Conventional CT versus Dedicated CT Angiography in DIEP Flap Planning: A Feasibility Study.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is used with increasing frequency in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Preoperative mapping with CT angiography (CTa) is crucial in reducing surgical complications and optimizing surgical techniques. Our study's goal was to investigate the accuracy of conventional CT (cCT), performed during disease staging, compared to CTa in preoperative DIEP flap planning. In this retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled patients scheduled for mastectomy and DIEP flap breast reconstruction, subjected to cCT within 24 months after CTa. We included 35 patients in the study. cCT accuracy was 95% (CI 0.80-0.98) in assessing the three largest perforators, 100% (CI 0.89-100) in assessing the dominant perforator, 93% (CI 0.71-0.94) in assessing the perforator intramuscular course, and 90.6% (CI 0.79-0.98) in assessing superficial venous communications. Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) caliber was recognized in 90% of cases (CI 0.84-0.99), with an excellent assessment of superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) integrity (96% of cases, CI 0.84-0.99), and a lower accuracy in the evaluation of deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) branching type (85% of cases, CI 0.69-0.93). The mean X-ray dose spared would have been 788 ± 255 mGy/cm. Our study shows that cCT is as accurate as CTa in DIEP flap surgery planning.

Correct determination of the enhancement curve is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis using the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI.

OBJECTIVES: the Kaiser score is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool to improve breast MRI interpretation. Contrast enhancement kinetics are the second most important diagnostic criterion, thus defining the curve type plays a crucial role in Kaiser score assessment. We investigate whether the timepoint used to determine the initial enhancement (earlyor peak) for the signal-intensity time curve analysis affects the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score. METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective, single-center study included 70 consecutives histologically verified breast MRI cases. Two off-site breast radiologists independently read all examinations using the Kaiser score, assessing the initial enhancement using three approaches: -first (1 st), second (2nd) and peak (maximum) of either 1 st or 2nd post-contrast timepoints. The initial enhancement was then compared to the last timepoint (delayed enhancement) to determine the curve type. Visual assessment of curve types was used for this study. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Kaiser score reading results using the peak enhancement of either the first or second timepoint performed significantly better than the other approaches (P < 0.05, respectively) and specifically achieved higher sensitivity. Diagnostic accuracy (AUC area under the curve) ranged between 85.4 % and 91.6 %, without significant differences between the two readers (P < 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score is significantly influenced by how the initial enhancement timepoint is determined. Peak enhancement should be used as initial timepoint to avoid pitfalls due to timing or physiological differences.

Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo.

Breast conserving surgery has become the standard of care and is more commonly performed than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, with recent studies showing equivalent survival and lower morbidity. Accurate preoperative lesion localization is mandatory to obtain adequate oncological and cosmetic results. Image guidance assures the precision requested for this purpose. This review provides a summary of all techniques currently available, ranging from the classic wire positioning to the newer magnetic seed localization. We describe the procedures and equipment necessary for each method, outlining the advantages and disadvantages, with a focus on the cost-effective preoperative skin tattoo technique performed at our centre. Breast surgeons and radiologists have to consider ongoing technological developments in order to assess the best localization method for each individual patient and clinical setting.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging prediction of large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyse the influence of tumor volume/breast volume ratio (TV/BV ratio) measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other factors on surgeons' choice between large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery (LVOS) versus mastectomy (M) in patients with large sized tumors. Secondly, we investigate the predictive value of TV/BV ratio and other possible predictors for cosmetic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 80 MRI examinations performed on 77 breast cancer patients who underwent M (58 breasts, 72.5%) or LVOS (22 breasts, 27.5%) at our institution between January 2016 and December 2017. The TV and BV measurements were performed by a semiautomated analysis and the TV/BV ratio was calculated by dividing TV by BV in cm3 and multiplying it by 1,000. Cosmetic result was determined by an expert panel assessment of postoperative photographs. RESULTS: Median TV/BV was significantly higher in the M group (44,8 IQR 17,3-93,6) than in the LVOS group (17,5 IQR 11,7-57,5) (P=0.002). Multifocal/multicentric disease (P=0.005), lower degree of breast ptosis (P<0.0001) and unfavourable tumor location (P=0.024) are significantly more frequent in the M group. After multivariable linear regression, the independent predictors for cosmetic result were: unfavourable tumor location (OR 6.637 95% CI 1.564- 28.172 P=0.010) and a higher TV/BV ratio (OR 4.907 95% CI 1.461-16.478 P=0.010) CONCLUSION: Preoperative evaluation of TV/BV ratio, tumor location and tumor multifocality/multicentricity could improve treatment decision making (LVOS versus M) in breast cancer patient eligible for both options. Increasing TV/BV ratio and unfavourable tumor location are adversely affecting cosmetic result. KEY WORDS: Breast cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mastectomy, Large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery, Tumor volume/breast volume.

External Validation of a Risk Stratification Score for B3 Breast Lesions Detected at Ultrasound Core Needle Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to externally validate the feasibility and robustness of a risk-stratification score for B3 lesions based on clinical, pathological, and radiological data for improved clinical decision making. METHODS: 129 consecutive histologically confirmed B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound-guided biopsy at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Patient- and lesion-related variables were independently assessed by two blinded breast radiologists (R1, R2), by assigning each feature a score from 0 to 2 (maximum sum-score of 5). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated at two different thresholds (≥1 and 2). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. The diagnostic accuracy of the score to distinguish benign from malignant B3 lesions was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Surgery was performed on 117/129 (90.6%) lesions and 11 of these 117 (9.4%) lesions were malignant. No cancers were found at follow-up of at least 24 months. Area under the ROC-curve was 0.736 (R1) to 0.747 (R2), with no significant difference between the two readers (p = 0.5015). Using a threshold of ≥1, a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 90%/90% (R1/R2), 39%/38% (R1/R2), 11%/12% (R1/R2) and 97%/98% (R1/R2) were identified. Both readers classified 47 lesions with a score ≤1 (low risk of associated malignancy). Of these, only one malignant lesion was underdiagnosed (Ductal carcinoma in situ-G1). CONCLUSIONS: In our external validation, the score showed a high negative predictive value and has the potential to reduce unnecessary surgeries or re-biopsies for ultrasound-detected B3-lesions by up to 39%.

Morphological and Semiquantitative Kinetic Analysis on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectly investigate the association between different breast cancer (BC) immunohistochemical subtypes and morphological and semiquantitative kinetic analysis on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed before surgery treatment. Specifically we aimed to assess MRI features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to the other BC subtypes (nTNBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergone to breast MRI and then diagnosed with BC by core-needle biopsy were included. The MRI morphological and kinetic features were studied. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used, as appropriate. RESULTS: Seventy-five BC patients were considered, 30 patients included in TNBC Group and 45 patients included in nTNBC Group. We found in TNBC Group a greater mean lesion size (P <0.001), a rim enhancement imaging (P=0.003), and a higher intratumoral signal intensity on T2-weighted images (P=0.03) with respect to nTNBC Group. We noticed that TNBC patients presented a lower grade of BPE when compared to the nTBC Group (P< 0.02). TNBC Group showed lower EPeak values (P=0.003) and higher SER values (P=0.02) with respect to the nTNBC Group. In addition, stratifying kinetics parameters according to the tumor grade, the TNBC Group presented higher tumor grade (G3) (P< 0.005) and this subgroup had higher SER values when compared to TNBCs showing a lower tumor grade (G1 and G2) (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: After validation by large-scale studies, the morphological and semiquantitative kinetic analysis on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI may help in the pretreatment risk stratification of patients with TNBC and in evidence-based clinical decision support.