Controlling micropollutants in tertiary municipal wastewater by O3/H2O2, granular biofiltration and UV254/H2O2 for potable reuse applications.

A comprehensive pilot study was carried out to experimentally assess the potential of newly developed treatment trains integrating two-stage AOPs and biofiltration to reach potable reuse water quality standards from municipal wastewater. The processes consisted of a two-stage AOPs with (carbon or limestone) biofiltration, the first AOP (O3/H2O2) serving as pre-treatment to biofiltration and the second AOP (UV254/H2O2) serving as post-biofiltration finishing step to ensure advanced disinfection. A comprehensive monitoring campaign was put in place resulting from the combination of targeted, non-targeted and suspect screening measurements. It was found that 13 organic micropollutants were detected from a list of 219 suspects although at ng/L level only. For the treatment conditions piloted in this study (O3 = 13 ±â€¯0.5 mg/L, H2O2 = 11 ±â€¯0.4 mg/L for the O3/H2O2 process, and UV = 410 ±â€¯63.5 mJ/cm2, H2O2 = 5 mg/l for the UV254/H2O2 process), it was possible to estimate the overall removal efficacy for each unit process, which was found to follow this order: RO (99%)  > BAC (87%) > O3-H2O2 (78%)  > BAL (67%)  > UV/H2O2 (43%)  > AOP contact chamber (19%)  > UF(0%), with the treatment train integrating two AOPs and granular biofiltration with activated carbon (O3/H2O2 + BAC + UV254/H2O2) showing superior performance with a 99% abatement in total micropollutants. No ecotoxicologically-positive response was generally observed for any of the effluent samples from the tested trains, even when pre-concentration factors up to 100-1000 times were employed to increase the sensitivity of the bioassay methods.

Positive biodiversity-productivity relationships in forests: climate matters.

While it is widely acknowledged that forest biodiversity contributes to climate change mitigation through improved carbon sequestration, conversely how climate affects tree species diversity-forest productivity relationships is still poorly understood. We combined the results of long-term experiments where forest mixtures and corresponding monocultures were compared on the same site to estimate the yield of mixed-species stands at a global scale, and its response to climatic factors. We found positive mixture effects on productivity using a meta-analysis of 126 case studies established at 60 sites spread across five continents. Overall, the productivity of mixed-species forests was 15% greater than the average of their component monocultures, and not statistically lower than the productivity of the best component monoculture. Productivity gains in mixed-species stands were not affected by tree age or stand species composition but significantly increased with local precipitation. The results should guide better use of tree species combinations in managed forests and suggest that increased drought severity under climate change might reduce the atmospheric carbon sequestration capacity of natural forests.