Motor vehicle crashes: the association of alcohol consumption with the type and severity of injuries and outcomes.

The effect of alcohol ingestion on short-term outcomes for trauma patients is indeterminate. Experimental and clinical reports often conflict. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of positive alcohol screens, the effect of alcohol ingestion on injury patterns, severity, and outcomes in patients who were involved in motor vehicle crashes (MVC). MVC patients aged > 10 years treated in any of the 13 trauma centers in Los Angeles County during the calendar year 2003 were studied. All patients underwent routine alcohol screening on admission. The alcohol negative group ("no ETOH") had a blood alcohol level (BAL) of < or = 0.005 g/dL. Low and high alcohol groups ("low ETOH" and "high ETOH") had a BAL of > 0.005 g/dL to < 0.08 g/dL and > or = 0.08 g/dL, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to compare injury severity, complications, survival, and length of hospital stay among the three groups. Of the 3025 patients studied, 2013 (67%) were in the no ETOH group, 216 (7%) were in the low ETOH group, and 796 (26%) were in the high ETOH group. Levels were not associated with injury severity, Emergency Department hypotension, or Intensive Care Unit length of stay. Patients with an injury severity score > 15 and a high BAL had a higher incidence of severe head trauma (head abbreviated injury score > 3) and increased incidence of sepsis. However, in this group of severely injured, the high ETOH group had a significantly better survival rate than patients in the no ETOH group (adjusted odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.94, p = 0.05). Severely injured MVC victims with a high BAL have a higher incidence of severe head trauma and septic complications than no ETOH patients. However, the high ETOH group had superior adjusted survival rates.

Pedestrian injuries: the association of alcohol consumption with the type and severity of injuries and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Literature on the effect of alcohol ingestion on short-term outcomes for trauma patients shows conflicting results. We performed this study to investigate the prevalence of positive alcohol screens and the effect of alcohol level on injury patterns, injury severity, and outcomes in pedestrians and bicyclists involved in a collision with an automobile. STUDY DESIGN: The study population included all pedestrians and bicyclists older than 10 years, treated in any of the 13 trauma centers in the Los Angeles County Emergency Services System during the calendar year 2003, who were involved in a collision with an automobile and had a blood alcohol level measured. The alcohol negative group was defined as those patients with a blood alcohol level 0.05 g/dL to<0.08 g/dL and>/=0.08 g/dL, respectively. We compared the three study groups with respect to demographics, injury patterns, injury severity, complications, and outcomes. Logistic regression was used to determine if alcohol had an independent association with any outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1,042 patients who met study criteria. Overall, 606 patients (58%) had a negative alcohol screen, 84 (8%) had low alcohol levels, and 352 (34%) had high alcohol levels. Alcohol level was not notably associated with severity of injury, admission hypotension, ICU length of stay, major complications, and injury pattern (head, chest, abdomen, or extremity Area Injury Score). Mortality was similar in the three alcohol level groups, but the overall complication rate and hospital length of stay were markedly higher in the high alcohol level group than they were in the negative alcohol level group. CONCLUSIONS: In pedestrians and bicyclists involved in a collision with an automobile, a high alcohol level is not associated with body area severity of injury, overall severity of injury, and hospital mortality. But high alcohol level is notably associated with higher overall complication rate and longer hospital length of stay.

Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?

BACKGROUND: Trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, described more than 20 years ago, is still widely taught in the design of trauma systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of this trimodal distribution in a modern trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: A study of trauma registry and emergency medical services records of trauma deaths in the County of Los Angeles was conducted over a 3-year period. The times from injury to death were analyzed according to mechanism of injury and body area (head, chest, abdomen, extremities) with severe trauma (abbreviated injury score [AIS] >/= 4). RESULTS: During the study period there were 4,151 trauma deaths. Penetrating trauma accounted for 50.0% of these deaths. The most commonly injured body area with critical trauma (AIS >/= 4) was the head (32.0%), followed by chest (20.8%), abdomen (11.5%), and extremities (1.8%). Time from injury to death was available in 2,944 of these trauma deaths. Overall, there were two distinct peaks of deaths: the first peak (50.2% of deaths) occurred within the first hour of injury. The second peak occurred 1 to 6 hours after admission (18.3% of deaths). Only 7.6% of deaths were late (>1 week), during the third peak of the classic trimodal distribution. Temporal distribution of deaths in penetrating trauma was very different from blunt trauma and did not follow the classic trimodal distribution. Other significant independent factors associated with time of death were chest AIS and head AIS. Temporal distribution of deaths as a result of severe head trauma did not follow any pattern and did not resemble classic trimodal distribution at all. CONCLUSIONS: The classic "trimodal" distribution of deaths does not apply in our trauma system. Temporal distribution of deaths is influenced by the mechanism of injury, age of the patient, and body area with severe trauma. Knowledge of the time of distribution of deaths might help in allocating trauma resources and focusing research effort.