ABSTRACT
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is the most abundant steroid hormone in primates, which is predominantly synthesized in the adrenal cortex. A characteristic curve of growth and decline of its synthesis during life was observed, together with the corresponding formation of its sulphate ester (DHEAS). High levels of plasma circulating DHEA are suggested as a marker of human longevity, and various pathophysiological conditions lead to a decreased DHEA level, including adrenal insufficiency, severe systemic diseases, acute stress, and anorexia. More recent studies have established the importance of DHEA in the central nervous system (CNS). A specific intranuclear receptor for DHEA has not yet been identified; however, highly specific membrane receptors have been detected in endothelial cells, the heart, kidney, liver, and the brain. Research shows that DHEA and DHEAS, as well as their metabolites, have a wide range of effects on numerous organs and organ systems, which places them in the group of potential pharmacological agents useful in various clinical entities. Their action as neurosteroids is especially interesting due to potential neuroprotective, pro-cognitive, anxiolytic, and antidepressant effects. Evidence from clinical studies supports the use of DHEA in hypoadrenal individuals and in treating depression and associated cognitive disorders. However, there is also an increasing trend of recreational DHEA misuse in healthy people, as it is classified as a dietary supplement in some countries. This article aims to provide a critical review regarding the biological and pharmacological effects of DHEA, its mechanism of action, and potential therapeutic use, especially in CNS disorders.
Subject(s)
Dehydroepiandrosterone , Endothelial Cells , Animals , Humans , Dehydroepiandrosterone/pharmacology , Dehydroepiandrosterone/therapeutic use , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/metabolism , Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/pharmacology , Brain/metabolism , SteroidsABSTRACT
A majority of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have tendency of a good recovery. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of the disease 1 and 3 years after GBS symptom onset. METHODS: During 2014, GBS was diagnosed in 82 patients in seven tertiary healthcare centers. Neurological follow-up was conducted in 57 (70%) patients after 1 year, and in 54 (66%) after 3 years. Functional disability was estimated according to the GBS disability scale (GDS), with a score of 0-3 indicating mild disability and a score of 4-6 indicating severe disability during acute phase, whereas a score >1 indicated poor recovery on follow-ups. Visual analog scale was used to assess sensory symptoms and musculoskelatal pain, and Krupp's Fatigue Severity Scale was used to asses fatigue. RESULTS: Poor functional outcome was found in 39% of GBS patients at year 1 and 30% at year 3. Paresthesias/dysesthesias were detected in 60% of patients after 1 year and 43% after 3 years. Musculoskeletal pain was present in 40% of patients at year 1 and 33% at year 3. Significant fatigue after 1 year was found in 21% of subjects and after 3 years in 7%. Parameters associated with poor functional outcome after 1 year were age >55 years (p=0.05), severe disability at admission (p1 indique une récupération difficile au moment des suivis. L'échelle visuelle analogue (EVA) a aussi été utilisée pour évaluer leurs symptômes sensoriels et leurs douleurs musculo-squelettiques. Enfin, l'échelle de gravité de la fatigue de Krupp a été utilisée pour évaluer leur degré de fatigue. Résultats: La première année, on a observé une piètre amélioration des capacités fonctionnelles chez 39% des patients atteints du SGB; pour la troisième année, cette proportion était de 30%. Au bout d'un an, on a aussi détecté la présence de paresthésie/dysesthésie chez 60% des patients; pour la troisième année, cette proportion était de 43%. Des douleurs musculo-squelettiques ont été rapportées chez 40% des patients après un an; deux ans plus tard, ce pourcentage chutait à 33%. Enfin, un état de fatigue important a été noté chez 21% des patients au bout d'un an; ce pourcentage n'était plus que de 7% au bout de trois ans. Les paramètres associés à une piètre amélioration des capacités fonctionnelles au bout d'un an étaient l'âge (>55 ans; p=0,05) ainsi qu'une incapacité sévère au moment de leur admission (p<0,05) et de leur congé (p<0,01). Au bout de trois ans, une piètre amélioration des capacités fonctionnelles était associée au sexe masculin (p<0,05) et à une incapacité sévère au moment d'obtenir un congé (p=0,06). CONCLUSIONS: Un an et trois ans après l'apparition des premiers symptômes du SGB, un nombre important de patients donnaient à voir des séquelles neurologiques, ce qui incluait une forme ou une autre d'incapacité fonctionnelle, des symptômes sensoriels, des douleurs et un état de fatigue.
