Endoscopic diagnosis of invasion depth for early colorectal carcinomas: a prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, acetic acid, and crystal violet.

Several studies have validated the effectiveness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in estimating invasion depth of early colorectal cancers. However, comparative diagnostic accuracy between NBI and chromoendoscopy remains unclear. Other than crystal violet, use of acetic acid as a new staining method to diagnose deep submucosal invasive (SM-d) carcinomas has not been extensively evaluated. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of NBI, acetic acid enhancement, and crystal violet staining in predicting invasion depth of early colorectal cancers. A total of 112 early colorectal cancers were prospectively observed by NBI, acetic acid, and crystal violet staining in sequence by 1 expert colonoscopist. All endoscopic images of each technique were stored and reassessed. Finally, 294 images of 98 lesions were selected for evaluation by 3 less experienced endoscopists. The accuracy of NBI, acetic acid, and crystal violet for real-time diagnosis was 85.7%, 86.6%, and 92.9%, respectively. For image evaluation by novices, NBI achieved the highest accuracy of 80.6%, compared with that of 72.4% by acetic acid, and 75.8% by crystal violet. The kappa values of NBI, acetic acid, and crystal violet among the 3 trainees were 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.83), 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61-0.79), respectively. For diagnosis of SM-d carcinoma, NBI was slightly inferior to crystal violet staining, when performed by the expert endoscopist. However, NBI yielded higher accuracy than crystal violet staining, in terms of less experienced endoscopists. Acetic acid enhancement with pit pattern analysis was capable of predicting SM-d carcinoma, comparable to the traditional crystal violet staining.

New dual therapy for primary treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective randomized study in Shanghai, China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the eradication rates, side effects and the patient compliance of a dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin as the first-line therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. METHODS: A total of 120 patients diagnosed endoscopically with non-ulcer dyspepsia with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned into two groups, one treated with amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily plus rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily (R10A group) or 20 mg twice daily (R20A group) for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was evaluated by (13) C-urea breath test (UBT) at 4-6 weeks after the completion of treatment. H. pylori eradication rate was analyzed by per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses together with 95% confidence interval (CI). Side effects and patients' compliance were also recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients (58 in the R10A group and 59 in the R20A group) completed the study, among whom five did not undertake the UBT. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 89.8% of patients in the R20A group by ITT analysis and 93.0% by PP analysis, which was significantly higher than those in the R10A group (75.9% and 80.0%, respectively, P < 0.05). Side effects, including skin rash, abdominal discomfort, headache, insomnia and nausea, were all mild and were treated symptomatically without the need to discontinue the treatment. CONCLUSION: The modified dual therapy with high doses of rabeprazole and amoxicillin is considered an effective and safe primary therapy for H. pylori eradication and could be recommended as the first-line eradication regimen for certain patients.

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The eradication rates of first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients after an unsuccessful 10-day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14-day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n=70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n=68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by (13) C-urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per-protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p<0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen-day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton-pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.