Ninety-Day Mortality of Thoracoscopic vs Open Lobectomy: A Large Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated a lower incidence of complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy compared with thoracotomy, but the data on in-hospital and 90-day mortality are inconclusive. This study analyzed whether surgical approach, VATS or thoracotomy, was related to early mortality of lobectomy in lung cancer and determined the differences between in-hospital and 90-day mortality. METHODS: Data of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lobectomy between January 1, 2007, and July 30, 2018, were retrieved from Polish National Lung Cancer Registry. Included were 31 433 patients who met all study criteria. After propensity score matching, 4946 patients in the VATS group were compared with 4946 patients in the thoracotomy group. RESULTS: Compared with thoracotomy, VATS lobectomy was related to lower in-hospital (1.5% vs 0.9%, P = .004) and 90-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.8%, P < .001). Mortality at 90 days was twice as high as in-hospital mortality in both the VATS (1.8% vs 0.9%, P < .001) and thoracotomy groups (3.4% vs 1.5%, P < .001). Postoperative complications were less common after VATS compared with thoracotomy (23.6% vs 31.8%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy is associated with lower in-hospital and 90-day mortality compared with thoracotomy and should be recommended for lung cancer treatment, if feasible. Patients should also be closely monitored after discharge from the hospital, because 90-day mortality is significant higher than in-hospital mortality.

Influence of bilateral mediastinal lymph node dissection on survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients - Randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the effect of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (BML) on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The hypothesis was: BML offers survival benefit as compared with SLND. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial including stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients was performed. All patients underwent anatomical lung resection. BML was performed during the same operation via additional cervical incision (BML group). In the control group, standard lymphadenectomy (systematic lymph node dissection, SLND) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients were randomized. No significant difference was found in the type of lung resection, blood loss, chest tube output, air leak, pain, and complications (p = 0.188-0.959). In the BML group, the operative time was longer (318 vs 223 min, p < 0.001) with higher number of removed N2 nodes (24 vs 14, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 72 % in the BML group vs 53 % in the SLND group (OR 2.33, 95 % CI 0.95-5.69, p = 0.062). Separate comparisons for different lobar locations of the tumor have shown no significant difference in survival for the right lung tumors and left upper lobe tumors. For the left lower lobe tumors, survival time was longer in the BML group (p = 0.021), and the 5-year survival rate was 90.9 % vs 37.5 %, (OR 16.66, 95 % CI 1.36-204.04, p = 0.0277). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSCLC located in the left lower lobe, bilateral lymph node dissection may be associated with better survival. The invasiveness of BML is comparable to that of SLND.

Comparison of Suction Versus Nonsuction Drainage After Lung Resections: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sufficiently large, prospective randomized trials comparing suction drainage and nonsuction drainage are lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of suction drainage and nonsuction drainage on the postoperative course in patients who have undergone lung resection. METHODS: This prospective, randomized trial included patients undergoing different types of lung resections. On the day of surgery, suction drainage at -20 cm H2O was used. On the morning of the first postoperative day, patients, in whom the pulmonary parenchyma was fully reexpanded, were randomized in the ratio of 1:1. Patients assigned to group A continued with suction drainage, while those assigned to group B underwent nonsuction drainage. RESULTS: The study included 254 patients, with 127 patients in each group. The drainage volumes were 1098.8 mL and 814.4 mL in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0014). The times to chest tube removal were 5.61 days and 4.49 days in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0014). Prolonged air leakage occurred in 5.55% of patients in group A and in 0.7% of patients in group B (p = 0.032), and asymptomatic residual air spaces were noted in 0.8% of patients in group A and 9.4% of patients in group B (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Nonsuction drainage is more effective than suction drainage with regard to drainage volume, drainage duration, and incidence of persistent air leakage. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of asymptomatic residual air spaces.

Iatrogenic injuries to the trachea and main bronchi.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries are rare. AIM: To analyse the mechanism of injury, symptoms and treatment of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of hospital records of all patients treated for main airway injuries between 1990 and 2012 was performed. RESULTS: There were 24 patients, including 21 women and 3 men. Mean time between injury and initiation of treatment was 12 hours (range: 2-48). In 16 patients the injury occurred during tracheal intubation, in 1 during rigid bronchoscopy, in 1 during rigid oesophagoscopy, in 1 during mediastinoscopy and in 5 during open surgery. Mean length of airway tear was 3.8 cm (range: 1.5-8). In 1 patient there was an injury to the cervical trachea and in the remaining 23 in the thoracic part of the airway. The treatment included repair of the membranous part of the trachea performed via right thoracotomy in 10 patients (in 1 patient additionally coverage with a pedicled intercostal muscle flap was used), a self-expanding metallic stent in 1 patient, suture of the right main bronchus and the oesophagus in 1, left upper sleeve lobectomy in 1, right upper lobectomy in 1, implantation of a silicone Y stent in 3, mini-tracheostomy in 1, and conservative treatment in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intubation is the most frequent cause of iatrogenic main airway injuries. Patients with these life-threatening complications require an individualised approach and treatment in a reference centre.

Minimally invasive strategy for mediastinal staging of patients with lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The exclusion of mediastinal involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer is essential for choosing an appropriate therapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the ability of a new minimally invasive strategy combining positron emission tomography (PET), endobronchial ultrasound needle aspiration (EBUS-NA), and endoscopic ultrasound needle aspiration (EUS-NA) to exclude mediastinal nodal metastases of non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a group of consecutive patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer, the preoperative assessment of medisastinal lymph nodes using PET, EBUS-NA, and EUS-NA. Patients in whom this minimally invasive staging protocol did not confirm mediastinal nodal metastases underwent pulmonary resection with systematic lymph node dissection. The negative predictive values of the combined EBUS-NA/EUS-NA as well as PET/EBUS -NA/EUS-NA were calculated. RESULTS: We analyzed data of 532 patients (367 men and 165 women; mean age, 65 years [range, 30-84 years]). Squamous carcinoma were diagnosed in 276 patients; adenocarcinoma, in 150; large cell carcinoma, in 22; adenosquamous carcinoma, in 40; small cell carcinoma, in 4; carcinoids, in 21; and other histological types, in 19. We performed 421 lobectomies, 55 pneumonectomies, 51 bilobectomies, and 5 sublobar resections. In all patients, systematic lymph node dissection was performed. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 22. The negative predictive value of EBUS-NA/EUS-NA was 89.8% and of PET/EBUS-NA/EUS-NA-93.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer with negative results of PET, EBUS-NA, and EUS-NA are at low risk of mediastinal nodal metastasis. In these patients, invasive mediastinal staging may not be necessary.

Optimal mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the role of TEMLA and VAMLA?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to present the current role of two techniques of extensive mediastinal dissection, in the staging of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a search for original papers published in English language, peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: According to the published evidence, definitions of VAMLA and TEMLA are given and the main elements of the operative technique are briefly presented. Extensiveness and completeness of mediastinal lymph node dissection using these techniques, their diagnostic yield as well as complications and use of hospital resources are discussed. The role of VAMLA and TEMLA in the contemporary staging of lung cancer is presented in context of other staging techniques and the current clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the evidence currently available, it may be concluded that VAMLA and TEMLA have no contemporarily use in the routine mediastinal staging of lung cancer. This is because of their invasiveness and - at least for TEMLA - high risk of complications and mortality, which renders it unacceptable as a diagnostic procedure, and also due to the development of equally accurate, but far less invasive techniques, i.e. EBUS-NA and EUS-NA.

Current evidence on transcervical mediastinal lymph nodes dissection.

In the last decade, we witnessed the development of two new, fascinating techniques of mediastinal exploration: the video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) and the transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA). During this time, several articles were published, providing a substantial body of evidence regarding different aspects of these techniques. Based on this evidence, we discuss the operative technique, its applications and results as well as questions to be answered and possible future development. The aim of this review is to provide the readers who have no personal experience with these techniques, with the key information regarding the usefulness, advantages and drawbacks of VAMLA and TEMLA.

[Tracheal stenosis due to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the exceptionaly rare location]. / Zwezenie tchawicy w przebiegu chloniaka nieziarniczego o wyjatkowo rzadkiej lokalizacji.

A case of tracheobronchiale stenosis due to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (mantle cell lymphoma) of the exceptionaly rare location, in 75 old woman is described. After the restoration of airways patency and stent implantation dyspnea was removed.

[Mesothelioma as delayed consequence of asbestos pollution]. / Miedzybloniaki oplucnej jako pózne nastepstwa zanieczyszczenia srodowiska azbestem.

Mesothelioma is a relatively rare cancer, who's course is dynamic and leads to cahexia and patient death. The relationship has been proven between its incidence and exposition to asbestos. We presented six cases of mesothelioma in patients without professional risk, which were hospitalized in the internal sections of Pulmonological wards. Unfortunately, administered treatment did not bring expected results.