Sensory Nerve Regulation via H3K27 Demethylation Revealed in Akermanite Composite Microspheres Repairing Maxillofacial Bone Defect.

Maxillofacial bone defects exhibit intricate anatomy and irregular morphology, presenting challenges for effective treatment. This study aimed to address these challenges by developing an injectable bioactive composite microsphere, termed D-P-Ak (polydopamine-PLGA-akermanite), designed to fit within the defect site while minimizing injury. The D-P-Ak microspheres biodegraded gradually, releasing calcium, magnesium, and silicon ions, which, notably, not only directly stimulated the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) but also activated sensory nerve cells to secrete calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a key factor in bone repair. Moreover, the released CGRP enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through epigenetic methylation modification. Specifically, inhibition of EZH2 and enhancement of KDM6A reduced the trimethylation level of histone 3 at lysine 27 (H3K27), thereby activating the transcription of osteogenic genes such as Runx2 and Osx. The efficacy of the bioactive microspheres in bone repair is validated in a rat mandibular defect model, demonstrating that peripheral nerve response facilitates bone regeneration through epigenetic modification. These findings illuminated a novel strategy for constructing neuroactive osteo-inductive biomaterials with potential for further clinical applications.

Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the dentoskeletal effects of Vanbeek Activator, Herbst, Twin-Block and Mandibular Advancement with clear aligners in children with skeletal Class II malocclusions. METHODS: A sample with sixty-three patients (37 males, 26 females) was included and divided into untreated control group (C, n = 12), Vanbeek Activator group (V, n = 14), Herbst group (H, n = 11), Twin-Block group (TB, n = 12) and MA group (MA, n = 14). Cephalometric analysis and Johnston Pitchfork analysis were performed to quantify the skeletal and dentoalveolar components in molar relationship and overjet correction. Compare the differences of cephalometric data and Johnston-analysis data. RESULTS: The treatment changes showed significant differences in SNB, FH-NP, NA-PA, Co-Go, Co-Pog, ANB, lower facial height ratio, U1-PP, U6-PP, L1-MP and U1-L1. All the appliances improved overjet relationships significantly (Vanbeek, Herbst, Twin-Block and MA were 2.77 mm, 5.53 mm, 4.73 mm and 3.66 mm respectively) with significant retraction of maxillary incisors. The lower incisor displacement of group V and MA was negative, while that of group H and TB was positive and there were significant differences. Molar relationships were also improved by 3.45 mm, 6.85 mm, 3.48 mm and 0.92 mm for Vanbeek, Herbst, Twin-Block and MA. Mandible displacement showed a trend of group H > TB > V > MA. The displacement of maxillary molars in group H was greater than that in group C, TB and MA, and that of mandibular ones was greater than that in group C, V and MA, significantly. Herbst, Twin-Block and MA have more significant dentoalveolar effect than Vanbeek, while Vanbeek has more skeletal effect than the others especially in restraining maxillary growth. CONCLUSIONS: Four appliances are all effective in mandibular advancement, modification of class II molar relationship and deep overjet, with unavoidable increase in lower facial ratio. Vanbeek Activator has the most skeletal effects. Vanbeek and MA have a good control of mandibular incisors while more compensatory lower incisors proclination in Herbst and Twin-Block. Herbst has greater maxillary molar distalization. MA allows aligning and leveling meanwhile leading the mandible forward.

In situ construction of flower-like nanostructured calcium silicate bioceramics for enhancing bone regeneration mediated via FAK/p38 signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: The repair of tissue defects has attracted considerable attention and remained a substantial challenge. Calcium silicate (CaSiO3, CS) bioceramics have attracted the interest of researchers due to their excellent biodegradability. Recent studies have demonstrated that nanoscale-modified bioactive materials with favorable biodegradability could promote bone tissue regeneration, providing an alternative approach for the repair of bone defects. However, the direct construction of biodegradable nanostructures in situ on CS bioceramics was still difficult. RESULTS: In this study, flower-like nanostructures were flexibly prepared in situ on biodegradable CS bioceramics via hydrothermal treatment. The flower-like nanostructure surfaces exhibited better hydrophilicity and more significantly stimulated cell adhesion, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and osteogenic differentiation. Furthermore, the CS bioceramics with flower-like nanostructures effectively promoted bone regeneration and were gradually replaced with newly formed bone due to the favorable biodegradability of these CS bioceramics. Importantly, we revealed an osteogenesis-related mechanism by which the FAK/p38 signaling pathway could be involved in the regulation of bone mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) osteogenesis by the flower-like nanostructure surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Flower-like nanostructure surfaces on CS bioceramics exerted a strong effect on promoting bone repair and regeneration, suggesting their excellent potential as bone implant candidates for improving bone regeneration.