Publication performance of university maxillofacial surgeons in Germany.

The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to benchmark the publication activities of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The publication performance of staff surgeons (chief and consultants), documented by first or last authorship, from 37 German university departments was captured over a 10-year period (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019). All publications listed in PubMed were included. Additionally, the Impact Factor (IF) was determined. A total of 213 surgeons were identified, of whom 158 (74.2%) were publishing. The number of publications was 1,777, published in 311 journals. Publication activity ranged from an average of 23.3 publications per staff surgeon in the top-ranked department to 0 publications in the last-ranked. The same trend was observed for the total cumulative IFs (CIFs) per member (range from 56.2 to 0). The most common used journal was the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (19.7%), with focus on "dentoalveolar surgery" (24%) and "operative techniques and procedures" (28.3%). Women constituted 19.2% of the staff, contributing to 8.5% of the publications. The publication performance of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery exhibits a high variance, which did not correlate with the number of personnel and could only be explained by different research motivations.

[Inpatient rehabilitation for patients 65 years and older with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Indications and long-term outcome]. / Stationäre Frührehabilitation nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung eines Bauchaortenaneurysmas bei über 65-Jährigen: Indikation und langfristiges Outcome.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, there is no data available on the frequency of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) after elective endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. OBJECTIVE: To report for the first time on the outcome of patients 65 years and older and thus of retirement age with and without IR after AAA repair in a retrospective analysis of routine data from all eleven regional companies of the AOK health insurance fund (AOK-Gesundheit). METHODS: Anonymized data of 16,358 patients 65 years and older with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with EVAR (n = 12,960) or OAR (n = 3,398) between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2016 were analyzed. Patients with postoperative IR (n = 1,531) were compared to those without postoperative IR (n = 14,827) with respect to general patient characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and survival. The average follow-up of patients with postoperative and without postoperative IR was 49.9 months and 51.8 months, respectively. RESULTS: 5.4% of EVAR patients, but 24.6% of OAR patients were referred to IR (p < 0.001). Patients with IR were sicker than those without IR. Parameters significantly influencing the use of IR included OAR vs EVAR (Odds Ratio [OR] 6.03), condition after cerebral infarction (OR 1.53), and women vs men (OR 1.49). Perioperative influencing parameters were cerebral infarction (OR 2.40), blood transfusions (OR 2.21) and complex critical care (OR 2.15). After nine years, the Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 41.9% for patients with vs 43.4% for those without IR in the EVAR group (p = 0.178). For OAR, it was 50.2% for patients with IR vs 49.8% for patients without IR (p = 0.006). In multivariate regression analysis, postoperative IR had a significant effect on long-term survival in OAR but not in EVAR patients. CONCLUSION: There are no generally binding guidelines for the indication of IR after AAA repair. It should therefore be a requirement for the future that the fitness of each patient with elective AAA repair be determined with a score before and after the procedure in order to make indications for AHB more comparable. The score should be documented in the hospital discharge letter.

Long-term outcome and cancer incidence after lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia.

PURPOSE: The influence of cancer development on long-term outcome after lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia was investigated. METHODS: Patient survival and cancer incidence were recorded for 21,082 patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) stage III (n = 5631; 26.7%) and stage IV (n = 15,451; 73.3%) registered with the AOK health insurance company in Germany who underwent infrainguinal bypass surgery. All patients were preoperative and in their history cancer-free. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 44 months, 25.6% of all patients developed cancer (Kaplan-Meier estimated), with no significant differences between patients with PAD stage III and IV (cancer incidence stage III 25.7%, stage IV 25.5%; p = 0.421). In the Cox regression analysis, male gender (HR 1.885; 95% CI 1.714-2.073, p < 0.001) and age over 70 years (HR 1.399; 95% CI 1.285-1.522, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for the development of cancer. Survival was significantly lower in stage IV (23.4%) compared to stage III (44.5%) (HR 1.720; 95% CI 1.645-1.799, p < 0.001). Cancer was a significant risk factor for overall survival in PAD stage III patients (HR: 1.326; 95% CI 1.195-1.471, p < 0.001) but not in PAD stage IV (HR 0.976; 95% CI 0.919-1.037, p = 0.434). CONCLUSION: Patients with PAD stage III have significantly better survival after infrainguinal bypass surgery compared to patients with stage IV. While cancer incidence was essential for survival in stage III, it was of no importance in stage IV.

The Treatment of Patients With an Unruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and a Concomitant Malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Having cancer adversely effects the outcome of treatment for an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: A retrospective secondary analysis was performed on the basis of anonymized data from AOK, a German nationwide statutory healthinsurance carrier. Data were evaluated from all of the 20 683 patients who underwent either endovascular (EVAR, 15 792) or open surgical (OAR, 4891) treatment for an unruptured AAA in the years 2010-2016. It was determined in each case whether the patient had a known cancer at the time of the procedure to treat AAA. The analysis concerned patient characteristics, periprocedural complications, and survival after the procedure up to 31 December 2018. RESULTS: 18 222 patients were free of cancer. In accordance with the known 6:1 sex ratio of AAA, 85.3% of the cancer-free patients and 92.8% of those with cancer were men. At the time of their AAA procedure, 1398 had cancer of the intestine (n = 318), lung (n = 301), prostate (n = 380), or bladder or ureter (n = 399). One-year survival after the AAA procedure was 91.5% in cancer-free patients and 84%, 74.4%, 85.8%, and 85.5% in the patients with the respective types of cancer just mentioned. Having cancer was a significant risk factor for periprocedural mortality (OR 1.326, p = 0.041) and for long-term survival (HR 1.515; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Having cancer is a risk factor for periprocedural mortality and long-term survival in patients undergoing treatment for an unruptured AAA. This implies that the indications for surgery should be considered with care, particularly in patients with lung cancer, whose 5-year survival rate is only 37.2%.

Long-Term Outcome of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular or Open Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been established as a standard treatment option for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and gained importance due to a lower perioperative mortality than open repair (OAR). However, whether this survival advantage can be maintained or if OAR is beneficial in terms of long-term complications and reinterventions remains questionable. DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study data from patients undergoing elective EVAR or OAR for iAAAs in the years 2010-2016 was analyzed. The patients were followed through 2018. METHODS: In the propensity score matched cohorts the perioperative and long-term outcomes of the patients were assessed. We identified 20 683 patients undergoing elective iAAA repair (76.4% EVAR). The propensity matched cohorts included 4886 pairs of patients. RESULTS: The perioperative mortality was 1.9% for EVAR and 5.9% for OAR (P = <.001). The perioperative mortality was mainly influenced by patients age (Odds-Ratio (OR):1.073, confidence interval (CI):1.058-1.088, P ≤ .001) and OAR (OR:3.242, CI:2.552-4.119, P ≤ .001). The early survival benefit after endovascular repair persisted for approximately 3 years (estimated survival EVAR 82.3%, OAR 80.9%, P = .021). After that time the estimated survival curves were similar. After 9 years the estimated survival was 51.2% after EVAR as compared to 52.8% after OAR (P = .102). The operation method didn't influence long-term survival significantly (Hazard-Ratio (HR): 1.046, CI: .975-1.122, P = .211). The vascular reintervention rate was 17.4% in the EVAR cohort and 7.1% in the OAR cohort (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: EVAR has a significantly lower perioperative mortality than OAR, a survival benefit that lasts up to 3 years after intervention. Thereafter, no significant difference in survival was observed between EVAR and OAR. The decision between EVAR or OAR may depend on patient preference, surgeons' experience, and the institutions' ability to handle complications.

[Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis]. / Langzeitergebnisse nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung des rupturierten Bauchaortenaneurysmas ­ eine Propensity-Score-Analyse.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective propensity score matched study presents the perioperative mortality and long-term survival up to 9 years after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Germany using health insurance data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2170 patients treated between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2016, for rAAA within 24 hours of hospital admission and receiving blood transfusions were enrolled in the study and tracked until December 31st, 2018. For better comparability of EVAR and OAR, a 1:1 propensity score matching with 624 pairs according to patient age, sex and comorbidities was carried out using the R program (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS: In the unadjusted groups, 29.1% (631/2170) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 70.9% (1539/2170) with OAR. EVAR patients had a significantly higher overall rate of comorbidities. After adjustment, EVAR patients showed significantly better perioperative survival (EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000). Perioperative complications occurred in 80.4% of EVAR patients and 80.3% of OAR patients (p = 1.000). At the end of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated that 15.2% of patients survived after EVAR vs. 19.5% after OAR (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, OAR, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes mellitus type 2 and renal failure stages 3 to 5 had a negative impact on overall survival. Patients treated on weekdays had a significantly lower perioperative mortality than patients treated during the weekend (perioperative mortality on weekdays 40.6% vs. 53.4% during the weekend; p = 0.000) and a better overall survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier. CONCLUSION: Significantly better perioperative and overall survival was observed with EVAR than with OAR in patients with rAAA. The perioperative survival benefit of EVAR was also found in patients older than 80 years. Female gender had no significant influence on perioperative mortality and overall survival. Patients treated on weekends had a significantly poorer perioperative survival than patients treated on weekdays, and this lasted through the end of follow-up. The extent to which this was dependent on hospital structure was unclear.

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Areas, Publication Hierarchy and Gender Authorship in German University Orthopaedic Surgery. / Bibliometrische Analyse von Forschungsgebieten, Publikationshierarchie und Autorengeschlecht der deutschen universitären Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present bibliometric study was to record the focus of publications, type of study and publication activities depending on the hierarchy level and gender of the authors of German university departments for orthopaedic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The publication performance of the staff surgeons, consisting of chief and senior physicians, section and division heads of 39 German university departments of orthopaedic surgery university hospitals, was recorded over a period of 10 years (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019). All publications were considered that were listed in PubMed and for which the staff surgeons were first or last authors. In addition, the impact factor (IF) and the h-index were determined. RESULTS: 1739 (39.2%) publications were compiled by 180 staff surgeons of university departments for trauma surgery and 2699 (60.8%) publications by 343 surgeons in departments of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. Most publications were related to injuries or impairments of the lower extremity including the hip (n = 1626; 38.1%), followed by the upper extremity (n = 737; 17.3%). These publications focussed on diagnostic testing (25.5%), surgical techniques (19.1%) or special osteosyntheses (16.9%). The highest average IF per publication was achieved by publications on plastics (IF 2.02), on outcome (IF 1.96) and on diagnostic testing (IF 1.93). Heads of departments were first authors in 18.8%, senior physicians with management functions in 40.7% and senior physicians without management functions in 69% of papers and last authors in 81.2%, 49.3% and 31.0% of articles, respectively. 64 of 523 staff surgeons (12.2%) were women. 306 authors (6.1%) were women, corresponding to 4.8 authorships per female surgeon - significantly for male surgeons (10.3 authorships per male surgeon). CONCLUSION: In the present study, among senior physicians with a management function, the share of publishing surgeons was 59.1% for women, but 85.5% for men. In contrast, in the group of senior physicians without management function female and male surgeons were almost equally represented (57.5% vs. 60.5%). It must therefore be asked whether the work life balance is more difficult to meet for women than for men with longer careers. Mentoring programs are required to support the publication activities of the increasing number of female applicants in the future.

Long-Term Outcome of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb-Threatening Ischaemia in Germany.

AIM: To present the short- and long-term outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), comparing diabetic (DM) and non-diabetic (non-DM) patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of anonymised data from a nationwide health insurance company (AOK). Data from 22,633 patients (DM: n = 7266; non-DM: n = 15,367; men: n = 14,523; women: n = 8110; mean patient age: 72.5 years), who underwent LEB from 2010 to 2015, were analysed. The cut-off date for follow-up was December 31, 2018 (mean follow-up period: 55 months). RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 10.0% for DM and 8.2% for non-DM (p < 0.001). Patients with crural/pedal bypasses (n = 8558) had a significantly higher perioperative mortality (10.3%) than those with above-the-knee (n = 7246; 5.8%; p < 0.001) and below-the-knee bypasses (n = 6829; 8.9%; p = 0.003). The 9-year survival rates in DM patients were significantly worse, at 21.5%, compared to non-DM, at 31.1% (p < 0.001). This applied to both PAD stage III (DM: 34.4%; non-DM: 45.7%; p < 0.001) and PAD stage IV (DM: 18.5%; non-DM: 25.0%; p < 0.001). Patients with crural/pedal bypasses had a significantly inferior survival rate (25.5%) compared to those with below-the-knee (27.7%; p < 0.001) and above-the-knee bypasses (31.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative and long-term outcomes regarding survival and major amputation rate for CLTI patients undergoing LEB are consistently worse for DM patients compared to non-DM patients.

[Perioperative lethality after endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: An analysis of administrative data of the AOK health insurance fund]. / Zur perioperativen Letalität des rupturierten Bauchaortenaneurysmas nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung: eine Analyse von Routinedaten der AOK Gesundheit.

OBJECTIVE: In this paper we will report the perioperative outcome after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) in Germany based on data of the AOK health insurance fund. METHODS: Anonymised data of all patients with rAAA (n = 3,227) who were treated from 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2016 were analysed, using SPSS 27 (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Ehningen, Germany). RESULTS: 41.9% (1,353/3,227) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 58.1% (1,874/3,227) with OAR. Patients ≥80 years made up 38.4% for EVAR and 32.9% for OAR (p = 0.002). The proportion of patients undergoing surgery within 24 hours after admission was significantly higher for OAR (87.8%) than for EVAR (73.0%) (p = 0.000). The perioperative lethality rate for OAR was 42.4%, and thus almost twice as high as for EVAR with 21.3% (p = 0.000). Women had higher perioperative lethality rates for both EVAR (perioperative lethality 24.6%) and OAR (perioperative lethality 51.7%) compared to men with 20.6% (EVAR) and 40.2% (OAR), respectively. With EVAR, 35.8% of the patients showed a complication-free postoperative course, with OAR it was 17.7% (p = 0.000). Blood transfusions (whole blood, red cell concentrates, and autotransfusions) were administered in 57.6% of the patients with EVAR, but in 92.3% with OAR (p = 0.000). The highest perioperative lethality was found in EVAR and OAR patients who received both surgery within 24 hours after admission and blood transfusions (perioperative lethality EVAR 36.0%, OAR 46.0%; p = 0.000). In contrast, patients who did not require blood transfusions and were treated later than 24 hours after admission had the lowest perioperative lethality with 3.2% for EVAR vs. 5.4% for OAR (p = 0.623). CONCLUSION: The data confirm the observation that the perioperative mortality of rAAA patients is lower with EVAR than with OAR. However, strict attention must be paid to the time of the intervention. The low perioperative lethality of patients who were treated later than 24 hours after hospital admission and who did not require blood transfusions indicates that cases of symptomatic AAA without rupture have also been recorded in this administrative database under the diagnosis rAAA. One point of criticism is that the decision not to adjust for the patient groups with EVAR and with OAR in order to be able to better analyse the properties of routine data includes a considerable risk of bias in the statements of this work due to confounding variables.

Publication Performance in German Academic Heart Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the publication performance of management teams consisting of chief and senior physicians in German university cardiac surgery units over a 10-year period and to facilitate benchmarking. METHODS: The cutoff date for consideration of staffing from the unit Web site and publications was July 1, 2017. The literature search was based on an evaluation of the PubMed database. The 5-year impact factor (IF) from 2016 was assigned to each journal. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred thirty-five publications (average IF 3.02) were registered, published in 323 journals. Of a total of 341 management team members, 235 (68.9%) published as first or last author over the 10-year period. The number of publications from the units divided into quintiles varied considerably with the first six units contributing 39.0% of all publications and the last nine units 9.4%. With a cumulative IF total of 3265, the publications of the first six units accounted for 42.7% of the cumulative IF, the last unit quintile amounted to 621 (8.1%) of the cumulative IF. When considering publications per managing member, the first quintile averaged 11.9 publications (29.6 IF) per managing member, the last quintile 3.3 publications (8.0 IF) per member. CONCLUSIONS: The six units of the first quintile published on average 3.6 times more per managing member than the nine units in the last quintile and the average cumulative IF per member in the first quintile was almost five times higher. Further investigation must show whether this considerable difference in publication activity between the university units is also observed in other operative fields.

Time trends of international English language publication activity by vascular surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical publication activity in the English-language literature during a 10-year interval could have changed. The present study sought to identify which countries have made the most contributions and whether significant shifts have occurred during a 10-year period. METHODS: The study design was a retrospective study. Screening of 15 international journals in PubMed was performed for the 2006 to 2007 and 2016 to 2017 for studies reported by a first author belonging to a vascular surgery department. Data were collected by country regarding the total number of publications, cumulative impact factors (IFs), publications per inhabitant, IFs per inhabitant, and number of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews per country in both periods. RESULTS: A total of 975 and 1459 reports were found for 2006 to 2007 and 2016 to 2017, respectively. For 2006 to 2007, most reports (n = 400; 41.0%; 1308.3 IFs) had come from the United States, followed by the United Kingdom (n = 168; 17.2%; 462.3 IFs) and The Netherlands (n = 74; 7.6%; 182.6 IFs). For 2016 to 2017, the United States led again with 607 articles (41.6%; 1968.0 IFs), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 119; 8.2%; 640.5 IFs) and The Netherlands (n = 107; 7.3%; 355.6 IFs). Of the top 15 countries, The Netherlands and Sweden contributed the most articles per inhabitant during both periods. During both periods, the United Kingdom reported the most randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons from the United States and United Kingdom were the most productive in terms of the total numbers of English language publications during both periods. However, The Netherlands and Sweden were more active in relation to their population size.

Comparison of open and endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the perioperative outcome in elective repair of the juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), depending upon whether patients received an open (OAR) or endovascular procedure (EVAR). METHODS: The database stems from the 2013-2017 AAA registry of the German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG), with a total of 1603 juxtarenal AAAs. 786 patients (49.0%) were treated with an endovascular (EVAR) procedure, and 817 (51.0%) with an open (OAR) procedure. RESULTS: Patients receiving EVAR had a median age of 73 years and those receiving OAR a median age of 71 years (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients over 80 years of age was 17.0% for EVAR and 9.9% for OAR (p < 0.001). The proportion of women receiving EVAR (16.9%) was slightly lower than that receiving OAR (18.6%). Aneurysm diameter differed significantly (EVAR mean 57.80 mm, OAR 59.07 mm; p = 0.038). Preoperatively impaired renal function stages 3 to 5 were not significantly different (EVAR 12.5%, OAR 14.4%, p = 0.158). Postoperative complications were significantly less with EVAR (31%) than with OAR at 45.7% (p = 0.001). In regard to MACE (major adverse cardiac events = perioperative death, stroke, or myocardial infarction), there were no significant differences between EVAR (8.8%) and OAR (10.3%) (p = 0.191). Hospital mortality was only in trend lower with EVAR than with OAR (5.7% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p = 0.068). This held true for the hospital mortality in the group above 80 years of age as well. Inpatient stay was 9 (13.3) days for EVAR and 14 (18.8) days for OAR (p < 0.001). The hospital mortality for women receiving EVAR was 10.5%, and significantly higher (p = 0.008) than that for men (4.7%). The same held true for OAR (hospital mortality for women was 11.8%, for men 6.8%; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: In terms of perioperative outcome, the endovascular procedure for treating juxtarenal AAA is more favorable than that documented for OAR. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether EVAR is comparable with OAR in the long term when treating juxtarenal AAA.

Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: This review presents the surgical indications, surgical procedures, and results in the treatment of asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: An updated search of the literature on screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of AAA, based on the German clinical practice guideline published in 2018. RESULTS: Surgery is indicated in men with an asymptomatic AAA ≥ 5.5 cm and in women, ≥ 5.0 cm. The indication in men is based on four randomized trials, while in women the data are not conclusive. The majority of patients with AAA (around 80%) meanwhile receive endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair, EVAR). Open surgery (open aneurysm repair, OAR) is reserved for patients with longer life expectancy and lower morbidity. The pooled 30-day mortality is 1.16% (95% confidence interval [0.92; 1.39]) following EVAR, 3.27% [2.7; 3.83] after OAR. Women have higher operative/interventional mortality than men (odds ratio 1.67%). The mortality for ruptured AAA is extremely high: around 80% of women and 70% of men die after AAA rupture. Ruptured AAA should, if possible, be treated via the endovascular approach, ideally with the patient under local anesthesia. Treatment at specialized centers guarantees the required expertise and infrastructure. Long-term periodic monitoring by mean of imaging (duplex sonography, plus computed tomography if needed) is essential, particularly following EVAR, to detect and (if appropriate) treat endoleaks, to document stable diameter of the eliminated aneurysmal sac, and to determine whether reintervention is necessary (long-term reintervention rate circa 18%). CONCLUSION: Vascular surgery now offers a high degree of safety in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic AAA. Endovascular intervention is preferred.

Surgical leadership within rapidly changing working conditions in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: An overview of the requirements for the head of a surgical department in Germany should be given. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective literature research on surgical professional policy publications of the last 10 years in Germany was conducted. RESULTS: Surveys show that commercial influences on medical decisions in German hospitals have today become an everyday, predominantly negative, actuality. Nevertheless, in one survey, 82.9% of surgical chief physicians reported being very satisfied with their profession, compared with 61.5% of senior physicians and only 43.4% of hospital specialists. Here, the chief physician is challenged. Only 70% of those surveyed stated that they could rely on their direct superiors when difficulties arose at work, and only 34.1% regarded feedback on the quality of their work as sufficient. The high distress rate in surgery (58.2% for all respondents) has led to a lack in desirability and is reflected in a shortage of qualified applicants for resident positions. In various position papers, surgical residents (only 35% describe their working conditions as good) demand improved working conditions. Chief physicians are being asked to facilitate a suitable work-life balance with regular working hours and a corporate culture with participative management and collegial cooperation. Appreciation of employee performance must also be expressed. An essential factor contributing to dissatisfaction is that residents fill a large part of their daily working hours with non-physician tasks. In surveys, 70% of respondents stated that they spend up to ≥3 h a day on documentation and secretarial work. DISCUSSION: The chief physician is expected to relieve his medical staff by employing non-physician assistants to take care of non-physician tasks. Transparent and clearly structured training to achieve specialist status is essential. It has been shown that a balanced work-life balance can be achieved for surgeons. Family and career can be reconciled in appropriately organized departments by making use of part-time and shift models that exclude 24-h shifts and making working hours more flexible.

Gender differences in endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite ongoing research concerning comorbidities and clinical presentation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), the issue of gender associated differences in treatment is far from being settled. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized multicentre study design. All patients suffering from intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb ischaemia (CLI) were included. RESULTS: A total of 2,798 procedures for symptomatic PAD in the infrainguinal region were recorded, with 1,696 (61.4 %) males. Distribution of comorbidities for patients with IC were gender-specifically different. Smoking was more common in men (41.9 vs. 31.9 %, p < .001), men had more often previous coronary heart disease (35.2 vs. 27.7 %, p = .007), and suffered more often from diabetes (33.9 vs. 28.2 %, p = .037). Women were generally older (71 vs. 77 years). Men were more prone to present with IC (46.9 vs. 43.6 %, p < .001) and ulcer/gangrene (43.6 vs. 41.2 %, p < .001). Women were more likely to present with rest pain (9.5 vs. 15.1 %, p < .001). Men were more often treated for a lesion below the knee (BTK) (21.1 vs. 14.9 %, p < .001), and females above the knee (ATK) (58.1 vs. 61.5 %, p < .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association of male gender and treatment for lesions BTK (OR 1.565, 95 % CI 1.281-1.913, p < .001). Dissections and bleeding complications were more often observed in females with IC (3.3 vs. 7.2 %, p = 0.003; 0.4 vs. 1.5 %, p = 0.044). Women were rather discharged to rehabilitation and had a longer hospital stay compared to men (3.4 vs. 8.9 %, p < .001; three vs. four days, p = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an overview on gender-specific differences in endovascular treatment of PAD. To date, available evidence on this topic is limited, emphasising the importance of further vascular research targeting this topic.

Primary colon resection or Hartmann's procedure in malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction? The use of stents as a bridge to surgery.

There is still significant debate regarding the best surgical treatment for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Primary resection and anastomosis offers the advantages of a definite procedure without need for further surgery. Its main disadvantages are related to the increased technical challenge and to the potential higher risk of anastomotic leakage that occurs in the emergency setting. Primary resection with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) is considered the safer option. Tan et al compared in a systematic review and meta-analysis the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery vs emergency surgery in the management of acute malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. The authors concluded that the technical and clinical success rates for stenting were lower than expected. SEMS was associated with a high incidence of clinical and silent perforation. Stenting instead of loop colostomy can be recommended only if the appropriate expertise is available in the hospital. The goal of stenting, a decrease of the stoma rate, may be advocated only if the complication rates of stenting are lower than those of stoma creation in the emergency situation. Until now, this was not demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial.