Insights into the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of quetiapine: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Quetiapine exhibits notable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) variability, the origins of which are poorly understood. This systematic review summarizes published population PK/PD studies and identifies significant covariates accounting for this variability to inform precision dosing. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases and compared study characteristics, model parameters, and covariate effects. Visual predictive distributions were used to compare different models. Forest plots and Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the influence of covariates. RESULTS: Six population PK and three population PK/PD studies were included. The median apparent clearance in adults was 87.7 L/h. Strong and moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers increased the apparent clearance approximately fourfold, while strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors reduced it by 93%. The half-maximum effect concentrations were 82.8 ng/mL for the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and 583 ng/mL for dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. Both treatment duration and quetiapine exposure were associated with weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent administration of potent or moderate CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors need to be avoided in quetiapine-treated patients. When co-medication is required, it is recommended to adjust the dosage based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Additional research is warranted to delineate the dose-exposure-response relationships of quetiapine and active metabolite norquetiapine in pediatrics, geriatrics, hepatically-impaired patients, and women using contraceptives or are pregnant or menopausal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023446654.

How to handle a delayed or missed dose of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation? A model-informed remedial strategy.

AIMS: Edoxaban is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) widely used for the long-term prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Adherence to NOAC therapy has been unsatisfactory and decreases over time. Remedial strategies are currently used to address the non-adherence events. Current recommendations, however, are generic and not well supported by evidence. The aim of this study was to explore appropriate remedial dosing regimens for non-adherent edoxaban-treated NVAF patients through Monte Carlo simulation. METHODS: Six regimens were compared with the current recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guide based on total deviation time. Both edoxaban plasma concentration and intrinsic Factor Xa activity were considered. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using RxODE based on a published population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. RESULTS: The proposed remedial strategies were different than the EHRA recommendations and were related to the delay time. However, it was found that the missed dose can be administered immediately if the delay time is within 11 h. When the delay is between 12 and 19 h, a half dose followed by a regular dosing schedule is recommended. When the delay time exceeds 19 h, a full dose followed by a half dose is preferred. CONCLUSION: PK/PD modelling and simulation are effective in developing and evaluating the remedial strategies of edoxaban, which can help maximise its therapeutic effect.

How to Handle Delayed or Missed Doses: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective.

Delayed or missed doses are unavoidable in clinical practice and remain as a challenge that threatens a patient's health and quality-of-life, especially in the pharmacotherapy of chronic disease treatment. Unfortunately, information or guidance concerning the management of delayed or missed doses is scarce, precluding clinicians or clinical pharmacologists from instructing patients in a precision dosing manner. It is therefore urgent to develop remedial strategies to inform patients of alternative dosing regimens in compensation for the loss of efficacy due to delayed or missed doses and minimize unintended clinical consequences. Studies aiming to establish remedial regimens have been conducted since the 1980s for oral contraceptives and antihypertensive agents, using the controlled substitution of placebos for active medications. However, it appeared to be unethical in many areas of pharmacotherapy due to deliberately discontinuing or restarting the medication. Alternatively, pharmacometric modeling and simulation offers an opportunity to investigate the effect of various non-adherence scenarios on pharmacokinetic profiles and establish the optimum remedial dosing regimen in a time-effective and systematical way. This review provides a general overview of procedures and strategies on how to develop remedial dosing regimens based on pharmacometric approaches through the scrutiny of case examples in the literature.