Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1266225, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073623

ABSTRACT

Background: Cortical plasticity induced by quadripulse stimulation (QPS) has been shown to correlate with cognitive functions in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and to not be reduced compared to healthy controls (HCs). Objective: This study aimed to compare the degree of QPS-induced plasticity between different subtypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) and HCs and to investigate the association of the degree of plasticity with motor and cognitive functions. We expected lower levels of plasticity in patients with progressive MS (PMS) but not RRMS compared to HCs. Furthermore, we expected to find positive correlations with cognitive and motor performance in patients with MS. Methods: QPS-induced plasticity was compared between 34 patients with PMS, 30 patients with RRMS, and 30 HCs using linear mixed-effects models. The degree of QPS-induced cortical plasticity was correlated with various motor and cognitive outcomes. Results: There were no differences regarding the degree of QPS-induced cortical plasticity between HCs and patients with RRMS (p = 0.86) and PMS (p = 0.18). However, we only found correlations between the level of induced plasticity and both motor and cognitive functions in patients with intact corticospinal tract integrity. Exploratory analysis revealed significantly reduced QPS-induced plasticity in patients with damage compared to intact corticospinal tract integrity (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study supports the notion of pyramidal tract integrity being of more relevance for QPS-induced cortical plasticity in MS and related functional significance than the type of disease.

2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 19619, 2023 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949882

ABSTRACT

Neurological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been frequently described. In this prospective study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients without a history of neurological conditions, we aimed to analyze their prevalence and prognostic value based on established, standardized and objective methods. Patients were investigated using a multimodal electrophysiological approach, accompanied by neuropsychological and neurological examinations. Prevalence rates of central (CNS) and peripheral (PNS) nervous system affections were calculated and the relationship between neurological affections and mortality was analyzed using Firth logistic regression models. 184 patients without a history of neurological diseases could be enrolled. High rates of PNS affections were observed (66% of 138 patients receiving electrophysiological PNS examination). CNS affections were less common but still highly prevalent (33% of 139 examined patients). 63% of patients who underwent neuropsychological testing (n = 155) presented cognitive impairment. Logistic regression models revealed pathology in somatosensory evoked potentials as an independent risk factor of mortality (Odds Ratio: 6.10 [1.01-65.13], p = 0.049). We conclude that hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 display high rates of PNS and CNS affection, which can be objectively assessed by electrophysiological examination. Electrophysiological assessment may have a prognostic value and could thus be helpful to identify patients at risk for deterioration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nervous System Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology
3.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 155: 76-85, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of synaptic plasticity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients during acute relapses compared to stable MS patients and healthy controls (HCs) and to analyze its functional relevance. METHODS: Facilitatory quadripulse stimulation (QPS) was applied to the primary motor cortex in 18 acute relapsing and 18 stable MS patients, as well as 18 HCs. The degree of synaptic plasticity was measured by the change in motor evoked potential amplitude following QPS. Symptom recovery was assessed three months after relapse. RESULTS: Synaptic plasticity was induced in all groups. The degree of induced plasticity did not differ between acute relapsing patients, HCs, and stable MS patients. Plasticity was significantly higher in relapsing patients with motor disability compared to relapsing patients without motor disability. In most patients (n = 9, 50%) symptoms had at least partially recovered three months after the relapse, impeding meaningful analysis of the functional relevance of baseline synaptic plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: QPS-induced synaptic plasticity is retained during acute MS relapses. Subgroup analyses suggest that stabilizing metaplastic mechanisms may be more important to prevent motor disability but its functional relevance needs to be verified in larger, longitudinal studies. SIGNIFICANCE: New insights into synaptic plasticity during MS relapses are provided.

4.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract ; 8: 137-142, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37529161

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation-50 (QPS-50) in patients with intractable epilepsy. Methods: Four patients were included in the study. QPS-50, which induces long-term depression in healthy subjects, was administered for 30 min on a weekly basis for 12 weeks. Patients' clinical symptoms and physiological parameters were evaluated before, during, and after the repeated QPS-50 period. We performed two control experiments: the effect in MEP (Motor evoked potential) size after a single QPS-50 session with a round coil in nine healthy volunteers, and a follow-up study of physiological parameters by repeated QPS-50 sessions in four other healthy participants. Results: Motor threshold (MT) decreased during the repeated QPS-50 sessions in all patients. Epileptic symptoms worsened in two patients, whereas no clinical worsening was observed in the other two patients. In contrast, MT remained unaffected for 12 weeks in all healthy volunteers. Conclusions: QPS-50 may not be effective as a treatment for intractable epilepsy. Significance: In intractable epilepsy patients, administering repeated QPS-50 may paradoxically render the motor cortex more excitable, probably because of abnormal inhibitory control within the epileptic cortex. The possibility of clinical aggravation should be seriously considered when treating intractable epilepsy patients with non-invasive stimulation methods.

6.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 164(4): 1175-1182, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212799

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS), an effective treatment for movement disorders, usually involves lead implantation while the patient is awake and sedated. Recently, there has been interest in performing the procedure under general anesthesia (asleep). This report of a consecutive cohort of DBS patients describes anesthesia protocols for both awake and asleep procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease received subthalamic nucleus (STN) implants either moderately sedated or while intubated, using propofol and remifentanil. Microelectrode recordings were performed with up to five trajectories after discontinuing sedation in the awake group, or reducing sedation in the asleep group. Clinical outcome was compared between groups with the UPDRS III. RESULTS: The awake group (n = 17) received 3.5 mg/kg/h propofol and 11.6 µg/kg/h remifentanil. During recording, all anesthesia was stopped. The asleep group (n = 63) initially received 6.9 mg/kg/h propofol and 31.3 µg/kg/h remifentanil. During recording, this was reduced to 3.1 mg/kg/h propofol and 10.8 µg/kg/h remifentanil. Without parkinsonian medications or stimulation, 3-month UPDRS III ratings (ns = 16 and 52) were 40.8 in the awake group and 41.4 in the asleep group. Without medications but with stimulation turned on, ratings improved to 26.5 in the awake group and 26.3 in the asleep group. With both medications and stimulation, ratings improved further to 17.6 in the awake group and 15.3 in the asleep group. All within-group improvements from the off/off condition were statistically significant (all ps < 0.01). The degree of improvement with stimulation, with or without medications, was not significantly different in the awake vs. asleep groups (ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The above anesthesia protocols make possible an asleep implant procedure that can incorporate sufficient microelectrode recording. Together, this may increase patient comfort and improve clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Subthalamic Nucleus , Anesthesia, General , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Humans , Microelectrodes , Subthalamic Nucleus/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness/physiology
7.
Brain Stimul ; 15(2): 403-413, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cortical reorganization and plasticity may compensate for structural damage in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It is important to establish sensitive methods to measure these compensatory mechanisms, as they may be of prognostic value. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the degree of cortical plasticity and cognitive performance and to compare plasticity between MS patients and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: The amplitudes of the motor evoked potential (MEP) pre and post quadripulse stimulation (QPS) applied over the contralateral motor cortex served as measure of the degree of cortical plasticity in 63 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 55 matched HCs. The main outcomes were the correlation coefficients between the difference of MEP amplitudes post and pre QPS and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), and the QPSxgroup interaction in a mixed model predicting the MEP amplitude. RESULTS: SDMT and BVMT-R correlated significantly with QPS-induced cortical plasticity in RRMS patients. Plasticity was significantly reduced in patients with cognitive impairment compared to patients with preserved cognitive function and the degree of plasticity differentiated between both patient groups. Interestingly, the overall RRMS patient cohort did not show reduced plasticity compared to HCs. CONCLUSIONS: We provide first evidence that QPS-induced plasticity may inform about the global synaptic plasticity in RRMS which correlates with cognitive performance as well as clinical disability. Larger longitudinal studies on patients with MS are needed to investigate the relevance and prognostic value of this measure for disease progression and recovery.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Cognition , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests
8.
Neuromodulation ; 25(6): 888-894, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779014

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: One of the main challenges posed by the surgical deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedure is the successful targeting of the structures of interest and avoidance of side effects, especially in asleep surgery. Here, intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEPs) might serve as tool to identify the pyramidal tract. We hypothesized that intraoperative MEPs are useful to define the distance to the pyramidal tract and reduce the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Motor potentials were evoked through both microelectrode and DBS-electrode stimulation during stereotactic DBS surgery on 25 subthalamic nuclei and 3 ventral intermediate thalamic nuclei. Internal capsule proximity was calculated for contacts on microelectrode trajectories, as well as for DBS-electrodes, and correlated with the corresponding MEP thresholds. Moreover, the predictivity of intraoperative MEP thresholds on the probability of postoperative capsular side effects was calculated. RESULTS: Intraoperative MEPs thresholds correlated significantly with internal capsule proximity, regardless of the stimulation source. Furthermore, MEPs thresholds were highly accurate to exclude the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative MEPs provide additional targeting guidance, especially in asleep DBS surgery, where clinical value of microelectrode recordings and test stimulation may be limited. As this technique can exclude future capsular side effects, it can directly be translated into clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Subthalamic Nucleus , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Humans , Microelectrodes , Pyramidal Tracts , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology
9.
Neuromodulation ; 25(6): 817-828, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34047410

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Published reports on directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been limited to small, single-center investigations. Therapeutic window (TW) is used to describe the range of stimulation amplitudes achieving symptom relief without side effects. This crossover study performed a randomized double-blind assessment of TW for directional and omnidirectional DBS in a large cohort of patients implanted with a DBS system in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received omnidirectional stimulation for the first three months after initial study programming, followed by directional DBS for the following three months. The primary endpoint was a double-blind, randomized evaluation of TW for directional vs omnidirectional stimulation at three months after initial study programming. Additional data recorded at three- and six-month follow-ups included stimulation preference, therapeutic current strength, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor score, and quality of life. RESULTS: The study enrolled 234 subjects (62 ± 8 years, 33% female). TW was wider using directional stimulation in 183 of 202 subjects (90.6%). The mean increase in TW with directional stimulation was 41% (2.98 ± 1.38 mA, compared to 2.11 ± 1.33 mA for omnidirectional). UPDRS part III motor score on medication improved 42.4% at three months (after three months of omnidirectional stimulation) and 43.3% at six months (after three months of directional stimulation) with stimulation on, compared to stimulation off. After six months, 52.8% of subjects blinded to stimulation type (102/193) preferred the period with directional stimulation, and 25.9% (50/193) preferred the omnidirectional period. The directional period was preferred by 58.5% of clinicians (113/193) vs 21.2% (41/193) who preferred the omnidirectional period. CONCLUSION: Directional stimulation yielded a wider TW compared to omnidirectional stimulation and was preferred by blinded subjects and clinicians.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Cross-Over Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
10.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 132(10): 2332-2341, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34454259

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a potentially reversible brain dysfunction caused by liver failure. Altered synaptic plasticity is supposed to play a major role in the pathophysiology of HE. Here, we used paired associative stimulation with an inter-stimulus interval of 25 ms (PAS25), a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol, to test synaptic plasticity of the motor cortex in patients with manifest HE. METHODS: 23 HE-patients and 23 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed as measure for cortical excitability. Time courses of MEP amplitude changes after the PAS25 intervention were compared between both groups. RESULTS: MEP-amplitudes increased after PAS25 in the control group, indicating PAS25-induced synaptic plasticity in healthy controls, as expected. In contrast, MEP-amplitudes within the HE group did not change and were lower than in the control group, indicating no induction of plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed reduced synaptic plasticity of the primary motor cortex in HE. SIGNIFICANCE: Reduced synaptic plasticity in HE provides a link between pathological changes on the molecular level and early clinical symptoms of the disease. This decrease may be caused by disturbances in the glutamatergic neurotransmission due to the known hyperammonemia in HE patients.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy/physiopathology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Paired-Associate Learning/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Aged , Female , Hepatic Encephalopathy/diagnosis , Hepatic Encephalopathy/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
11.
Front Neurosci ; 15: 665258, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33967684

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR. CONCLUSION: The reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP.

12.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 89(1-02): 56-65, 2021 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33465811

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation is an established and evidence-based therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Main indication and inclusion criteria are the presence of idiopathic Parkinsonism with motor fluctuations and / or dyskinesias and / or with medication refractory tremor, a significant improvement of akinesia / rigidity in response to dopaminergic medication, the absence of relevant cognitive deficits and other significant comorbidities. DBS neurosurgery has a low risk of complications. The clinical programming should follow an established monopolar review algorithm. Regular follow-up visits are required for stimulation monitoring.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Dyskinesias , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Tremor/therapy
13.
Exp Brain Res ; 239(2): 583-589, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373012

ABSTRACT

Conditioning transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subthreshold conditioning stimulus followed by supra-threshold test stimulus at inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) of 1-5 ms results in inhibition (SICI), while ISI at 10-15 ms results in facilitation (ICF). One concerning issue, applying ICF/SICI protocols on patients is the substantial protocol variability. Here, we hypothesized that increasing the number of CS could result in more robust ICF/SICI protocols. Twenty healthy subjects participated in the study. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were obtained from conditioning TMS with a varying number of conditioning stimuli in 3, 4, 10, and 15 ms ISI over the primary motor cortex. MEP amplitudes were then compared to examine excitability. TMS with 3, 5, and 7 conditioning stimuli but not with one conditioning stimulus induced ICF. Moreover, 10 ms ISI produced stronger ICF than 15 ms ISI. Significant SICI was only induced with one conditioning stimulus. Besides, 3 ms ISI resulted in stronger SICI than 4 ms ISI. Only a train of conditioning stimuli induced stable ICF and may be more advantageous than the classical paired pulse ICF paradigm.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Motor Cortex , Conditioning, Classical , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Humans , Neural Inhibition , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
14.
Neuromodulation ; 24(2): 343-352, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666569

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) and the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is a well-established therapy for essential tremor (ET), but it is frequently associated with side effects like dysarthria or gait ataxia. Directional DBS (dDBS) may be a way to activate fiber tracts more selectively. Is dDBS for ET superior to omnidirectional DBS (oDBS) regarding therapeutic window and clinically as effective as oDBS? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with ET treated with PSA/VIM-DBS were recruited. Therapeutic window served as primary outcome parameter; clinical efficacy, volume of neuronal activation, and total electrical energy delivered (TEED) served as secondary outcome parameters. Therapeutic window was calculated for all three dDBS directions and for oDBS by determining therapeutic thresholds and side effect thresholds. Clinical efficacy was assessed by comparing the effect of best dDBS and oDBS on tremor and ataxia rating scales, and accelerometry. Volume of neural activation and TEED were also calculated for both paradigms. RESULTS: For best dDBS, therapeutic window was wider and therapeutic threshold was lower compared to oDBS. While side effect threshold did not differ, volume of neural activation was larger for dDBS. In terms of clinical efficacy, dDBS was as effective as oDBS. CONCLUSIONS: dDBS for ET widens therapeutic window due to reduction of therapeutic threshold. Larger volume of neural activation for dDBS at side effect threshold supports the notion of persistent directionality even at higher intensities. dDBS may compensate for slightly misplaced leads and should be considered first line for PSA/VIM-DBS.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Essential Tremor , Essential Tremor/therapy , Humans , Neurons , Thalamus , Treatment Outcome , Ventral Thalamic Nuclei
15.
Neuromodulation ; 24(2): 279-285, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The effect of anesthesia type in terms of asleep vs. awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery on therapeutic window (TW) has not been investigated so far. The objective of the study was to investigate whether asleep DBS surgery of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves TW for both directional (dDBS) and omnidirectional (oDBS) stimulation in a large single-center population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) undergoing STN-DBS surgery (80 asleep and 24 awake) were compared regarding TW, therapeutic threshold, side effect threshold, improvement of Unified PD Rating Scale motor score (UPDRS-III) and degree of levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) reduction. RESULTS: Asleep DBS surgery led to significantly wider TW compared to awake surgery for both dDBS and oDBS. However, dDBS further increased TW compared to oDBS in the asleep group only and not in the awake group. Clinical efficacy in terms of UPDRS-III improvement and LEDD reduction did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides first evidence for improvement of therapeutic window by asleep surgery compared to awake surgery, which can be strengthened further by dDBS. These results support the notion of preferring asleep over awake surgery but needs to be confirmed by prospective trials.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Deep Brain Stimulation , Subthalamic Nucleus , Humans , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness
16.
Front Neurol ; 11: 574004, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33224088

ABSTRACT

Objective: The affection of both the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous system (CNS) by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been assumed to play a direct role in the respiratory failure of patients with Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) through affection of medullary cardiorespiratory centers resulting in neurological complications and sequelae. Methods: We used a multimodal electrophysiological approach combined with neuropsychological investigations to study functional alteration of both the PNS and CNS in four patients with severe COVID-19. Results: We found electrophysiological evidence for affection of both the PNS and CNS, and particularly affection of brain stem function. Furthermore, our neuropsychological investigations provide evidence of marked impairment of cognition independent of delirium, and outlasting the duration of acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: This case series provides first direct electrophysiological evidence for functional brain stem involvement in COVID-19 patients without evident morphological changes supporting the notion of the brain stem contributing to respiratory failure and thus promoting severe courses of the disease. Moreover, sustained neuropsychological sequelae in these patients may be of particular psychosocial and possibly also economic relevance for society.

17.
BMC Neurosci ; 21(1): 48, 2020 11 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To identify mechanisms of cortical plasticity of the visual cortex and to quantify their significance, sensitive parameters are warranted. In this context, multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) can make a valuable contribution as they are not associated with cancellation artifacts and include also the peripheral visual field. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce mfVEP changes. METHODS: 18 healthy participants were included in a single-blind crossover-study receiving sessions of excitatory, occipital 10 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation. MfVEP was performed before and after each rTMS session and changes in amplitude and latency between both sessions were compared using generalized estimation equation models. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in amplitude or latency between verum and sham group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that occipital 10 Hz rTMS has no effect on mfVEP measures, which is in line with previous studies using full field VEP.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Occipital Lobe/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Cross-Over Studies , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Long-Term Potentiation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Cortex , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Single-Blind Method , Visual Cortex , Young Adult
18.
Exp Brain Res ; 238(5): 1305-1309, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32322929

ABSTRACT

Cortical facilitation assessed with triad conditioning transcranial magnetic stimulation has been termed triad-conditioned facilitation (TCF). TCF has been supposed to reflect increased intracortical facilitation (ICF) at short interstimulus intervals (ISI) around 10 ms and an intrinsic rhythm of the motor cortex at longer ISI around 25 ms. To gain further insight into the pathophysiological mechanism of TCF, we systematically studied the effect of suprathreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) and test stimulus (TS) intensity on TCF. Various CS intensities and TS intensities were used in a triad-conditioning paradigm that was applied to 11 healthy subjects. ISI between pulses were studied between 5 and 200 ms. TCF at 10 ms ISI enhanced with increasing CS intensity but decreased with increasing TS intensity. The duration of facilitation was longer with higher CS intensity. However, TCF at 25 ms ISI could not be elicited with none of the CS and TS intensities addressed here. Our results are consistent with the notion of TCF at short ISI reflecting ICF. The enhanced and prolonged facilitation with increase of CS without additional isolated facilitation at longer ISI suggest a prolongation of ICF.


Subject(s)
Conditioning, Classical/physiology , Cortical Excitability/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Adult , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young Adult
19.
Cerebellum ; 18(5): 969-971, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367947

ABSTRACT

DYT-THAP1 dystonia is known to present a variety of clinical symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case with DYT-THAP 1 dystonia and clinical signs of cerebellar involvement studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation in vivo. We report a case of a 51-year-old male DYT-THAP1 mutation carrier with dystonia, who additionally developed ataxia 1.5 years ago. To study cerebellar involvement in our patient, we used a TMS protocol called cerebellar inhibition (CBI). The lack of CBI in our patient strongly suggests cerebellar involvement. According to our findings, cerebellar syndrome may be part of the phenotypical spectrum of DYT-THAP1 mutations.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/genetics , Cerebellum/diagnostic imaging , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Dystonia/diagnostic imaging , Dystonia/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Cerebellum/physiopathology , Dystonia/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
20.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 12: 1756286419838096, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30944587

ABSTRACT

During the last 30 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has evolved into the clinical standard of care as a highly effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. Careful patient selection, an individualized anatomical target localization and meticulous evaluation of stimulation parameters for chronic DBS are crucial requirements to achieve optimal results. Current hardware-related advances allow for a more focused, individualized stimulation and hence may help to achieve optimal clinical results. However, current advances also increase the degrees of freedom for DBS programming and therefore challenge the skills of healthcare providers. This review gives an overview of the clinical effects of DBS, the criteria for patient, target, and device selection, and finally, offers strategies for a structured programming approach.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...