Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an important underlying cause of angina pectoris. Currently, no diagnostic tool is available to directly visualize the coronary microvasculature. Invasive microvascular reactivity testing is the diagnostic standard for CMD, but several non-invasive imaging techniques are being evaluated. However, evidence on reported non-invasive parameters and cut-off values is limited. Thus, we aimed to provide an overview of reported non-invasive parameters and corresponding cut-off values for CMD. METHODS: Pubmed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies enrolling patients with angina pectoris without obstructed coronary arteries, investigating at least one non-invasive imaging technique to quantify CMD. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included. Ten cardiac magnetic resonance studies reported MPRI and nine positron emission tomography (PET) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies reported CFR. Mean MPRI ranged from 1.47 ± 0.36 to 2.01 ± 0.41 in patients and from 1.50 ± 0.47 to 2.68 ± 0.49 in controls without CMD. Reported mean CFR in PET and TTE ranged from 1.39 ± 0.31 to 2.85 ± 1.35 and 1.69 ± 0.40 to 2.40 ± 0.40 for patients, and 2.68 ± 0.83 to 4.32 ± 1.78 and 2.65 ± 0.65 to 3.31 ± 1.10 for controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review summarized current evidence on reported parameters and cut-off values to diagnose CMD for various non-invasive imaging modalities. In current clinical practice, CMD is generally diagnosed with a CFR less than 2.0. However, due to heterogeneity in methodology and reporting of outcome measures, outcomes could not be compared and no definite reference values could be provided.

Individual Differences in Heparin Sensitivity and Their Effect on Heparin Anticoagulation During Arterial Vascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a fixed heparin dose results in adequate heparinisation levels and consequent inhibition of haemostatic activation in all patients. METHODS: This prospective clinical pilot study included 24 patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery. Individual heparin responsiveness was assessed using the Heparin Dose Response (HDR) test, while the activated clotting time (ACT) and heparin concentration were measured to monitor the peri-procedural degree of anticoagulation. Finally, peri-operative haemostasis was evaluated with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). RESULTS: Eight patients were identified with reduced heparin sensitivity (RS group) and 16 patients with normal heparin sensitivity (NS group). Compared with the NS group, the RS group showed less prolonged ACTs after heparinisation with heparin concentrations below the calculated target heparin concentration. ROTEM revealed shorter clot formation times in the intrinsically activated coagulation test (INTEM) 3 min (114 ± 48 s vs. 210 ± 128 s) and 30 min after the initial heparin bolus (103 ± 48 s vs. 173 ± 81 s) in the RS group compared with the NS group. In the RS group, one patient developed a major thromboembolic complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a third of the study population had reduced heparin sensitivity, which was associated with lower levels of heparinisation, and lower inhibition levels of clot initiation and clot formation. Identifying patients with reduced heparin sensitivity by monitoring the anticoagulant effect of heparin could decrease the risk of thrombotic complications after arterial vascular surgery.