional liability, interprofessional and pharmacist-patient relationships, and competition and profitability in the pharmaceutical industry. The response rate was 63% (194 usable responses). Bill A received some support from representatives of state pharmaceutical associations only. However, bill B was supported by respondents from state pharmaceutical associations, state hospital pharmacy societies, boards of pharmacy, and generic manufacturers. Respondents from medical associations and member companies of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA) were concerned about the impact of the hypothetical bills on the quality of drug therapy and the efficiency of health-care delivery. Respondents from medical associations also were concerned about the impact of the bills on physician liability. The responses from the medical associations and the PMA-member companies suggest that a program should be developed to educate physicians about the process used by pharmacists and physicians to develop guidelines for therapeutic interchange in various practice settings.

Prescribing authority for pharmacists as viewed by organized pharmacy, organized medicine, and the pharmaceutical industry.

This study identifies attitudes of organized pharmacy, organized medicine, and the pharmaceutical industry about prescribing authority for pharmacists. A questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a legislative bill permitting a pharmacist in an organized health care setting to initiate or modify drug therapy was mailed to state pharmacy associations, state hospital pharmacy associations, state pharmacy boards, state medical associations, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA)-member manufacturers, and non-PMA-member generic manufacturers. Responses from 194 of the 307 invited organizations were used. The six organization types viewed the impact of the legislative bill differently (p less than 0.05). Hospital pharmacy associations and boards of pharmacy, to a lesser extent, supported the legislative bill; non-PMA-member generic manufacturers and state pharmacy associations were relatively neutral. The medical associations and the PMA-member companies opposed the passage of the bill. Furthermore, medical associations believed that the bill would not be passed in the majority of states in the next five years.