Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Placenta ; 129: 77-83, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257090

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Autopsy is regarded as the "gold standard" to determine probable causes of stillbirths. However, autopsy is expensive and not readily available in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we assessed how the clinical cause of death is modified by adding placental histology and autopsy findings. METHOD: Data from the Safe Passage Study was used where 7060 pregnant women were followed prospectively. Following a stillbirth, each case was discussed and classified at weekly perinatal mortality meetings. This classification was later adapted to the WHO ICD PM system. Clinical information was presented first, and a possible cause of death decided upon and noted. The placental histology was then presented and, again, a possible cause of death, using the placental and clinical information, was decided upon and noted, followed by autopsy information. Diagnoses were then compared to determine how often the additional information changed the initial clinical findings. RESULTS: Clinical information, placental histology, and autopsy results were available in 47 stillbirths. There were major amendments from the clinical only diagnoses when placental histology was added. Forty cases were classified as due to M1: complications of placenta, cord, and membranes, when placental histology was added compared to 7 cases with clinical classification only, and M5: No maternal condition identified decreased from 30 cases to 3 cases. Autopsy findings confirmed the clinical and placental histology findings. DISCUSSION: Clinical information together with examination of the placenta revealed sufficient information to diagnose the most probable cause of death in 40 of 47 cases of stillbirth (85%).


Subject(s)
Placenta Diseases , Stillbirth , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Placenta/pathology , Cause of Death , Autopsy , Placenta Diseases/pathology
2.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 94(12): 1359-66, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26335140

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Because little is known about the effects of maternal position on periodic changes in the maternal heart rate (MHR) in late pregnancy, a prospective observational study was done at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town. Pregnant women admitted for elective cesarean section were studied to determine the effect of changes in position on the maternal and fetal heart rates (FHR) and maternal blood pressure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Continuous transabdominal non-invasive recording of MHR, FHR patterns and uterine activity was done for 1 h in 119 women, using the AN24 device from Monica Health Care. Maternal position was changed every 15 min from lateral to supine, then to the other lateral position and finally supine again. Blood pressure was measured in the left arm and left lower leg three times during each 15-min period. RESULTS: MHRs were four beats per minute slower in the left lateral position than in the right lateral position. Periodic MHR changes were seen in 13 (10.9%) women. Most of these (84.6%) were associated with uterine activity and not with maternal position. No changes in FHR patterns were observed after position changes. CONCLUSIONS: In a subgroup of pregnant women at term, uterine activity was associated with periodic decelerations of the MHR. In low risk pregnancies there seems to be no effect on the FHR pattern. Implications for the compromised fetus have not yet been investigated.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Heart Rate, Fetal/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Posture/physiology , Uterus/physiology , Adult , Blood Pressure/physiology , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies , South Africa
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...