Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: report of 549 cases.

PURPOSE: To analyze the significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival with and without the addition of prophylactic postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after radical resection of thoracic esophageal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 549 thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer patients who had undergone radical resection were randomized by the envelope method into a surgery-alone group (S, n = 275) and a surgery plus RT group (S+R, n = 274). We performed a retrospective review of all patients according to the extent of metastasis. The patients were classified into three groups: Group 1, 269 patients (49.0%) without lymph node involvement; Group 2, 159 patients (29.0%) with one to two positive nodes; and Group 3, 121 patients (22.0%) with three or more positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: For the same T stage (T3), the 5-year survival rate for Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 50.6%, 29.3%, and 11.7%, respectively (p = 0.0000). For patients with Stage III, the 5-year survival rate for Groups 1 (T4N0M0), 2 (T3-T4N1M0), and 3 (T3-T4N2M0) was 58.1%, 30.6%, and 14.4%, respectively (p = 0.0092). The 5-year survival rate of the S and S+R groups with positive lymph nodes (Groups 2 and 3) was 17.6% and 34.1% (p = 0.0378). In the positive lymph node groups, the incidence of failure by intrathoracic lymph node metastasis and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in the S+R group (21.5% and 4.6%, respectively) was lower than in the S group (35.9% and 19.7%, respectively; p <0.012). In the negative lymph node group, the incidence of failure by intrathoracic lymph node metastasis in the S and S+R groups was 27.8% and 13.3%, respectively (p = 0.006). Hematogenous metastasis was the greatest (27.5%) in Group 3 (three or more positive lymph nodes). CONCLUSION: The number of metastatic lymph nodes is one of the important factors affecting the survival of patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. In our study, postoperative RT improved the survival of patients with positive lymph nodes. Additionally, postoperative RT reduced the incidence of intrathoracic recurrence and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis for all patients.

[Relation between pathologic tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy and the prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relation between pathologic tumor response in preoperative radiotherapy and long-term survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma and the significance of radiosensitivity in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: 176 esophageal cancer patients received preoperative radiotherapy and tumor resection from 1977 to 1989. The radio-response was classified into severe, moderate and mild according to the tumor pathologic response to radiotherapy. 191 patients treated by surgery alone served as control. The relation between radiation response of tumor and long-term survival and disease free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates of severe, moderate, mild and control groups were 60.7%, 46.4%, 21.1% and 38.8%. The survival was significantly improved in severe than moderate one (P = 0.029), moderate than mild group (P = 0.013) and severe than the control group (P = 0.000). It was only slightly improved in the moderate than control group (P = 0.295), but decreased in mild than the control group (P = 0.034). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 55.7%, 40.7%, 18.7% and 33.3% in severe, moderate, mild and control groups. The DFS was significantly improved in severe than moderate group (P = 0.029), moderate than mild group (P = 0.018), severe than the control group (P = 0.000 4). It was only slightly improved in moderate than the control group (P = 0.23), but decreased in the mild than the control group (P = 0.096). In the severe group, the proportion of stage T4, N1 lesion, TNM stage I-II and number of radical resection were 9.8%, 18%, 90.2%, and 90.2%. In the moderate group, they were 20.3%, 15.9%, 79.7% and 82.6%. In the mild group, they were 42.2%, 37.8%, 53.3% and 46.7%. In the control group, they were 50.3%, 40.8%, 37.7% and 77.5%. The rates of downstaging and surgical resection were improved only in severe and moderate groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The fact that only patients in whom severe radiation response are observed would appreciably benefit from preoperative radiotherapy whereas the others do not, illustrates that there might be no benefit of radiotherapy for radioresistant esophageal carcinoma. Radiosensitivity measurement before preoperative radiotherapy would be valuable for individualized treatment.

Value of radiotherapy after radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma: a report of 495 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite three decades of debate, no conclusion has been reached concerning the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy for resected esophageal carcinoma. From 1986 through 1997, a prospective randomized study was carried out with 495 patients in an attempt to define the value of this therapeutic modality. METHODS: A total of 495 patients with esophageal cancer who had undergone radical resection were randomized by the envelope method into a surgery-alone group (S) of 275 patients and a surgery plus radiotherapy group (S + R) of 220 patients. Radiation treatment was started 3 to 4 weeks after the operation. The portals encompassed the entire mediastinum and bilateral supraclavicular areas. A midplane dose of 50 to 60 Gy in 25 to 30 fractions was delivered over 5 to 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 31.7% for the S group and 41.3% (p = 0.4474) for the S + R group. The 5-year survival rates of patients who were lymph node positive were 14.7% and 29.2% (p = 0.0698), respectively. Five-year survival rates of stage III patients were 13.1% and 35.1% (p = 0.0027), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative prophylactic radiotherapy improved the 5-year survival rate in esophageal cancer patients with positive lymph node metastases and in patients with stage III disease compared with similar patients who did not receive radiation therapy. These results were almost significant for patients with positive lymph node metastases and highly significant for patients with stage III disease.