ABSTRACT
Existing measures of health care access were inadequate for guiding policy decisions in West Virginia, as they identified the entire state as having limited access. To address this, we compiled a comprehensive database of primary health care providers and facilities in the state, developed a modified E2SFCA tool to measure spatial access in the context of West Virginia's rural and mountainous nature, and integrated this with an index of socio-economic barriers to access. The integrated index revealed that the rural areas, especially in the southern part of the state, have especially limited access to primary health care. 1. Introduction. An emerging public health issue which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, is that of healthcare deserts, which are places where basic affordable health care is not accessible for residents. This problem has become worse in rural areas as rural hospitals close. In these areas, including West Virginia, scattered populations suffer from limited access to primary healthcare services. Uneven geographic and socio-economic barriers to accessing primary health care are major contributing factors to these health disparities. West Virginia's unique rural and mountainous settlement patterns, aging population, and economic crisis over the past two decades have resulted in unequal access to the primary healthcare services for its residents. The rural nature of the state makes it difficult to maintain medical facilities accessible to much of the population, especially as rural hospitals have been closing, such as the one in Williamson, WV (Jarvie, 2020). The mountainous terrain slows down travel across winding roads, lengthening travel times to the nearest hospital, while an aging population has increased health care needs. Lastly, an economic crisis and higher poverty rate makes West Virginians less able to pay for health care. As a result, West Virginians are confronting a health crisis. According to a recent report by the West Virginia Health Statistics Center (2019), West Virginians rank first in the country for heart attacks, have the second-highest obesity rate and prevalence of mental health problems in the country, along with the fourth-highest rate of diabetes and fifth-highest rate of cancer. An issue faced by West Virginia's policymakers is the limitations of tools for identifying and assessing healthcare deserts, as they are poorly suited for the unique challenges in West Virginia. Academic research has not analyzed comprehensive primary healthcare accessibility in WV, although previous studies have focused on Appalachia (e.g., Behringer & Friedell 2006; Smith & Holloman, 2011; Elnicki et al., 1995; Donohoe et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b), and others focus on access to more specialized services (Valvi et al., 2019; Donohoe, 2016a). Existing approaches to identify the healthcare deprived areas, such as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA), are not suitable for guiding West Virginia policies, because every one of the 55 counties within the state has several HPSAs, which makes prioritizing resources difficult. The lack of easily accessible, comprehensive, and up-to-date physician and healthcare facility database creates additional difficulties. Physician license datasets were found to often include inconsistent, misleading, and out-of-date information. The last limitation of the HPSA designation is that it is based on zip code areas and census tracts, which are not ideal as zip code areas lack spatial context and much covariate data, while rural census tracts are too large to capture spatial variation of access. In this context, the WV HealthLink project was begun with joint effort with WV Rural Health Initiative (RHI) to fill gaps in research and support decision making for primary healthcare access in West Virginia. The goals of the projects are: (1) to help West Virginia's three medical schools provide specialized professional training in rural healthcare; (2) to address health disparities by investing in clinical projects in underserved areas; and (3) to retain health professionals in WV. In 2018, to support these goals, HealthLink was invited by the RHI's leadership to analyze disparities in primary health care access in West Virginia and develop tools for rural healthcare decision-making. These goals also create a comprehensive and up-to-date physician and facility database, new analysis tools, and new visualization tools for decision support. The goals of this paper are to assess the spatial and social accessibility of primary health care in West Virginia, and to understand spatial and social determinants that shape this access. To achieve these goals, this paper completes the following objectives: (1) define primary healthcare and access; (2) build an extensive and up-to-date primary healthcare database; (3) develop an assessment framework for WV; and (4) visualize the results for policy makers and practitioners. The structure of this paper is as follows. First, we describe three methodological problems encountered as we define primary health care access. Second, we present the methods used to resolve these problems, and conclude by presenting our modified enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2FCA hereafter) approach and its results for WV. Our foci in this modification were improving the accuracy of the analysis regarding measuring distance, considering distance decay effect, and more precisely representing the location of supply and demand.
ABSTRACT
Many places within rural America lack ready access to health care facilities. Barriers to access can be both spatial and non-spatial. Measurements of spatial access, such as the Enhanced Floating 2-Step Catchment Area and other floating catchment area measures, produce similar patterns of access. However, the extent to which different measurements of socioeconomic barriers to access correspond with each other has not been examined. Using West Virginia as a case study, we compute indices based upon the literature and measure the correlations among them. We find that all indices positively correlate with each other, although the strength of the correlation varies. Also, while there is broad agreement in the general spatial trends, such as fewer barriers in urban areas, and more barriers in the impoverished southwestern portion of the state, there are regions within the state that have more disagreement among the indices. These indices are to be used to support decision-making with respect to placement of rural residency students from medical schools within West Virginia to provide students with educational experiences as well as address health care inequalities within the state. The results indicate that for decisions and policies that address statewide trends, the choice of metric is not critical. However, when the decisions involve specific locations for receiving rural residents or opening clinics, the results can become more sensitive to the selection of the index. Therefore, for fine-grained policy decision-making, it is important that the chosen index best represents the processes under consideration.
