NECTIN4 Amplification Is Frequent in Solid Tumors and Predicts Enfortumab Vedotin Response in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

PURPOSE: The anti-NECTIN4 antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). However, durable benefit is only achieved in a small, yet uncharacterized patient subset. NECTIN4 is located on chromosome 1q23.3, and 1q23.3 gains represent frequent copy number variations (CNVs) in urothelial cancer. Here, we aimed to evaluate NECTIN4 amplifications as a genomic biomarker to predict EV response in patients with mUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We established a NECTIN4-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to assess the predictive value of NECTIN4 CNVs in a multicenter EV-treated mUC patient cohort (mUC-EV, n = 108). CNVs were correlated with membranous NECTIN4 protein expression, EV treatment responses, and outcomes. We also assessed the prognostic value of NECTIN4 CNVs measured in metastatic biopsies of non-EV-treated mUC (mUC-non-EV, n = 103). Furthermore, we queried The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets (10,712 patients across 32 cancer types) for NECTIN4 CNVs. RESULTS: NECTIN4 amplifications are frequent genomic events in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TCGA bladder cancer data set: approximately 17%) and mUC (approximately 26% in our mUC cohorts). In mUC-EV, NECTIN4 amplification represents a stable genomic alteration during metastatic progression and associates with enhanced membranous NECTIN4 protein expression. Ninety-six percent (27 of 28) of patients with NECTIN4 amplifications demonstrated objective responses to EV compared with 32% (24 of 74) in the nonamplified subgroup (P < .001). In multivariable Cox analysis adjusted for age, sex, and Bellmunt risk factors, NECTIN4 amplifications led to a 92% risk reduction for death (hazard ratio, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34]; P < .001). In the mUC-non-EV, NECTIN4 amplifications were not associated with outcomes. TCGA Pan-Cancer analysis demonstrated that NECTIN4 amplifications occur frequently in other cancers, for example, in 5%-10% of breast and lung cancers. CONCLUSION: NECTIN4 amplifications are genomic predictors of EV responses and long-term survival in patients with mUC.

[Neutropenia - when is GCSF support indicated?] / Neutropenie ­ wann ist eine GCSF Unterstützung notwendig?

Many systemic treatments used in genitourinary oncology negatively affect haematopoiesis, thus leading to neutropenia. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to bacterial, and other infections. Often fever is the only symptom in these patients. Neutropenic fever is a major threat for these patients, as it may lead to life-threatening therapy complications that significantly impair the patient's quality of life, Moreover, it may also worsen the prognosis due to therapy delays or necessary dose modifications. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF), which can improve neutrophil granulocyte formation, are used both for supportive treatment in febrile neutropenia and for its prophylaxis. The correct indication for such GCSF support depends on the general risk of febrile neutropenia of the therapy used, as well as on individual patient factors and the treatment intent (palliative vs. curative). Based on the current recommendations both of the German and international guidelines, this article aims to provide an up-to-date and practice-oriented overview of the use of GCSF in uro-oncology.

[Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma - Current status and what comes after checkpoint inhibitors?] / Systemtherapie beim metastasierten Urothelkarzinom − Aktueller Stand und was kommt nach den Checkpointinhibitoren?

The increasing knowledge of the influence of the immune system on tumour development and progression has fundamentally changed our understanding of tumour biology in recent years. While the available treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder have hardly improved over decades, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has caused major changes in the corresponding treatment landscape.Although cisplatin-based combination therapies remain the main element, additional effective treatment options now exist with the PD-(L)-1 inhibitors atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, which have been approved in Europe. A remarkable long-term response is balanced by the occurrence of occasionally severe immune-mediated side effects and an overall low response rate of approximately 25 %. A large number of current clinical trials therefore address possible combinatory approaches in order to make optimal use of possible synergisms and additive effects of the substances available to date, taking into account an acceptable side effect profile. In addition, many new therapeutic approaches are also being tested in clinical trials. In this context, developments in the field of antibody-drug conjugates and FGFR inhibitors with regards to the very recent FDA approvals are particularly noteworthy.The present review provides an overview of currently available treatment options in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and especially focuses on future therapeutic approaches based on current clinical trials.

[Personalised medicine in urothelial bladder cancer]. / Personalisierte Medizin im Urothelkarzinom der Harnblase.

Available treatment options and outcomes for patients suffering from urothelial bladder cancer, especially in the metastatic stage, have hardly improved over decades. However, the increasing use of high-throughput analyses and the concept of immune surveillance against tumours have recently changed our understanding of tumour biology in terms of tumour development and progression. Our knowledge of genetic mutations and molecular subtypes provides the possibility of tailor-made therapeutic approaches for patients suffering from bladder cancer. For example, changes in DNA repair signalling pathways are possible predictors of chemotherapy response, and targeted therapies using FGFR or PARP inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials. The extent to which molecular subtypes will find their way into clinical practice depends on the prospective evaluation of their prognostic and predictive value. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors is probably the most significant expansion of available treatment options in bladder cancer. Despite their promising results, however, a lot of questions remain to be answered, as only 25 % of patients respond. Again, this highlights the need for predictive biomarkers. The large inter- and intratumoural heterogeneity represents a particular challenge for the clinical implementation of personalised treatment options in bladder cancer. All in all, some important steps towards personalised medicine in urothelial bladder cancer have been taken in the past few years, but, for the most part, their prospective evaluation is still pending.