ABSTRACT
Background: The aim of the current study was to compare three different dose-calculating algorithms, i.e., superposition (SP), fast SP (FSP), and convolution (CV), for breast cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and field-in-Field forward plan IMRT (FiF-FP-IMRT). Materials and Methods: The current retrospective study involved 100 postmastectomy breast cancer patients who were given radiotherapy using IMRT and FiF-FP-IMRT planning techniques. All the initially SP-calculated plans were recalculated with the same monitor units for FSP and CV algorithm without change in any of the other planning parameters. The isodose distribution and various plan evaluating parameters, for example, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index, and uniformity index target volume and normal structure doses were compared and analyzed for all the different algorithm calculated plans. Results: In the IMRT plans, all the target and normal structure dose-volume parameters showed a significant difference between all the three different algorithms with P < 0.05. In the FiF-FP-IMRT plans, CV algorithm showed a significant difference in most of the target and normal structure dose-volume parameters. Among quality indexes, only CI showed a significant difference between all the algorithms in both the planning techniques. R50 showed a significant difference with the CV algorithm in both the planning techniques. Conclusion: The change in the dose calculation algorithm resulted in dosimetric changes which must be evaluated by the medical physicists and oncologists while evaluating treatment plans. In the current study with breast patients, the results obtained for target and normal structure doses using the CV algorithm are overestimated as compared to SP and FSP algorithms, producing variable results in air and bony normal structures. However, the ipsilateral lung V5 parameter and the ipsilateral humeral head mean dose were found to be underestimated by the CV algorithm as compared to the SP and FSP algorithm in both the planning techniques.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to consider and calculate dosimetric parameters during treatment planning to improve radiobiological outcomes for cervical cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Material and methods: In the present study, dose volume histograms (DVH) of 30 cervical cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy using computer tomography (CT)-based planning were analyzed. High-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was contoured as the main target volume for all the patients, with an assumption that there was no presence of gross tumor at the time of brachytherapy. Values of target coverage volumes (100%, 150%, and 200%) were obtained from DVH, which was used to calculate different quality indices (QIs), including coverage index (CI), dose homogeneity index (DHI), overdose volume index (ODI), and dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR). Values of these QIs were further used to calculate tumor control probability (TCP). Statistical correlation between all QIs with TCP was established. Also, normal tissue complication probabilities for bladder (NTCP_B) and rectum (NTCP_R) were calculated. Results: The mean values of the various calculated parameters, including CI, DHI, ODI, DNR, TCP, NTCP_B and NTCP_R were 0.92 ±0.07, 0.26 ±0.10, 0.50 ±0.10, 0.74 ±0.10, 0.92 ±0.07, 0.08 ±0.25, and 0.36 ±0.27, respectively. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient between CI, DHI, ODI, and DNR with regards to TCP was +0.85, -0.85, +0.84, and +0.85, respectively. Conclusions: The correlation between dosimetric and radiobiological parameters was found statistically significant, which shows the influence of dosimetric parameters on the radiobiological outcome. Therefore, these parameters should be considered during the treatment planning to improve the radiobiological outcome.
ABSTRACT
Background: Surface/skin dose measurement is one of the most challenging tasks for clinical dosimetry in radiotherapy and comparison with almost all the commercially available treatment planning systems (TPSs) brings a significant variation with the measured dose. Aims and Objectives: In the current study, doses calculated from the TPS in the near-surface region for conformal plans (both three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy [3DCRT] and intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]) of 35 breast cancer patients were evaluated and compared with the doses measured with Markus chamber. Materials and Methods: The computed tomography (CT) images of a solid water slab phantom with a Markus chamber (at different depths ranging from 1 mm to 5 mm from the surface) were taken and imported into the TPS. All the conformal treatment plans made in TPS were executed on a linear accelerator and dose agreements between TPS calculated and chamber measured doses were analysed. Results: Results showed that this TPS underestimated the calculated doses in the superficial region by up to 26% and 21%, respectively, with respect to mean and maximum dose values obtained within the effective volume of the chamber used. Conclusion: The uncertainty of doses in the superficial region should be kept in mind when evaluating treatment plans for superficial tumours in TPS.
