An alternative route towards the fabrication of 2D blue phosphorene.

Blue phosphorene (BlueP) is a novel two-dimensional material that shares properties with black phosphorene and is potentially even more interesting for opto-electronic applications because of its layer dependent wide band gap of ≈ 2 to 3 eV and superior charge carrier mobility. It was first fabricated on Au(111), where, however, a network consisting of BlueP subunits and Au-linker atoms is formed. The physical properties of such an arrangement strongly differ from a freestanding BlueP monolayer. Here, we report on the growth of epitaxial BlueP on the Au(100) surface, which is an interesting alternative when aiming at quasi-freestanding BlueP domains. We find two different phosphorus phases by means of scanning tunneling microscopy and distortion-corrected low-energy electron diffraction. In the low coverage regime, we observe a commensurate (2 × 2) phase, whereas for higher coverage, a nearly hexagonal structure is formed. For the latter, the lattice parameters measured via atomically resolved scanning tunneling hydrogen microscopy closely resemble those of freestanding BlueP, and the typical height modulation of the phosphorus atoms is verified in our layers by means of x-ray photoelectron diffraction. We further analyze the chemical and electronic properties of these films by means of x-ray and (angle resolved) ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy.

A comparison of blind intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask FASTRACH™ and the intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™ a prospective randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The intubating laryngeal mask Fastrach™ is considered a gold standard for blind intubation as well as for fibreoptic guided intubation via a laryngeal mask. Recently, a single use version of the mask has been introduced. We compared the Fastrach single use with the new, low-priced single use intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™. We hypothesised that the LMA Ambu Aura-i and the LMA Fastrach are comparable with respect to success rates for mask placement and blind tracheal intubation through the LMA device. METHODS: A prospective, randomised clinical trial. University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, from April 2011 to April 2012. Eighty patients undergoing general anaesthesia with planned tracheal intubation were randomised and enrolled in the study. Blind intubation was performed with either laryngeal mask using two different tracheal tubes (Rüsch Super Safety Silk™ and LMA ETT™). A crossover-design was performed after an unsuccessful procedure. Primary outcome measure was the overall success rate of blind intubation. Secondary outcome measures were the time to the first adequate ventilation, a subjective handling score, and a fibreoptic control of placement, as well as the success rate of mask placement, time for mask removal after successful intubation, differences in airway leak pressure, and the incidence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. RESULTS: The success rate of tracheal intubation with the Fastrach for the first and second attempt was significantly better compared with the Ambu Aura-i. Tracheal intubation was also significantly faster (14.1 s. ±4.4 versus 21.3 s. ±9.0; p < 0.01), and the time interval for mask removal after successful intubation was significantly shorter using the Fastrach device (24.0 s. ±8.2 versus 29.4 s. ±7.5; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. CONCLUSION: Both laryngeal mask devices are suitable for ventilation and oxygenation. Blind intubation remains the domain of the LMA Fastrach, the Ambu Aura-i is not suitable for blind intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identification Number NCT03109678 , retrospectively registered on April 12, 2017.

Surgical pleth index: prospective validation of the score to predict moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Reported outcome benefits after surgical pleth index (SPI, GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) guided anaesthesia are conflicting. One potential explanation may be the lack of evidence for the selection of meaningful SPI target values. A recently published trial found an SPI cut-off of 30 as a 'best-fit' to predict moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain. This prospective trial was designed to validate this target and to investigate the influence of patient age on SPI in this context. METHODS: After ethics approval, 200 patients undergoing non-emergency surgery were enrolled. Data related to SPI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded for the last 5 min of surgery, just before arousal. After admission to recovery, pain scores (numeric rating scale [NRS], 0-10) were obtained every 5 min for 15 min. RESULTS: The data of 196 patients were analysed. Receiver-operating curve analysis showed a cut-off SPI value of 29 to be the optimum intraoperative target to discriminate between NRS 0-3 and 4-10. This confirms the 'best fit' cut-off for SPI published previously. Though still superior to HR and MAP, the sensitivity and specificity of the SPI were only poor. Age had no influence on the predictive accuracy of SPI. CONCLUSIONS: An SPI of approximately 30 was confirmed as having the best sensitivity/specificity to predict moderate-to-severe pain in the postanaesthesia care unit. However, the predictive accuracy was overall poor and not influenced by patient age. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617001475336.

Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness using CNAP™ technology is interchangeable with invasive arterial measurements during major open abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (FR), such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), have been shown to predict the response to a fluid challenge accurately. A recently introduced non-invasive technology based on the volume-clamp method (CNAP™) offers the ability to measure PPV continuously (PPVCNAP). However, the accuracy regarding the prediction of FR in the operating room has to be proved. METHODS: We compared PPVCNAP with an invasive approach measuring PPV using the PiCCO technology (PPVPiCCO). We studied 47 patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery before and after a passive leg-raising manoeuvre and i.v. fluid resuscitation. A positive response to a volume challenge was defined as ≥15% increase in stroke volume index obtained with transpulmonary thermodilution. Bootstrap methodology was used with the grey zone approach to determine the area of inconsistency regarding the ability of PPVPiCCO and PPVCNAP to predict FR. RESULTS: In response to the passive leg-raising manoeuvre, PPVPiCCO predicted FR with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 72% [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86] compared with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 72% (AUC 0.78) for PPVCNAP Regarding the volume challenge in the operating room, PPVPiCCO predicted FR with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100% (AUC 0.97) compared with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 93% (AUC 0.97) for PPVCNAP The grey zone approach identified a range of PPVPiCCO values (11-13%) and PPVCNAP values (7-11%) for which FR could not be predicted reliably. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive assessment of FR using PPVCNAP seems to be interchangeable with PPVPiCCO in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02166580.

Physiological Signal Processing for Individualized Anti-nociception Management During General Anesthesia: a Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to review existing technologies for the nociception / anti-nociception balance evaluation during surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: General anesthesia combines the use of analgesic, hypnotic and muscle-relaxant drugs in order to obtain a correct level of patient non-responsiveness during surgery. During the last decade, great efforts have been deployed in order to find adequate ways to measure how anesthetic drugs affect a patient's response to surgical nociception. Nowadays, though some monitoring devices allow obtaining information about hypnosis and muscle relaxation, no gold standard exists for the nociception / anti-nociception balance evaluation. Articles from the PubMed literature search engine were reviewed. As this paper focused on surgery under general anesthesia, articles about nociception monitoring on conscious patients, in post-anesthesia care unit or in intensive care unit were not considered. RESULTS: In this article, we present a review of existing technologies for the nociception / anti-nociception balance evaluation, which is based in all cases on the analysis of the autonomous nervous system activity. Presented systems, based on sensors and physiological signals processing algorithms, allow studying the patients' reaction regarding anesthesia and surgery. CONCLUSION: Some technological solutions for nociception / antinociception balance monitoring were described. Though presented devices could constitute efficient solutions for individualized anti-nociception management during general anesthesia, this review of current literature emphasizes the fact that the choice to use one or the other mainly relies on the clinical context and the general purpose of the monitoring.

Measurement of the nociceptive balance by Analgesia Nociception Index and Surgical Pleth Index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the nociception-anti-nociception balance during anesthesia is still challenging and routinely based on clinical criteria such as movement or vegetative response. Recently, the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) derived from heart rate variability and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) derived from photoplethysmographic signal were introduced for quantification of the analgesic component of anesthesia. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, we studied twenty-four patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective surgery during induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane and a stepwise increase of remifentanil effect site concentrations. Insertion of a laryngeal mask, tetanic stimulations as well as tracheal intubation were studied as nociceptive events. RESULTS: A total of 120 events were analysed. Both ANI and SPI enabled consistent detection of nociceptive events by significant changes (∆). Further, ∆ANI and ∆SPI significantly indicated patient's movement after tetanic stimulation with a prediction probability of 0.74 and 0.84. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive monitoring of ANI and SPI reflected nociceptive stimulation during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia and therefore may indicate the nociception - anti-nociception balance. Whether guidance of anesthesia by these variables will improve anesthesia care during surgery needs to be further evaluated.

Sufentanil administration guided by surgical pleth index vs standard practice during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of analgesia and antinociception during anaesthesia is still a challenging issue and routinely based on indirect and non-specific signs such as movement, tachycardia, or lacrimation. Recently, the surgical pleth index (SPI) derived by finger plethysmography was introduced to detect nociceptive stimulation during anaesthesia. While SPI guidance reduced the number of unwanted events during total i.v. anaesthesia (TIVA), the impact of SPI during volatile-based anaesthesia with intermittent opioid administration has not yet been elucidated. METHODS: Ninety-four patients were randomized into either SPI-guided analgesia or standard practice (Control). In both groups, anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane to keep bispectral index values between 40 and 60. In the SPI group, patients received a sufentanil bolus (10 µg) whenever SPI value increased above 50, whereas in the control group, sufentanil was administered according to standard clinical practice. The number of unwanted somatic events, haemodynamics, sufentanil consumption, and recovery times were recorded. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative unwanted somatic events was comparable between the groups (P=0.89). No significant differences with respect to hypotensive or hypertensive events were found. The mean (95% confidence interval) sufentanil consumption was non-significantly (P=0.07) reduced in the SPI group, 0.64 (0.57-0.71) vs 0.78 (0.64-0.91) µg min(-1). Recovery times were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil administration guided by SPI during sevoflurane anaesthesia is clinically feasible. In contrast to TIVA, it did not improve anaesthesia conduct with respect to unwanted somatic events, haemodynamic stability, sufentanil consumption, emergence time, or post-anaesthesia care unit care. Therefore, we conclude that anaesthesia regimen has an impact on beneficial effects by SPI guidance. Clinical trial registration NCT01525537. (Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov.).

Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception during anaesthesia is challenging and not yet clinically established. The Surgical pleth index (SPI), derived from photoplethysmography, was proposed as a surrogate measure of nociception. Recently, the analgesia nociception index (ANI) derived by heart rate (HR) variability was developed. The aim of the present study was to challenge the ability of ANI compared with SPI to detect standardized noxious stimulation during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. METHODS: After Ethics approval and informed consent, 25 patients were anaesthetized with propofol [bispectral index (BIS) 30-60]. A laryngeal mask (LMA) was inserted and remifentanil stepwise increased to effect-site concentrations (Ce(remi)) of 0, 2, and 4 ng ml(-1). At each step, tetanic stimulation (STIM) was applied. ANI, SPI, BIS, HR, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were obtained before and after LMA insertion and each STIM. Analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank tests and calculation of prediction probabilities (P(K)). RESULTS: ANI and SPI, but not BIS, HR, or MAP, were significantly (P<0.05) changed at all examined steps. ANI response to STIM was (median [IQR]) -24 [-12-35], -30 [-20 - -40] and -13 [-5 - -27] at 0, 2 and 4 ng ml(-1) Ce(remi). However, prediction of movement to STIM was not better than by chance, as P(K) values were 0.41 (0.08) for ANI and 0.62 (0.08) for SPI. CONCLUSIONS: The two variables, ANI and SPI, enabled consistent reflection of stimulation during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Nevertheless, ANI and SPI may improve detection but not prediction of a possible inadequate nociception-anti-nociception balance. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier. NCT01522508.

A comparison of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure with invasive radial and femoral pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive continous monitoring of finger arterial pressure has gained increasing interest. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of non-invasive reconstructed brachial artery pressure by the Nexfin™ device (NFAP) with invasive femoral (IFAP) and radial (IRAP) artery pressure before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for elective coronary surgery were studied before and after CPB, respectively. Each patient was monitored with the non-invasive system, and both an indwelling femoral and radial arterial catheter. A passive leg raising maneuver was also performed before and after CPB. Measurements included mean (MAP), systolic (SAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure by NFAP (MAP,SAP,DAP(NFAP)), IFAP (MAP,SAP,DAP(IFAP)) and IRAP (MAP,SAP,DAP(IRAP)). Percentage changes of MAP for all measurement sites were also calculated. RESULTS: There was a moderate correlation between MAP(NFAP) and MAP(IFAP) both before (r=0.64, P<0.0001) and after (r=0.57, P<0.0001) CPB, with a percentage error (PE) of 29% and 27%, respectively. Correlation coefficients between MAP(NFAP) and MAP(IRAP) were r=0.53, P<0.0001 (PE 34%) before and r=0.54, P<0.0001 (PE 29%) after CPB. There was a significant correlation in percentage changes between ∆MAP(NFAP) and ∆MAP(IFAP) before (r=0.70, P<0.0001) and after (r=0.71, P<0.0001) CPB and for ∆MAP(NFAP) and ∆MAP(IRAP) (r=0.67, P<0.0001; r=0.74, P<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive, reconstructed brachial artery pressure showed moderate correlation compared with both invasive femoral and radial artery pressure. Furthermore, the non-invasive monitoring system was able to reflect percentage changes in mean arterial pressure in a moderate fashion.

The effect of posture and anaesthetic technique on the surgical pleth index.

The surgical pleth index has been shown to correlate with surrogate variables of nociception during general anaesthesia, and it has been suggested to be of use as a depth of anaesthesia monitor. However, little is known about confounding factors. As the main determining variables are based on both central and peripheral autonomic regulatory mechanisms, we hypothesised that changing a patient`s posture may produce a marked effect. We studied the effects of posture change in 45 patients who were randomly assigned to receive general (n = 15) or spinal anaesthesia with (n = 15) or without sedation (n = 15), as well as 15 awake volunteers. Mean (SD) values of the surgical pleth index after adoption of the lithotomy position were reduced from 57 (22) to 21 (6) under general anaesthesia, 63 (15) to 31 (9) under spinal anaesthesia alone, and 52 (14) to 22 (8) under spinal anaesthesia with sedation (all p < 0.01). In healthy volunteers, the surgical pleth index increased from 37 (13) to 57 (11) (p < 0.01) after 30° head-up tilt and was reduced from 35 (11) to 25 (11) after head-down tilt (p < 0.05). Change in posture has a marked effect on the surgical pleth index which lasts for at least 45 min, and this must be considered when interpreting the displayed values.

A comparison of the Nexfin® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery.

The newly introduced Nexfin(®) device allows analysis of the blood pressure trace produced by a non-invasive finger cuff. We compared the cardiac output derived from the Nexfin and PiCCO, using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution, during cardiac surgery. Forty patients with preserved left ventricular function undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were studied after induction of general anaesthesia and until discharge to the intensive care unit. There was a significant correlation between Nexfin and PiCCO before (r(2) = 0.81, p < 0.001) and after (r(2) = 0.56, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated the mean bias of Nexfin to be -0.1 (95% limits of agreement -0.6 to +0.5, percentage error 23%) and -0.1 (-0.8 to +0.6, 26%) l.min(-1).m(-2), before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively. After a passive leg-raise was performed, there was also good correlation between the two methods, both before (r(2) = 0.72, p < 0.001) and after (r(2) = 0.76, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. We conclude that the Nexfin is a reliable method of measuring cardiac output during and after cardiac surgery.

Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index.

This prospective study assessed whether respiratory variations in velocity time integral, peak blood flow velocity and non-invasive pleth variability index are useful measurements in infants undergoing congenital heart surgery and determined threshold values that may help guide fluid administration. In 27 infants receiving mechanical ventilation, of mean (SD) weight 10.4 (6.3) kg, 13 increased their stroke volume index ≥ 15% following a fluid challenge and 14 did not. The best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was for the echocardiographic-derived variables respiratory variation in blood peak flow velocity (area under the ROC curve = 0.92; p = 0.0002) and respiratory variation of the velocity time integral (area under the ROC curve = 0.84; p = 0.002). The pleth variability index also predicted fluid responsiveness (area under the ROC curve = 0.79; p = 0.01), in contrast to heart rate (area under the ROC curve = 0.53; p = 0.75) and central venous pressure (area under the ROC curve = 0.57; p = 0.52).

Accuracy of the pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness depends on the perfusion index.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variations in plethysmographic waveform amplitudes derived from pulse oximetry are believed to predict fluid responsiveness. The non-invasive pleth variability index (PVI) is a variable based on the calculation of changes in the perfusion index (PI). The aim of the following study was to examine whether the predictive power of PVI depends on different values of PI. METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery were studied before operation: at baseline after induction of anaesthesia and during passive leg raising (PLR). Each patient was monitored with central venous pressure (CVP), the PiCCO monitor and the non-invasive Masimo monitoring system. Stroke volume index by transpulmonary thermodilution (SVI(TPTD)), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were measured using the PiCCO monitoring system. PI and PVI were obtained by pulse oximetry. RESULTS: Responders were defined to increase their SVI(TPTD) >15% after PLR. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was found for PPV (AUC: 0.83, P<0.0001) and SVV (AUC: 0.72, P=0.002), in contrast to PVI (AUC: 0.60, P=0.11) and CVP (AUC: 0.60, P=0.13). The accuracy of PVI to predict fluid responsiveness was improved on analysing patients with higher PI values. PI of about 4% (n=45) achieved statistical significance (AUC: 0.72, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: The PVI was not able to predict fluid responsiveness with sufficient accuracy. In patients with higher perfusion states, the PVI improved its ability to predict haemodynamic changes, strongly suggesting a relevant influence of the PI on the PVI.

Assessment of left ventricular systolic function during acute myocardial ischemia: a comparison of transpulmonary thermodilution and transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: The PiCCO system provides different variables of cardiac function: the cardiac function index (CFI), the global ejection fraction (GEF) and the maximal pressure developed by the left ventricle (dP/dtMax). The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of these variables to predict impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) derived by transesophageal echocardiography during acute myocardial ischemia. METHODS: In this prospective experimental study, fifteen pigs (28-34 kg) were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated and subjected to left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery occlusion. PiCCO-derived variables and LVEF were obtained 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after LAD occlusion. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the ability of PiCCO-derived parameters to estimate LVEF ≤40% and ≤50%. RESULTS: LAD occlusion induced a decrease in PiCCO-derived variables and LVEF (P<0.001 for each). Significant correlations were found between LVEF and CFI (r=0.59, P<0.001), GEF (r=0.64, P<0.001), dP/dtMax (r=0.36, P<0.001), and cardiac output (r=0.25, P=0.028). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the estimation of LVEF ≤40% and ≤50% was 0.80 and 0.79 for CFI (P=0.009, P<0.001), 0.86 and 0.78 for GEF (P=0.002, P<0.001), 0.76 and 0.68 for dP/dtMax (P=0.033, P=0.012), and 0.57 and 0.58 for cardiac output (P=0.554, P=0.259). CONCLUSION: Cardiac function indices permit the bedside quantification of left ventricular systolic function during acute myocardial ischemia in pigs. Therefore, the PiCCO system may represent a valuable technique for cardiovascular monitoring, particularly for detecting acute left ventricular systolic dysfunction due to myocardial ischemia.

Evaluation of the surgical stress index during spinal and general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Although in modern anaesthesia, monitoring depth of anaesthesia and quality of neuromuscular block are routine, monitoring of analgesia still remains challenging. Recently, the surgical stress index (SSI), derived from finger photoplethysmographic signal, was introduced as a surrogate variable reflecting the nociception-antinociception balance. This study aimed at evaluating the SSI in patients undergoing regional anaesthesia either alone or combined with sedation compared with patients undergoing general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: Seventy-one patients undergoing general (n=24) or spinal anaesthesia with (n=24) or without sedation (n=23) were included. SSI was measured the day before surgery and at defined time points during anaesthesia and surgery and also in the recovery room. SSI was compared with haemodynamic variables like heart rate and systolic arterial pressure. RESULTS: The SSI was higher in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia [mean 65, CI (59.3-70.5)] compared with GA [48 (39.9-56.4), P<0.01], and baseline [41 (37.3-44.2), P<0.001]. During spinal anaesthesia with sedation [44 (36.2-50.9)], it was comparable with the baseline level (P>0.05). In comparison with baseline, SSI in the recovery room was higher in patients after GA [59 (48.4-67.9), P<0.025] but not after spinal anaesthesia [53 (47.6-60.1), P>0.05] or after spinal anaesthesia with sedation [54 (45.8-65.1), P>0.05]. Changes of the SSI were not reflected by changes of haemodynamic variables. CONCLUSIONS: In fully awake patients under spinal anaesthesia, the SSI does not reflect the nociception-antinociception balance. This may be due to the influence of mental stress on the sympathetic nervous system. Even light sedation attenuates these influences.

Surgical stress index in response to pacemaker stimulation or atropine.

BACKGROUND: The surgical stress index (SSI) is a new monitoring tool for the assessment of nociception during general anaesthesia. It is calculated based on the heart beat interval and the pulse wave amplitude. Correlation of SSI with nociceptive stimuli and opioid effect-site concentrations has been demonstrated, but the influence of isolated modulation of heart rate (HR) on SSI is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on SSI of atropine administration and cardiac pacing. METHODS: In 18 anaesthetized ASA III ICU patients, either repetitive cardiac pacemaker stimulation or administration of atropine (10 microg kg(-1)) was performed, and the effect on SSI, arterial pressure, spectral entropy, and bispectral index was analysed. RESULTS: Cardiac pacing at 100 beats min(-1) was followed by an increase in SSI from 26 [17-35 (10-41)] to 59 [53-72 (48-78)] {median [inter-quartile range (range)]} (P=0.0006), whereas other variables remained unaffected. Also, atropine administration increased SSI from 27 [20-34 (16-39)] to 58 [48-70 (41-81)] (P=0.007) without significant effect on other variables except HR. A recalibration of SSI during cardiac pacing leads to a significant decrease in SSI to 49 [40-52 (36-57)] (P=0.03), whereas recalibration after atropine administration had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: SSI values measured in patients receiving atropine or in patients with pacemakers should be interpreted cautiously.

Differences between bispectral index and spectral entropy during xenon anaesthesia: a comparison with propofol anaesthesia.

We enrolled 114 patients, aged 65-83 years, undergoing elective surgery (duration > 2h) into a randomised, controlled study to evaluate the performance of bispectral index and spectral entropy for monitoring depth of xenon versus propofol anaesthesia. In the propofol group, bispectral index and state entropy values were comparable. In the xenon group, bispectral index values resembled those in the propofol group, but spectral entropy levels were significantly lower. Mean arterial blood pressure was higher and heart rate was lower in the xenon group than in the propofol group. Bispectral index and spectral entropy considerably diverged during xenon but not during propofol anaesthesia. We therefore conclude that these measures are not interchangeable for the assessment of depth of hypnosis and that bispectral index is likely to reflect actual depth of anaesthesia more precisely compared with spectral entropy.

Correlation and agreement between the bispectral index vs. state entropy during hypothermic cardio-pulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: The bispectral index (BIS) and spectral entropy enable monitoring the depth of anaesthesia. Mild hypothermia has been shown to affect the ability of electroencephalography monitors to reflect the anaesthetic drug effect. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hypothermia during a cardio-pulmonary bypass on the correlation and agreement between the BIS and entropy variables compared with normothermic conditions. METHODS: This prospective clinical study included coronary artery bypass grafting patients (n=25) evaluating correlation and agreement (Bland-Altman analysis) between the BIS and both spectral and response entropy during a hypothermic cardio-pulmonary bypass (31-34 degrees C) compared with nomothermic conditions (34-37.5 degrees C). Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol and sufentanil and adjusted clinically, while the anaesthetist was blinded to the monitors. RESULTS: The BIS and entropy values decreased during cooling (P<0.05), but the decrease was more pronounced for entropy variables compared with BIS (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients (bias+/-SD; percentage error) between the BIS vs. spectral state entropy and response entropy were r(2)=0.56 (1+/-11; 42%) and r(2)=0.58 (-2+/-11; 43%) under normothermic conditions, and r(2)=0.17 (10+/-12; 77%) and r(2)=0.18 (9+/-11; 68%) under hypothermic conditions, respectively. Bias was significantly increased under hypothermic conditions (P<0.001 vs. normothermia). CONCLUSION: Acceptable agreement was observed between the BIS and entropy variables under normothermic but not under hypothermic conditions. The BIS and entropy variables may therefore not be interchangeable during a hypothermic cardio-pulmonary bypass.