Pylorus preserving loop duodeno-enterostomy with sleeve gastrectomy - preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric operations mostly combine a restrictive gastric component with a rerouting of the intestinal passage. The pylorus can thereby be alternatively preserved or excluded. With the aim of performing a "pylorus-preserving gastric bypass", we present early results of a proximal postpyloric loop duodeno-jejunostomy associated with a sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) compared to results of a parallel, but distal LSG with a loop duodeno-ileostomy as a two-step procedure. METHODS: 16 patients underwent either a two-step LSG with a distal loop duodeno-ileostomy (DIOS) as revisional bariatric surgery or a combined single step operation with a proximal duodeno-jejunostomy (DJOS). Total small intestinal length was determined to account for inter-individual differences. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the second-step of the DIOS operation was 121 min and 147 min for the combined DJOS operation. The overall intestinal length was 750.8 cm (range 600-900 cm) with a bypassed limb length of 235.7 cm in DJOS patients. The mean length of the common channel in DIOS patients measured 245.6 cm. Overall excess weight loss (%EWL) of the two-step DIOS procedure came to 38.31% and 49.60%, DJOS patients experienced an %EWL of 19.75% and 46.53% at 1 and 6 months, resp. No complication related to the duodeno-enterostomy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Loop duodeno-enterosomies with sleeve gastrectomy can be safely performed and may open new alternatives in bariatric surgery with the possibility for inter-individual adaptation.

To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the procedure with the fastest growing numbers worldwide. Although excellent weight loss can be achieved, one major obstacle of LSG is weight regain due to sleeve dilatation. Banded sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) has been described as an option to counteract sleeve dilatation and ameliorate weight loss over time. In a retrospective study, we analysed 25 patients who underwent BLSG using a MiniMizer® ring. Twenty five patients who had previously undergone a conventional LSG were selected for matched-pair analysis. Patient follow-up was 12 months in both groups. Mean preoperative BMI was 56.1 ± 7.2 kg/m(2) for BLSG and 57.0 ± 6.3 kg/m(2) for LSG, P = 0.522. Operative time was significantly shorter for BLSG (53 ± 27 min vs. 68 ± 20 min, P = 0.0025). Excess weight loss (%EWL) was equal in both groups with %EWL at 12 months of 58.0 ± 14.6 % for BSLG patients vs. 58.4 ± 19.2 % for LSG patients. There was no procedure-related mortality in either group. At 12 months postoperative, vomiting was significantly increased in BSLG patients (OR 6.75, P = 0.035). New onset reflux was equal in both groups (OR 0.67, P = 0.469). Ring implantation does not increase the duration of surgery or early surgical complications. Weight loss in the first follow-up year is not influenced, but the incidence of vomiting is raised after 12 months when patients start to increase eating volume.

Systematic ileal transposition in Zucker rats shows advantage for long segment distal transposition.

INTRODUCTION: The possibility of achieving diabetes remission through bariatric surgery has dramatically changed treatment options for this disease. Ileal transposition (IT), specifically designed to provoke diabetes remission, has so far shown great success in rodent studies. However, it remains uncertain which combination of ileal length and origin produces best results. METHODS: Forty male Zucker rats underwent transposition of 25% distal, 50% distal, and 50% proximal ileum or sham surgery. Glucose control, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 serum levels were analyzed after 1, 3, and 6 months. Body weight was recorded weekly. RESULTS: In relation to sham-operated animals, the 50% distal IT presented with improved glucose tolerance after 1, 3, and 6 months (2-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]: P < .05, < .0001, and < .0001, respectively). The 25% distal and 50% proximal IT only showed improved glucose control after 3 months, suggesting a fading effect in long-term observation (2-way ANOVA: P < .0001 for both). Glucose-stimulated GLP-1 levels were steadily elevated only in the 2 distal IT groups (Mann-Whitney sham versus 50% distal, P < .01, < .01, and < .05; sham versus 25% distal, P < .01, = .001, < .05 for 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively). IT had no impact on serum insulin levels. CONCLUSION: The current study restates the findings of improved glucose tolerance and GLP-1 stimulation after IT, but is the first to demonstrate a fading glycemic effect in long-term observation. Systematic comparison of length and ileal origin revealed that long and distal transposition delivers best results.

Long segment ileal transposition leads to early amelioration of glucose control in the diabetic obese Zucker rat.

INTRODUCTION: Fast delivery of food to the terminal ileum is thought to be pathophysiologically responsible for type 2 diabetes remission after obesity surgery. Imitating this effect, ileal transposition (IT) is designed as initiating diabetes remission for non-obese patients. AIM: To date, it is not clear which length of the transposed segment achieves the best glucose lowering results. As previous rodent data mostly rely on a 10 cm IT, the current study evaluated a long segment IT (20 cm) in the diabetic obese Zucker rat. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty male diabetic obese Zucker rats (Crl:ZUC-Lepr(fa)) were randomly assigned to undergo either a long segment (20 cm; ∼ 50% of ileum) IT or sham surgery. Glucose control was determined by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on day -7, 0, 14 and 20. Analysis of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY) and insulin was included in the first and third OGTT. RESULTS: Ileal transposition animals showed an early improvement of glucose control after 14 days (area under the curve: IT vs. baseline 314.7 ±229.0 mmol/l × min vs. 564.6 ±268.5 mmol/l × min; p < 0.05). Compared to sham animals, glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and PYY levels were raised (5.75 ±3.73 pmol/l vs. 18.52 ±14.22 pmol/l, p < 0.05; 129.7 ±64.62 pmol/l vs. 164.0 ±62.26 pmol/l, p < 0.05). Body weight gain from postoperative day 5 was greater for sham animals (50.22 ±20.93 γ vs. 16.4 ±25.93 g; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Long segment IT shows a rapid rise in GLP-1 and PYY levels, thus leading to early amelioration of glucose control.

Duodeno-enteral omega switches - more physiological techniques in metabolic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: In bariatric surgery, still new surgical techniques are developed. On the one hand, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common procedures used. However, many patients experience dumping syndrome or pain due to bile reflux. On the other hand, revisions after gastric banding are frequent and may be technically challenging. AIM: To create a new bariatric procedure counterbalancing the drawbacks of conventional RYGB, also suitable as a redo option after gastric banding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To diminish the complication rate and pathophysiological disadvantages in reoperations after gastric banding, we primarily combined a gastric plication (GP) with a single anastomosis duodeno-ileal omega switch (DIOS), bypassing 2/3 of the total bowel length. Further on, in patients with lower body mass index we combined a GP or LSG and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with a duodeno-jejunal omega switch (DJOS), performing an end-to side anastomosis after 1/3 of the total bowel length. RESULTS: The DIOS and DJOS techniques restrict food intake and bypass the duodenum and part (DJOS) or the whole (DIOS) jejunum. Restriction is achieved either through gastric plicature or conventional sleeve gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Similar bariatric and metabolic effects to proximal RYGB are expected in the case of DJOS, or to a conventional duodenal switch when performing a DIOS procedure. Performing a gastric plicature will reduce the risk of gastric leak when revising patients after failed gastric banding.

Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of revisionary and secondary bariatric operations have been performed in recent years, with the number of operations doubling each year at the authors' center. Diagnostics, indications, and most revisionary operations should be performed by an experienced bariatric surgeon. This study was undertaken to evaluate indications and outcomes of revisionary bariatric operations at a specialized center. METHODS: At the Centre of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery (University of Freiburg, Germany), 100 consecutive revisionary bariatric operations performed between March 2007 and September 2009 were analyzed concerning indications and outcomes. RESULTS: Only 9 of the 100 revisions were due to early complications (<30 days after the primary operation). The indication for most revisions was poor weight loss (n = 55). A mean body mass index reduction of 10 points could be achieved in 1 year, which equals a 56% excess weight loss (EWL). No significant difference in weight reduction between restrictive and malabsorptive revisions was observed. Revisions due to implant-related problems also were frequent (n = 25). Laparoscopic revision was possible in 95% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Insufficient weight loss is the most frequent indication for revisionary bariatric surgery. The surgery can be performed laparoscopically in most cases, and a significant EWL (> 50%) can be achieved in 1 year if the right revisionary procedure is chosen.

Banded sleeve gastrectomy using the GaBP ring--surgical technique.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been described as the first step of a two-step laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) in extremely obese patients. It has also been used as an independent bariatric procedure. Recently a banded sleeve gastrectomy using human dermis was published. Gastric sleeve dilatation is one of the unfavorable postoperative courses that may limit weight loss. Our technique of a banded sleeve gastrectomy using the GaBP Ring Autolock(TM) System to calibrate the sleeve and prevent distal sleeve dilatation is described in this article.

Three-dimensional stomach analysis with computed tomography after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: sleeve dilation and thoracic migration.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is frequently performed as a definitive bariatric procedure today. Quantitative data on the detailed anatomy of the stomach after LSG are yet sparse. METHODS: Thirty-two multislice computed tomography (MSCT) data sets acquired in 27 LSG patients (22 female, 5 male) with a dedicated examination protocol and post-processing were evaluated for gastric volume, stomach length, sleeve length, antrum length, staple line length, and maximum cross-sectional sleeve area. Obtained parameters were compared to time after surgery, weight loss, and the occurrence of postsurgical regurgitation. RESULTS: Mean gastric volume was 186.5±88.4 ml. Gastric volume correlated significantly with the time interval after surgery. Sleeve sizes of 105.3±30.2 ml during early follow-up confirmed correct primary sizing of the sleeve, whereas marked dilation to 196.8±84.3 ml was found in patients with a follow-up of 6 months and longer (p=0.038). Sleeve area and staple line length were also positively correlated with time after surgery. No correlation was found between gastric volume and excess weight loss. In ten patients an intrathoracic migration of the staple line could be noted, with four of these patients developing persistent regurgitation after LSG. Regurgitation was present in only 2 of 17 patients without sleeve herniation. CONCLUSION: Multislice computed tomography allows for a comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of the anatomy after LSG and thus provides new insights in the process of sleeve dilation. Intrathoracic migration of the staple line could be identified as a possible cause of persistent regurgitation.

Time-resolved MRI after ingestion of liquids reveals motility changes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is generally considered a restrictive procedure. However, studies with nuclear medicine techniques have demonstrated that gastric motility changes occur following LSG. These motility changes could represent complementary mechanisms of weight loss. Therefore, we analyzed the stomach motility before and after LSG by means of dynamic MRI. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, five female patients with a mean BMI of 51.6 kg/m(2) underwent MRI 1 day before LSG and 6 days and 6 months after LSG. Dynamic steady-state free precession sequences were used to analyze the gastric motility after ingestion of 500 ml water with a temporal resolution of 0.86 s. Axial image stacks were also repeatedly acquired to determine the intragastric fluid volume over time. RESULTS: Mean excess body mass index loss was 60.6% after 6 months. Dynamic analysis showed that antral propulsive peristalsis was preserved immediately after surgery and during follow-up, but fold speed increased significantly from 2.7 mm/s before LSG to 4.4 mm/s after 6 months. The sleeve itself remained without recognizable peristalsis in three patients and showed only uncoordinated or passive motion in two patients. Consequently, the fluid transport through the sleeve was markedly delayed, whereas the antrum showed accelerated propulsion with the emptying half-time decreasing from 16.5 min preoperatively to 7.9 min 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the LSG procedure, the stomach is functionally divided into a sleeve without propulsive peristalsis and an accelerated antrum. Accelerated emptying seems to be caused by faster peristaltic folds.