Bilateral implantation of asymmetrical diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual results after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with asymmetrical light distribution for the far and near focus. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients underwent bilateral implantation of silicone-optic, foldable, diffractive IOLs in a prospective, 2-center, noncontrolled interventional study. Each patient had a distant-dominant multifocal IOL implanted in 1 eye and a near-dominant multifocal IOL implanted in the fellow eye. Refractive and visual results, including contrast acuity and binocular visual function, were determined. Patients were questioned for postoperative spectacle usage. RESULTS: Visual and contrast acuity in the dominant focus of either lens was superior to that in the nondominant focus at 3.5 to 12 months postoperatively, i.e., performance was best at distance for the distant-dominant and at near for the near-dominant lens. In binocular viewing, the monocular maximal results added up to an improved binocular visual performance. Binocular visual function was within normal limits. Eighty percent of patients reported no use of spectacles at any time postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral implantation of asymmetrical diffractive IOLs is an effective alternative for restoring simultaneous distance and near vision with a potential for improved contrast sensitivity compared with conventional multifocal IOLs.

[Twilight vision and glare sensitivity in monofocal and multifocal pseudophakia]. / Dämmerungssehvermögen und Blendempfindlichkeit bei monofokaler und multifokaler Pseudophakie.

UNLABELLED: Reduced contrast sensitivity and an increase in glare sensitivity may be observed in patients with cataract and in pseudophakic persons. By means of Mesoptometer II we examined night driving ability according to the recommendations of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) in patients with cataract, monofocal or multifocal pseudophakia. METHODS: A total of 176 patients were included in the study: 85 patients (68.8 years) with a monofocal standard IOL, 50 patients (66.1 years) with a multifocal IOL type AMO Array SSM-26NB/SA-40NB and 41 patients with beginning cataract (66.4 years). The corrected visual acuity of all patients was at least 0.7. Contrast acuity was examined at a luminance setting of 0.32 cd/m2; glare sensitivity was measured at a luminance of 0.1 cd/m2 with additional glare source. RESULTS: Night driving ability (both criteria accomplished) was found in 41% of patients with binocular monofocal IOL and in 38% of patients with binocular multifocal IOL. CONCLUSION: Elderly pseudophakic patients and patients with beginning cataract cannot sufficiently fulfill the criteria for night driving ability because of contrast and glare sensitivity. It seems to be indispensable, for the parameters mentioned to be carefully examined and for patients to be informed that night driving ability may be impaired, even if visual acuity is sufficient.

[Nosocomial infections in a neurosurgical intensive care unit]. / Nosokomiale Infektionen in einer Neurochirurgischen Intensivstation.

The occurrence of nosocomial infections in 1017 consecutive patients seen in a neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU), over a period of 18 months is reported. The frequency of infections is low, which may possibly be due partly to the short stay in the ICU. Close interdisciplinary cooperation is stressed as an important factor in limiting infections. BACKGROUND. The aim of this study was to analyse the nosocomial infections in a neurosurgical intensive care unit over a period of 18 months, emphasizing localization and cause of infection, in order to adapt treatment and to take preventive measures. From 15% to 27% of patients treated in ICUs acquire nosocomial infections. In Germany this means 500,000-800,000 patients a year, and the annual costs related to nosocomial infections are estimated at 1.7 billion Deutschmarks. PATIENTS AND METHODS. In all, 1017 consecutive patients were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, depending on the duration of treatment in the ICU: Patients who remained for less than 48 h (1017 patients) Patients who were treated for a period exceeding 48 h (314 patients) The evaluation was performed retrospectively from the medical documentation. Criteria for registration are those of the Centers for Disease Control (Atlanta 1988). When more than one infection was diagnosed, each was considered as a new infection, regardless of the bacteria involved. Among the 314 patients who were in the ICU for more than 48 h a total of 114 nosocomial infections were recorded. The frequency of infection referred to all patients treated during that time (n = 1017) was 11.2%, while the frequency among those who were treated for longer than 48 h was 36.3%. Most infections (38.6%) affected the respiratory tract, followed by infections of the urinary tract. Of the bacteria determined 56.7% were gram-negative. In this group E. coli was the most frequently found (29.8%). In the group of gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus was diagnosed in 56.3% of cases. Twelve (16%) of the infected patients died and lethality referred to all patients was 8.6%. DISCUSSION. Compared with other studies, this study revealed a low the infection rate, at 11.2%. This can be explained partly by the short stay in this ICU (mean 3.7 days) and partly by the retrospective method of registration and the particular medical characteristics of neurosurgical patients. The well-known general risk factors for infection, such as age, mechanical ventilation, continuous catheterization of the bladder, and long duration of stay, are also found in neurosurgical ICUs. It is quite difficult to determine to what extent nosocomial infections prolong the treatment necessitated by the primary neurosurgical disease. We were not able to extrapolate the influence of immunosuppressant treatment on the appearance of nosocomial infections, as almost all patients in this study were receiving steroids. This study underlines the necessity of interdisciplinary cooperation between neurosurgeons, anaesthesiologists, microbiologists and nurses in neurosurgical ICUs, where most patients staying longer than 48 h are immunosuppressed and ventilated and thereby particularly at risk of nosocomial infections.