Reliability of Past Medical History in a Single Hospital Participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry.

Background The GWTG (Get With The Guidelines)-Stroke registry supports clinical research and quality improvement projects that often rely on past medical history elements, the reliability of which remains largely unknown. Here, we evaluated the reliability of specific past medical history elements in a local GWTG-Stroke data set, with particular attention to calculating the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Methods and Results A single-center cohort was identified by querying the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania's GWTG IQVIA Registry Platform for patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke between January 2017 and December 2020, with a previously known history of atrial fibrillation. Demographics and previously known medical history elements were retrieved from the registry to calculate the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Five neurologists abstracted the same medical history elements from the health records. The κ statistics quantified the reliability of medical history elements and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Four hundred fifty-three patients with acute ischemic stroke and previously known atrial fibrillation were included in the cohort. In comparison with manual reabstraction, registry-based medical history elements were only moderately reliable: congestive heart failure (κ=0.53), hypertension (κ=0.42), diabetes (κ=0.80), prior stroke (κ=0.45), and vascular disease (κ=0.48). However, leveraging these variables to calculate the CHA2DS2-VASc score was more reliable (κ=0.73). Conclusions Previously known medical history elements in the GWTG-Stroke registry were only modestly reliable in this single-center study, suggesting caution should be exercised when relying on any individual history elements in registry-based research. Combining these variables to calculate the CHA2DS2-VASc score was somewhat more reliable. Multicenter data are needed before assuming generalizability.

Highly Visible Wall-Timer to Reduce Endovascular Treatment Time for Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke has revolutionized clinical care for patients with stroke and large vessel occlusion, but treatment remains time sensitive. At our stroke center, up to half of the door-to-groin time is accounted for after the patient arrives in the angio-suite. Here, we apply the concept of a highly visible timer in the angio-suite to quantify the impact on endovascular treatment time. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective pseudorandomized study conducted over a 32-week period. Pseudorandomization was achieved by turning the timer on and off in 2-week intervals. The primary outcome was angio-suite-to-groin time, and secondary outcomes were angio-suite-to-intubation time, groin-to-recanalization time, and 90-day modified Rankin scale. A stratified analysis was performed based on type of anesthesia (ie, endotracheal intubation versus not). RESULTS: During the 32-week study period, 97 mechanical thrombectomies were performed. The timer was on and off for 38 and 59 cases, respectively. The timer resulted in faster angio-suite-to-groin time (28 versus 33 minutes; P=0.02). The 5-minute reduction in angio-suite-to-groin was maintained after adjusting for intubation status in a multivariate regression (P=0.02). There was no difference in the 90-day modified Rankin scale between groups. The timer impact was consistent across the 32-week study period. CONCLUSIONS: A highly visible timer in the angio-suite achieved a meaningful, albeit modest, reduction in endovascular treatment time for patients with stroke. Given the lack of risk and low cost, it is reasonable for stroke centers to consider a highly visible timer in the angio-suite to improve treatment times.

Durability of the Rituximab Response in Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis.

IMPORTANCE: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder of neuromuscular transmission, is treated by an array of immunotherapeutics, many of which are nonspecific. Even with current therapies, a subset of patients has medically refractory MG. The benefits of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab have been observed in MG; however, the duration of these benefits after treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the durability of response to rituximab in the treatment of acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR+) generalized MG. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series study included 16 patients with AChR+ MG referred to an MG clinic from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2015. The patients were treated with rituximab and followed up for 18 to 84 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Assessment of long-term clinical response, durability of response and/or relapse rate, AChR autoantibody levels, adverse effects, and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In the 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; median age, 42 [range, 18-69] years), clinical improvement was observed in parallel with complete withdrawal or reduction of other immunotherapies, with all patients achieving complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestations based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status criteria. Nine patients (56%) had a relapse during a mean follow-up of 36 (range, 24-47) months. Seven patients (44%) remained relapse free with a mean follow-up of 47 (range, 18-81) months since the last rituximab treatment. All values were normalized to a pretreatment anti-AChR antibody level of 100% and the mean levels after each rituximab cycle were calculated. A 33% decrease was seen after cycle 1 of rituximab treatment (100% vs 67%; P = .004); 20% after cycle 2 (compared with cycle 1) (67% vs 47%; P = .008); and 17% after cycle 3 (compared with cycle 2) (47% vs 30%; P = .02). However, the serum cytokine levels measured were found to be unchanged. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rituximab therapy appears to be an effective option in patients with refractory AChR+ MG, who were observed to have a durable response after treatment. Identification of markers of disease relapse and sustained remission are critical next steps in the development of pathophysiology-relevant, evidence-based practice parameters for rituximab in the treatment of MG.