Profile of users of drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B available through the Brazilian Public Health System.

Treatment for chronic hepatitis B in Brazil are funded by the Ministry of Health and by the state Departments of Health. Clinical protocol and therapeutic guidelines approve the use of adefovir, entecavir, interferon-α, lamivudine, and tenofovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The aim of this study was to establish the profile of users of these drugs in the state of Paraná. A cross-sectional study was conducted with patients under treatment in Paraná in August 2011. The following data were obtained: gender, hepatitis B used drug, International Classification of Diseases, and regional health unit. The monthly cost of these drugs for the public health system was also calculated. 1,093 patients registered were found, 70% male, and 2.6% co-infected with the delta agent. Tenofovir was the drug most commonly used (355 users). The highest prevalence was found in the regional health units of Pato Branco, Cascavel, Foz do Iguaçú, Francisco Beltrão, Toledo, Londrina, and Maringá. The annual cost for the public health system in Paraná was U$1,066,867. Through this study it was possible to investigate the distribution and profile of users of drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Paraná in August 2011.

Perfil dos usuários de anticitocinas disponibilizadas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde no estado do Paraná para o tratamento da artrite reumatoide / Profile of users of anticytokines off ered by the health care system in the state of Paraná for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUÇÃO: O tratamento da artrite reumatoide (AR) no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) tem financiamento do Ministério da Saúde e cofinanciamento das Secretarias Estaduais. O Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas (PCDT) para o tratamento da AR descreve o esquema terapêutico para a patologia, inclusive com as anticitocinas adalimumabe, etanercepte ou infliximabe. OBJETIVO: Traçar o perfil dos usuários de anticitocinas, medicamentos biológicos cadastrados no Sistema de Informação do Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica, gerenciado pelo Centro de Medicamentos do Paraná. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo transversal tomando como referência o mês de março de 2010. Com base em dados de dispensação, foram coletadas informações relativas a idade, gênero, regional de saúde (RS), Código Internacional de Doenças (CID) e medicamento dispensado. Calculou-se também o custo mensal com anticitocinas para o SUS. RESULTADOS: No estado do Paraná foram encontrados 923 pacientes recebendo anticitocinas, dos quais 40 por cento recebiam adalimumabe, 44 por cento etanercepte e 16 por cento infliximabe, gerando um custo mensal de R$3.403.195,59. Com relação ao CID, 55 por cento dos indivíduos apresentavam CID M05.8, 27 por cento CID M06.0, 9 por cento CID M6.8, 8 por cento CID M5.0 e 1 por cento dos indivíduos apresentava os outros CIDs relacionados com a doença. As RS do Paraná com o maior número de indivíduos em tratamento com anticitocinas foram as de Ponta Grossa, Cornélio Procópio, Londrina, Cianorte, Maringá, Irati e Campo Mourão. CONCLUSÃO: Por meio deste estudo foi possível verificar a distribuição e o perfil dos usuários de anticitocinas para o tratamento da AR no Paraná no âmbito do SUS no mês de março de 2010.

INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Unified Health Care System (SUS) offers treatment for patients with RA through federal funding (Ministry of Health) and state co-financing. The Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis describe the therapeutic regimen for the disease, including the anticytokines adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of registered users of those anticytokines, biologics registered in the Information System of the Pharmaceutical Assistance Specialized Division, managed by the Paraná State Drug Center. METHODS: A cross-sectional study regarding data from March 2010 was conducted. Based on dispensation data, information regarding the following variables were collected: age; gender; regional health care centers; International Classification of Diseases (ICD); and drug dispensed. In addition, the monthly cost with anticytokines for the SUS was calculated. RESULTS: In the state of Paraná, 923 patients on anticytokines were identified, 40 percent, 44 percent and 16 percent of whom receiving adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab, respectively. This generated a monthly cost of R$3,403,195.59. Regarding the ICD, the distribution of patients was as follows: 55 percent had ICD M05.8; 27 percent, ICD M06.0; 9 percent, ICD M6.8; 8 percent, ICD M5.0; and 1 percent had other ICDs related to the disease. The regional health care centers of the state of Paraná with the largest number of patients on anticytokines were in the following municipalities: Ponta Grossa; Cornélio Procópio; Londrina; Cianorte; Maringá; Irati; and Campo Mourão. CONCLUSION: This study assessed the distribution and profile of users of anticytokines for the rheumatoid arthritis treatment covered by the SUS in the state of Paraná, in March 2010.

Profile of users of anticytokines offered by the health care system in the state of Paraná for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Unified Health Care System (SUS) offers treatment for patients with RA through federal funding (Ministry of Health) and state co-financing. The Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis describe the therapeutic regimen for the disease, including the anticytokines adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of registered users of those anticytokines, biologics registered in the Information System of the Pharmaceutical Assistance Specialized Division, managed by the Paraná State Drug Center. METHODS: A cross-sectional study regarding data from March 2010 was conducted. Based on dispensation data, information regarding the following variables were collected: age; gender; regional health care centers; International Classification of Diseases (ICD); and drug dispensed. In addition, the monthly cost with anticytokines for the SUS was calculated. RESULTS: In the state of Paraná, 923 patients on anticytokines were identified, 40%, 44% and 16% of whom receiving adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab, respectively. This generated a monthly cost of R$3,403,195.59. Regarding the ICD, the distribution of patients was as follows: 55% had ICD M05.8; 27%, ICD M06.0; 9%, ICD M6.8; 8%, ICD M5.0; and 1% had other ICDs related to the disease. The regional health care centers of the state of Paraná with the largest number of patients on anticytokines were in the following municipalities: Ponta Grossa; Cornélio Procópio; Londrina; Cianorte; Maringá; Irati; and Campo Mourão. CONCLUSION: This study assessed the distribution and profile of users of anticytokines for the rheumatoid arthritis treatment covered by the SUS in the state of Paraná, in March 2010.

Avaliação econômica das anticitocinas adalimumabe, etanercepte e infliximabe no tratamento da artrite reumatoide no Estado do Paraná / Economic evaluation of anticitokines adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Paraná State, Brazil

Este estudo objetivou realizar uma avaliação econômica das anticitocinas adalimumabe (ADA), etanercepte (ETA) e infliximabe (IFX) para o tratamento da artrite reumatoide no Estado do Paraná, sob a perspectiva do SUS. Os dados de eficácia e segurança dos tratamentos foram buscados na literatura, e os custos foram calculados com valores gastos pelo SUS para cada um dos tratamentos. Foi elaborado o modelo de Markov para obter a relação custo-efetividade de cada tratamento. A relação custo-efetividade incremental (ICER) comparado ao tratamento padrão também foi calculada para cada anticitocina. Análises de sensibilidade e taxas de desconto foram aplicadas. Na avaliação custo-efetividade, encontraram-se custos por QALY de R$ 511.633,00, R$ 437.486,00 e R$ 657.593,00 para ADA, ETA e IFX, respectivamente. O ICER por QALY foi R$ 628.124,00, R$ 509.974,00 e R$ 965.927,00 para ADA, ETA e IFX, respectivamente. Nas análises de sensibilidade, o ETA e o ADA apresentaram valores próximos. Cabe aos gestores públicos e aos médicos prescritores a escolha adequada para cada paciente, entre os tratamentos disponibilizados.

This study aimed to perform an economic evaluation of anticytokines adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (IFX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the State of Parana, in Brazil, in the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Data on efficacy and safety of treatment were collected in literature, and costs were calculated on the amounts spent by the Government for each treatment. A Markov model was performed to get the cost-effectiveness of each treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness relationship (ICER) compared to a standard treatment was also calculated for each anticytokine. Sensitivity analysis and discount rates were applied. In assessing cost-effectiveness we found the following values (cost at R$ per QALY): 511,633.00, 437,486.00 and 657,593.00 (respectively for ADA, ETA and IFX). The ICER (R$ per QALY) was 628,124.00, 509,974.00 and 965,927.00 (for ADA, ETA and IFX). In the sensitivity analysis, ETA and ADA showed similar values. It is for public managers and physicians the choice for each patient, among the treatments available.

A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of using infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody. Published studies indicate that its use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can be efficient in providing long-term benefits. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review was performed to search for randomized clinical trials that compared intravenous administration of 3 mg/kg body weight infliximab or placebo in patients concomitantly using methotrexate. Only studies of moderate or high quality were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy (based on changes of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria) and the safety (based on serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancy, and deaths) of infliximab use. Withdrawals due to adverse events or lack of efficacy were also evaluated in both infliximab-treated and control groups. Seven trials met the inclusion criteria, comprising 2,129 patients. In the efficacy meta-analysis, a greater number of infliximab-treated patients relative to those in the placebo group achieved ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 values from 14 weeks to 2 years of treatment. For safety analysis, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Withdrawals due to adverse events were higher in the infliximab group relative to the placebo group, and withdrawals due to lack of efficacy were higher in the placebo group relative to the infliximab-treated group. This meta-analysis shows a higher efficacy of infliximab relative to placebo without significant safety differences between the infliximab-treated and control groups.