Health and Health Care of Sexual Minority Individuals in the Rural United States: A Systematic Review.

Lesser health care access and utilization in rural areas are associated with ruralurban health outcome disparities. While some work has examined similar disparities by sexual orientation, little has explicitly explored the combined influences of rural residence and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) status. This study aims to explore literature specific to rural LGB health care access and utilization, identify gaps, and suggest future research. Several databases were searched to identify studies specific to LGB health care access and utilization, and 18 articles were identified and divided into two categories: barriers and facilitators to health care access. Barriers included provider training, discrimination, distance and physical access, and fewer social supports. The data also indicated that sexual orientation disclosure is associated with better health care. Rural sexual minority individuals undergo health care access and utilization inequities, even in excess of their heterosexual rural peers that may be addressed with training and social interventions. Further research is warranted.

Faith leaders' perceptions of needle exchange programs in the rural Illinois Delta Region: Religion as a social determinant of health.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite increasing drug use in rural communities, potentially life-saving harm reduction interventions, such as needle exchange programs (NEPs), remain underutilized. Religion is an integral component of the rural culture that has been shown to influence health, yet no studies to date have explored rural faith leaders' perceptions of harm reduction strategies. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among rural faith leaders (n = 133) in the rural Illinois Delta Region. RESULTS: While most of the respondents felt that drug abuse was an issue in their communities, support was mixed regarding whether they were in favor of NEPs with the majority of respondents having never heard of an NEP before this survey. While the majority believed that NEPs would help decrease bloodborne disease transmission, it was also perceived that NEPs would increase drug use. Significant differences in perceptions based on race, marital status, and political party also exist. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Congruent with previous harm reduction literature, many rural faith leaders have varied perceptions of NEPs. Rural faith leaders could benefit from education about NEPs, including the possible positive and negative impacts they can have on the community. Future studies should explore contextual differences among rural faith leaders. To date, no studies have examined faith-based organizations' perceptions of NEPs. The findings have the potential to increase the current body of knowledge and provide data to support recommendations for engaging faith-based organizations in behavioral health service delivery.