Diphenyl diselenide protects cultured MCF-7 cells against tamoxifen-induced oxidative DNA damage.

Diphenyl diselenide (DPDS) is an electrophilic reagent used in the synthesis of a variety of pharmacologically active organoselenium compounds. Studies have shown its interesting pharmacodinamic properties, as antioxidant, antimutagenic and antitumoral effects. Here we report the antigenotoxic properties of DPDS against tamoxifen (TAM)-induced oxidative DNA damage in MCF-7 cultured cell line. We determined the cytotoxicity by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage assay and evaluated oxidative DNA damage by modified comet assay employing the enzymes formamidopyrimidine DNA-glycosylase (Fpg) and endonuclease III (Endo III). Our results demonstrate that the cellular effects of DPDS appear to be complex and concentration-dependent. The present findings show that DPDS is not genotoxic (at concentrations lower than 2.0µmol/L) in MCF-7 cells, as observed in the modified comet assay. Moreover, DPDS protects against TAM-induced oxidative DNA damage, probably by its antioxidant activity, without interfering with its cytotoxicity. In this manner, the treatment with low concentrations of DPDS, a synthetic organoselenium compound, could be used as a potent antigenotoxic agent to prevent the risk of cancer induction triggered by tamoxifen hormone therapy. Thereby, more studies concerning the toxicity of DPDS and its structural derivatives are still necessary for future safe therapeutic application and development of novel chemopreventive compounds for combined therapy in breast cancer.

Relationship between oxidative stress levels and activation state on a hepatic stellate cell line.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxidative stress plays an important role in liver fibrosis. Under pathological conditions, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) undergo an activation process, developing a myofibroblast-like phenotype from the lipocyte phenotype. In this study, we determined the levels of oxidative stress and proliferation in different activation states of an experimental model of mouse HSC, the GRX cell line. These cells can be induced in vitro to display a more activated state or a quiescent phenotype. METHODS/RESULTS: We observed increased oxidative damage and higher levels of reactive oxygen species, measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive species and 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, respectively, and diminished catalase activity in activated cells. Activation decreased proliferation and increased the number of cells in G2/M. Antioxidants N-acetylcysteine and Trolox varied in their capacity to correct the oxidative stress and proliferation status. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in physiological functions of stellate cell phenotypes suggest a relationship between oxidative stress levels and activation state.

Gompertzian growth pattern correlated with phenotypic organization of colon carcinoma, malignant glioma and non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines.

In the current study we present a Gompertzian model for cell growth as a function of cell phenotype using six human tumour cell lines (A-549, NCI-H596, NCI-H520, HT-29, SW-620 and U-251). Monolayer cells in exponential growth at various densities were quantified over a week by sulforhodamine B staining assay to produce cell-growth curves. A Gompertz equation was fitted to experimental data to obtain, for each cell line, three empirical growth parameters (initial cell density, cell-growth rate and carrying capacity - the maximal cell density). A cell-shape parameter named deformation coefficient D (a morphological relationship among spreading and confluent cells) was established and compared by regression analysis with the relative growth rate parameter K described by the Gompertz equation. We have found that coefficient D is directly proportional to the growth parameter K. The fit curve significantly matches the empirical data (P < 0.05), with a correlation coefficient of 0.9152. Therefore, a transformed Gompertzian growth function was obtained accordingly to D. The degree of correlation between the Gompertzian growth parameter and the coefficient D allows a new interpretation of the growth parameter K on the basis of morphological measurements of a set of tumour cell types, supporting the idea that cell-growth kinetics can be modulated by phenotypic organization of attached cells.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin: an overview of the novel chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in humans and an important cause of cancer death. Metastatic colorectal cancer remains incurable with available systemic therapeutic options. The most active cytotoxic drug against this malignancy, the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil, was developed more than forty years ago, and as a single agent produces responses in only 10 to 15 percent of patients which in general last less than one year. Efforts to ameliorate these poor results resulted in the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination, which enhances response rates about two-fold, without, however, significantly improving survival rates. The recent emergence of a handful of new 5-fluorouracil analogues and folate antagonists, as well as the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, and the third-generation platinum compound oxaliplatin, is likely to alter this gloomy scenario. These agents are at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, both untreated and previously treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. This has led to the approval of irinotecan as second-line treatment for 5-fluorouracil-refractory disease, while the use of oxaliplatin has been suggested for patients having a defective 5-fluorouracil catabolism. Recently, FDA approved the combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for first-line treatment of advanced colon cancer. Based on the synergistic preclinical antitumor effects of some of these agents, their meaningful single-agent activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity and resistance, and only partially overlapping toxicity profiles, effective combination regimens are now being developed, which are likely to lead to a new, more hopeful era for patients suffering from advanced colorectal carcinoma

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin: an overview of the novel chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in humans and an important cause of cancer death. Metastatic colorectal cancer remains incurable with available systemic therapeutic options. The most active cytotoxic drug against this malignancy, the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil, was developed more than forty years ago, and as a single agent produces responses in only 10 to 15% of patients which in general last less than one year. Efforts to ameliorate these poor results resulted in the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination, which enhances response rates about two-fold, without, however, significantly improving survival rates. The recent emergence of a handful of new 5-fluorouracil analogues and folate antagonists, as well as the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, and the third-generation platinum compound oxaliplatin, is likely to alter this gloomy scenario. These agents are at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, both untreated and previously treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. This has led to the approval of irinotecan as second-line treatment for 5-fluorouracil-refractory disease, while the use of oxaliplatin has been suggested for patients having a defective 5-fluorouracil catabolism. Recently, FDA approved the combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for first-line treatment of advanced colon cancer. Based on the synergistic preclinical antitumor effects of some of these agents, their meaningful single-agent activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity and resistance, and only partially overlapping toxicity profiles, effective combination regimens are now being developed, which are likely to lead to a new, more hopeful era for patients suffering from advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Cellular and clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic basis for lack of efficacy of 21-day continuous topotecan in patients with untreated advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: In a phase II study, topotecan was evaluated for response and toxicity in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma at the schedule of 0.7 mg/m2/day q 21 days q 28 days. METHODS: Responses were assessed after at least 2 courses using WHO criteria, and toxicity was evaluated after each course according to the CTC-NCI standards. Between December 1995 and September 1997, 15 assessable patients (median age, 55 years; range, 36-74; median ECOG performance, 1; range, 0-3) were included in the study. All had biopsy-proven and measurable disease, a life-expectancy of at least 3 months, and normal bone marrow, liver, and renal function. None of the patients had undergone prior cytotoxic or radiation therapy, and 10 were initially treated by surgery. Twenty-five cycles were assessable for toxicity. Plasma was collected from 7 patients who had received a total of 10 cycles and was, after extraction with methanol at -20 degrees C, analyzed for total topotecan by an HPLC method. The thus determined steady-state concentrations were assessed for their capacity to affect growth and DNA integrity in the BxPC-3 human pancreatic carcinoma cell line after 21 days of continuous exposure. For these purposes, we used a sulforhodamine B staining assay, and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. RESULTS: Grades 3-4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 8, 6, 8 and 8 cycles, respectively. Other mild to moderate side effects (grades 1-2) included malaise, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, and alopecia. No objective tumor response was documented. HPLC analysis of patients' plasma showed the attainment of constant steady-state levels of 1.0+/-0.1 ng/mL during the entire infusion period. At such a concentration, topotecan did not significantly affect growth or DNA integrity in the BxPC-3 cells. Fifty percent cell growth inhibition and appreciable oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation were only evident with 21 days topotecan > or = 50 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the lack of clinical activity of 0.7 mg/m2 daily topotecan for 21 days q 28 days in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma might be partially attributed to the achievement of non-tumoricidal plasma drug concentrations.

Sequence-dependent growth inhibition and DNA damage formation by the irinotecan-5-fluorouracil combination in human colon carcinoma cell lines.

We evaluated irinotecan (CPT-11) together with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for improved cell growth inhibition with respect to that by either agent alone in the human colon carcinoma cell lines SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4. Cells were exposed for 24 h to each drug, as well as to various combinations and sequences of low, fixed doses of one drug with higher varying doses of the other, cultured for two more days in drug-free medium and then assessed for growth response with the sulphorhodamine B assay. Multiple drug effect analysis was used to evaluate the data, which were then related to the amount of DNA damage occurring in the cells which was determined by a fluorescence-enhancement assay for DNA unwinding. Cellular responses were also related to thymidylate synthase topoisomerase I and carboxyl esterase activities, which were assessed by a ligand-binding and a 3H-release assay; a DNA decatenation assay; and a spectrophotometric method, respectively. IC50 values for 5-FU alone in the SW620, HT29 and SNU-C4 cells were 15.3 +/- 0.8, 8.2 +/- 1.3 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 microM, respectively, and for CPT-11 2.0 +/- 0.9, 2.5 +/- 0.5 and 3.8 +/- 0.3 microM, respectively. The differential responses to 5-FU alone were possibly determined by differences in substrate affinity and conversion rate of thymidylate synthase (K(m) of approximately 7.5, 5.0 and 2.5 microM and V0 of approximately 800, 200 and 2400 microM/h, respectively). The comparable cellular responses to CPT-11 alone might be accounted for by the counterbalancing effects of differences in topoisomerase I (1, 1, and 1.5 arbitrary units, respectively) and carboxyl esterase activities (5055 +/- 1789, 4080 +/- 752, 1713 +/- 522 mU/mg, respectively). IC20 CPT-11 prior to 5-FU was additive to synergistic in SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 0.7 +/- 0.1). By contrast, pre-treatment with IC20 5-FU antagonised the CPT-11-mediated growth inhibition (CIs of 1.9 +/- 0.4, 1.7 +/- 1.1, 2.5 +/- 0.9, respectively). Simultaneous drug treatment did not produce more cell growth inhibition than either drug alone in the SW620 and the HT-29 cells, but was additive or antagonistic in the SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 1.1 +/- 0.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.4), depending on the ratio of the drugs. Increased DNA damage in the SW620 and HT-29 cells was only seen when IC20 CPT-11 preceded IC50 5-FU, resulting in approximately 40 and 25%, respectively, more lesions than for IC50 5-FU alone. In the SNU-C4 cells, not only such a treatment, but also simultaneous drug treatment produced (30 to 60%) more DNA damage than either drug alone. Our results show clear sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects and DNA damage formation by CPT-11 and 5-FU at combinations of low, fixed doses with higher, varying doses in cultured human colon carcinoma cells, and may be of relevance to the design of improved chemotherapeutic regimens in this disease.

Phase II study of pentosan polysulfate (PPS) in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To evaluate the response rate, toxicity and survival of patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) treated in a phase II clinical trial of pentosan polysulpate (PPS), an inhibitor of basic-fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) which blocks the growth of Kaposi's sarcoma cells both in culture and in animal models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1992 and March 1994 16 homosexual males with histopathologically confirmed AIDS-KS were accrued for this phase II clinical trial. PPS was administered at the dose of 25 mg/m2 q6 hrs at day 1, followed by 25 mg/m2 q12 hrs daily by a subcutaneous injection. The number of patients to be included in the trial was calculated according to the two-stage Gehan method. Toxicity was graded according to the NCl Common Toxicity Criteria, while responses were evaluated according to the WHO Criteria adapted for KS lesions. Patients were all homosexual males, median age 35 (27-43) years, performance status (WHO) 1 (0-2), NYU stage II-IV and prior therapy included vincristine and etoposide (3 cases), local irradiation (4 cases) and megestrol acetate (2 cases). Concomitant AZT (zidovudine) was given to 3 patients, while DDI (dideoxyinosine) was administered in one case. RESULTS: A median of 5 (3-11) weeks of therapy was administered to the patients. Pain at the injection site and low grade fever were the only toxicities observed. Drug-related effects on coagulation parameters or thrombocytopenia were not observed in the trial. One objective response (6%) was documented, which lasted for 9 weeks, while stable disease was observed in three patients, lasting for 11, 9 and 5 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first observation of objective antitumor activity with a b-FGF inhibitor in patients with AIDS-KS. Considering it novelty and the lack of significant toxicity, the authors suggest that this experimental approach deserves further evaluation.