ABSTRACT
We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of esmolol, an ultra-short-acting, cardioselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker, in controlling sinus tachycardia and increased systolic blood pressure occurring perioperatively in 30 ASA physical status II or III patients having elective, non-cardiac surgery. Esmolol 80 mg I.V. bolus (N = 15) or placebo (N = 15) followed by 12 mg/min or placebo were infused in 30 isoflurane-anesthetized patients using a randomized double-blind study design. The bolus plus infusions were given when surgical stimuli caused heart rate to exceed 95 bpm or systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg. Esmolol significantly decreased heart rate (107 +/- 4, mean +/- SEM to 99 +/- 4, mean +/- SEM bpm) within 45 sec after starting the bolus plus infusion; the placebo had no effect, heart rate being 105 +/- 4 before and 106 +/- 3 bpm after the bolus plus infusion. Patients given esmolol continued to have heart rates significantly lower than patients given placebo injections throughout a six min infusion (Ex., at 5 min 81 +/- 3 vs 91 +/- 4 bpm). The study demonstrated no apparent effect of esmolol on blood pressure but that esmolol is effective in treating perioperative sinus tachycardia.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacology , Anesthesia, General , Hypertension/drug therapy , Intraoperative Complications/drug therapy , Propanolamines/therapeutic use , Tachycardia, Sinus/drug therapy , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Random AllocationABSTRACT
Propofol, a phenol compound with a short elimination half-life, was compared with thiopental and isoflurane for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in 60 consenting ASA I, II, and III patients. The study was randomized and open label in design. Hemodynamically, the propofol patients showed a mean +/- SEM decrease in systolic blood pressure in comparison with the thiopental/isoflurane group at 2 (115.1 +/- 4.9 vs. 136.6 +/- 6.0 mmHg), 3 (125.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 149.4 +/- 5.6 mmHg), and 5 min (126.6 +/- 3.8 vs. 144.4 +/- 6.1 mmHg) postinduction and at intubation (135.2 +/- 4.7 vs. 157.8 +/- 6.0 mmHg) (p less than 0.05). The heart rate was lower in the propofol group throughout the induction period (p less than 0.05). Patients who received propofol were ready for discharge from the recovery room sooner (67.9 +/- 4.0 vs. 80.0 +/- 3.6 min) than the thiopental/isoflurane-treated patients (p less than 0.05). Propofol is as safe and effective for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia as thiopental and isoflurane.
