Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cochlear implant (CI) electrode distances to the cochlea's inner wall (the modiolus) and electrical impedance measurements made at the CI's electrode contacts. We introduced a protocol for "three-point impedances" in which we recorded bipolar impedances in response to monopolar stimulation at a neighboring electrode. We aimed to assess the usability of three-point impedances and two existing CI impedance measurement methods (monopolar and four-point impedances) for predicting electrode positioning during CI insertion. METHODS: Impedances were recorded during stepwise CI electrode array insertions in cadaveric human temporal bones. The positioning of the electrodes with respect to the modiolus was assessed at each step using cone beam computed tomography. Linear mixed regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the impedances and electrode-modiolar distances. The experimental results were compared to clinical impedance data and to an existing lumped-element model of an implanted CI. RESULTS: Three-point and four-point impedances strongly correlated with electrode-modiolar distance. In contrast, monopolar impedances were only minimally affected by changes in electrode positioning with respect to the modiolus. An overall model specificity of 62% was achieved when incorporating all impedance parameters. This specificity could be increased beyond 73% when prior expectations of electrode positioning were incorporated in the model. CONCLUSION: Three-point and four-point impedances are promising measures to predict electrode-modiolar distance in real-time during CI insertion. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows how electrical impedance measurements can be used to predict the CI's electrode positioning in a biologically realistic model.

Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation to Enhance Response Interpretation.

The use of electrocochleography (ECochG) for providing real-time feedback of cochlear function during cochlear implantation is receiving increased attention for preventing cochlear trauma and preserving residual hearing. Although various studies investigated the relationship between intra-operative ECochG measurements and surgical outcomes in recent years, the limited interpretability of ECochG response changes leads to conflicting study results and prevents the adoption of this method for clinical use. Specifically, the movement of the recording electrode with respect to the different signal generators in intracochlear recordings makes the interpretation of signal changes with respect to cochlear trauma difficult. Here, we demonstrate that comparison of ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from intracochlear locations and from a fixed extracochlear location can potentially allow a differentiation between traumatic and atraumatic signal changes in intracochlear recordings. We measured ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts with alternating starting phases during cochlear implant insertions in six human cochlear implant recipients. Our results show that an amplitude decrease with associated near 180° phase shift and harmonic distortions in the intracochlear difference curve during the first half of insertion was not accompanied by a decrease in the extracochlear difference curve's amplitude (n = 1), while late amplitude decreases in intracochlear difference curves (near full insertion, n = 2) did correspond to extracochlear amplitude decreases. These findings suggest a role for phase shifts, harmonic distortions, and recording location in interpreting intracochlear ECochG responses.

Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To correlate simultaneously recorded intra- and extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) signals during electrode insertion into the cochlea, (2) to track changes in the ECochG signal during insertion and removal of an electrode, and (3) to correlate the findings with the preoperative residual hearing. We hypothesized that intracochlear ECochG recordings show signal changes not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. DESIGN: During cochlear implantation in human cochlear implant recipients, a short, slim, custom-made electrode was inserted and removed in a stepwise manner. At each step, ECochG recordings were simultaneously recorded by an extracochlear electrode near the round window and via the inserted electrode. The acoustic stimulus was a 500 Hz tone burst at 110 to 130 dB SPL. RESULTS: The mean amplitude difference between intra- and extracochlear ongoing ECochG responses was 14 dB (range 9 to 24 dB; n = 10) at the beginning of insertion. Intracochlear ECochG responses were larger in all cases. Extracochlear ECochG responses remained stable while intracochlear recordings showed large variations regarding amplitude and phase during the electrode array insertion. Intracochlear signal changes during insertion were reversible with retraction of the electrode. There were only weak to moderate (rs = 0.006 to 0.4), nonsignificant correlations of residual preoperative hearing with maximum amplitudes and amplitude changes during electrode insertion and removal in intracochlear recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Signals in intracochlear ECochG recordings are reliably larger than ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from an extracochlear location. Intracochlear ECochG recordings show reversible amplitude and phase changes during insertion, not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. Such changes are most likely due to the movement of the recording electrode in relation to the signal generators. Residual high-frequency hearing is associated with larger ECochG signal amplitudes. Modeling of expected intracochlear ECochG changes during electrode insertions may allow detection of cochlear trauma in the future.

Stimulus coherence influences sound-field localization and fusion/segregation of leading and lagging sounds.

The ability to localize sound sources in reverberant environments is dependent upon first-arriving information, an outcome commonly termed "the precedence effect." For example, in laboratory experiments, the combination of a leading (direct) sound followed by a lagging (reflected) sound is localized in the direction of the leading sound. This study was designed to measure the degree to which stimulus compactness/diffuseness (i.e., coherence as represented by interaural cross correlation) of leading and lagging sounds influences performance. The compactness/diffuseness of leading or lagging sounds was varied by either presenting a sound from a single loudspeaker or by presenting mutually uncorrelated versions of similar sounds from nine adjacent loudspeakers. In separate experiments, the listener's task was to point to the perceived location of leading and lagging 10-ms long low-pass filtered white noises or 2-s long tokens of speech. The leading and lagging stimuli were presented either from speakers located directly in front of the listeners or from speakers located ±45° to the right or left. The results indicate that leading compact (coherent) sounds influence perceived location more so than do leading diffuse (incoherent) sounds. This was true independent of whether the sounds were Gaussian noises or tokens of speech.