Association of oral endothelin receptor antagonists with risks of cardiovascular events and mortality: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are widely used in a variety of disorders, including pulmonary artery hypertension, systemic sclerosis, diabetic and kidney diseases, and several tumors. However, reported adverse events, especially increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality, have cast doubt on their potential clinical application. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to confirm whether ERAs increased CVD risk and mortality. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed (1966-2015), EMBASE (1974-2015), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register Database for randomized controlled trials published between Jan 1, 1990 and Mar 18, 2015. Inclusion criteria included a study duration of more than 3 weeks, the use of a randomized control group receiving an oral ERA or placebo, and the availability of outcome data for cardiovascular events and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 33 trials met the inclusion criteria. There were 8098 cases in the ERA group and 5074 cases in the placebo group. Compared with the control group, the risk ratio (RR) for all-cause death in the ERA group was 0.983 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.883 to 1.094, P = 0.754]. The summary RR for cardiovascular events was 1.651 in the ERA group (95% CI, 1.164 to 2.34, P = 0.005). The pooled results showed that ERAs treatment could lead to more edema, anemia, and abnormal transaminase levels. Also, there was an increased proportion of discontinued therapy in the ERA treatment because of side effects (RR = 1.322, 95% CI, 1.036 to 1.686, P = 0.025). There were no significant differences in the experienced episodes of headache and dyspnea between the active therapy and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERAs therapy is not significantly associated with increased all-cause death, but there are more cardiovascular events and edema or fluid retention, anemia, and liver enzymes disorder. Large clinical randomized controlled studies are needed to further confirm the safety of the clinical application of ERAs.

Low-dose aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients on hemodialysis: A 5-y prospective cohort study.

Introduction Aspirin is an effective antiplatelet drug for preventing cardiovascular events in high-risk subjects. However, for patients with chronic kidney disease and undergoing hemodialysis (HD), its preventive efficacy remains controversial. The present study aimed to determine whether aspirin therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in patients on HD. Methods We conducted a 5-y prospective cohort study involving patients on HD. Major exposure variables included prescription of aspirin (100 mg/d) and no aspirin (nonaspirin). The primary outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular events, hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcome included bleeding events defined by the requirement of hospitalization. Findings In this study, 406 patients on regular HD were involved during a 5-y follow-up. Among these, 152 and 254 propensity-matched patients were enrolled in the aspirin and nonaspirin cohort, respectively. The cumulative survival rate was not significantly higher in the aspirin than in the nonaspirin users (log rank χ2 = 1.080, P = 0.299). Aspirin use was not significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal congestive heart failure, as well as acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. The risk of fatal cerebral hemorrhage was not significantly increased in the aspirin users (HR = 1.795, 95% CI 0.666-4.841, P = 0.174). After adjustment for other confounders, aspirin use was also not associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality and CVD. Discussion The present prospective cohort study suggests that low-dose aspirin use is not associated with a significant decrease in the risks of all-cause mortality, CVD, and stroke in population undergoing HD (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02261025).

Antioxidant N-acetylcysteine protects pancreatic ß-cells against aldosterone-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in female db/db mice and insulin-producing MIN6 cells.

Previous studies have shown that primary aldosteronism is associated with glucose-related metabolic disorders. However, the mechanisms by which aldosterone (ALDO) triggers ß-cell dysfunction remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether oxidative stress is involved in and whether the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone (SPL) could prevent or delay ß-cell damage in vivo and in vitro. As expected, 8 weeks after ALDO treatment, 12-week-old female diabetic db/db mice exhibited impaired oral glucose tolerance, decreased ß-cell mass, and heightened levels of oxidative stress marker (urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine). NAC reversed these symptoms completely, whereas SPL treatment did so only partially. After exposure to ALDO, the mouse pancreatic ß-cell line MIN6 exhibited decreased viability and increased caspase-3 activity, as well as reduced expression of Bcl-2/Bax and p-AKT, even if mineralocorticoid receptor was completely suppressed with small interfering RNA. NAC, but not SPL, suppressed oxidative stress in MIN6 cells, as revealed by the decrease in inducible NOS levels and expression of the proteins p22-phox and p67-phox. These findings suggest that oxidative stress may be involved in ALDO-induced ß-cell dysfunction and that NAC, but not SPL, may protect pancreatic ß-cells of mice from ALDO-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in a manner independent of its receptor.

Erythropoietin improves insulin resistance via the regulation of its receptor-mediated signaling pathways in 3T3L1 adipocytes.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) reduces serum insulin levels, increases insulin sensitivity, and reduces insulin resistance (IR). However, the mechanisms behind these effects are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism by which rHuEPO effects IR in 3T3L1 adipocytes. After treatment with different concentrations of rHuEPO, glucose consumption, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), adiponectin, and leptin levels were assayed with a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Endogenous erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) expression was inhibited using small interfering RNA (siRNA). EPOR protein and mRNA expression was detected via immunofluorescence and real-time PCR analyses, respectively. The expression of pAKT/AKT and p-STAT5/STAT5 was determined via Western blot analysis. rHuEPO treatment improved glucose uptake, increased adiponectin levels, and reduced TNF-α and leptin levels in 3T3L1 adipocytes with dexamethasone-induced IR. Whereas EPOR protein and gene expression was absent in preadipocytes, it was observed in mature 3T3L1 adipocytes. However, the expression of EPOR in insulin resistant 3T3L1 adipocytes was significantly decreased (p<0.05). rHuEPO increased the expression of EPOR, and upregulated the expression of pAKT/AKT and pSTAT5/STAT5 in 3T3L1 adipocytes (p<0.05), which was blocked by siEPOR, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002, and a STAT5 inhibitor, respectively. In summary, rHuEPO reduced IR in adipocytes by increasing glucose uptake and improving the adipokine profile. rHuEPO-induced EPOR protein expression and subsequent induction of pAKT and pSTAT5 suggest that the EPO-EPOR system may play a role in glucose metabolism within adipocytes.