Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 64(3): 102042, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Half of patients admitted to medicine units report sleep disruption, which increases the risk of sleep deprivation. Non-pharmacological interventions are the first step to improving sleep. However, utilization of sleep aids continues to be prevalent. Limited data are available on sleep aid prescribing practices across transitions of care. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the current practices for assessing sleep and prescribing pharmacologic agents to promote sleep in the adult medicine population. METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of all patients discharged by the general medicine teams over a 3-month period (September 2019- November 2019). Prior to admission, inpatient and discharge prescriptions for sleep aids were recorded, and documentation of sleep assessments and non-pharmacological interventions were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 754 patients included, 211 (28%) were prescribed a sleep aid while inpatient. During hospitalization, 124 (16%) patients had at least one documented sleep assessment, and only 22 (3%) were ordered the institutional non-pharmacological sleep promotion order set. The most prescribed sleep aid in inpatients was melatonin (50%), as well as prior to admission (35%) and at discharge (25%). Overall, the relative reduction in sleep aid prescriptions between admission and discharge was 67%. CONCLUSION: Inpatient sleep aid prescribing is common in medical patients. Despite this, sleep assessments and the standard of care of non-pharmacological interventions are rarely utilized. Future efforts should focus on implementation of strategies to make sleep assessments and non-pharmacological sleep promotion routine and consistent in the inpatient setting.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Inpatients , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Sleep , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Adult , Cohort Studies , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over
2.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10507, 2020 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094048

ABSTRACT

Moxifloxacin is a rare but important cause of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DIT). We describe a patient who presented with an acute onset of severe thrombocytopenia complicated by petechial rash, epistaxis, and melena. Recent new drug exposures included moxifloxacin and two proton pump inhibitors. On presentation to the hospital, all recently initiated medications were discontinued and the patient's thrombocytopenia was treated with platelet transfusions, intravenous immunoglobulin, and high-dose corticosteroids. Her thrombocytopenia improved over the next seven days and she was discharged on hospital day 8. Serologic testing revealed strongly positive moxifloxacin-dependent IgM and IgG antiplatelet antibodies, confirming a diagnosis of moxifloxacin-induced immune thrombocytopenia. DIT has been reported with other fluoroquinolone antibiotics, especially ciprofloxacin. This case documents a rare but potentially fatal complication of exposure to moxifloxacin and is the first to demonstrate objective evidence of acute sensitization with IgM antibody positivity. It highlights the need to consider this potential reaction when choosing antibiotic therapy, particularly in patients who are at high risk for bleeding, have hematologic disorders, or are receiving myelosuppressive therapies, and perhaps in those with a history of multiple drug allergies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...