Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 16(9): 1228-33, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22748131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment outcome of the first Green Light Committee (GLC) approved countrywide management of multidrug-resistant (MDR-) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in Estonia and to evaluate risk factors contributing to TB recurrence over 8 years of follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of MDR- and XDR-TB patients starting second-line anti-tuberculosis drug treatment between 1 August 2001 and 31 July 2003, with follow-up until 31 December 2010. RESULTS: In 211 MDR- and XDR-TB patients, treatment success was 61.1%; 22.3% defaulted, 8.5% failed and 8.1% died. TB recurrence among successfully treated patients was 8.5%, with no significant difference between XDR-TB and MDR-TB. TB recurrence was associated with resistance to all injectables (HR 2.27, 95%CI 1.16-5.06, P = 0.046), resistance to a greater number of drugs (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.11-1.64, P = 0.003), and sputum smear positivity (HR 2.16, 95%CI 1.16-4.00, P = 0.016). A history of previous TB treatment was associated with TB recurrence among successfully treated patients (HR 4.28, 95%CI 1.13-16.15, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The internationally recommended Category IV treatment regimens are sufficiently effective to cure 75% of adherent MDR- and XDR-TB patients. A history of previous treatment, resistance to all injectable agents and resistance to a greater number of drugs increase the recurrence of MDR- and XDR-TB.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Estonia/epidemiology , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/microbiology , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Medication Adherence , Multivariate Analysis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sputum/microbiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/mortality
2.
BMJ ; 318(7179): 285-8, 1999 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9924052

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year. DESIGN: Placebo controlled, double blind trial. SETTING: Reykjavik health centre. SUBJECTS: 237 smokers aged 22-66 years living in or around Reykjavik. INTERVENTIONS: Nicotine patch for 5 months with nicotine nasal spray for 1 year (n=118) or nicotine patch with placebo spray (n=119). Treatment with patches included 15 mg of nicotine for 3 months, 10 mg for the fourth month, and 5 mg for the fifth month, whereas nicotine in the nasal spray was available for up to 1 year. Both groups received supportive treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sustained abstinence from smoking. RESULTS: Sustained abstinence rates for the patch and nasal spray group and patch only group were 51% v 35% after 6 weeks (odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.17% to 3.32; P=0.011(chi2), 37% v 25% after 3 months (1.76, 1.01 to 3.08; P=0.045), 31% v 16% after 6 months (2.40, 1.27 to 4.50; P=0.005), 27% v 11% after 12 months (3.03, 1.50 to 6.14; P=0.001), and 16% v 9% after 6 years (2.09, 0.93 to 4.72; P=0.08) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Short and long term abstinence rates show that the combination of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year is a more effective method of stopping smoking than using a patch only. The low percentage of participants using the nasal spray at 1 year, and the few relapses during the second year, suggest that it is not cost effective to use a nasal spray for longer than 7 months after stopping a patch.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/administration & dosage , Nicotinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
3.
Addiction ; 94(7): 1007-15, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10707439

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is an established aid in stopping smoking, while the role of antidepressants remains uncertain. Antidepressants added to NRT might improve abstinence rates. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of nicotine inhaler and fluoxetine vs. nicotine inhaler and placebo in attempts to quit smoking. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: A smoker's cessation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred volunteers smoking 10 cigarettes/day or more. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were instructed to start taking a daily dose of 10 mg of fluoxetine or placebo 16 days before stopping smoking, then 20 mg 10 days before quitting, continuing for up to at least 3 months. Subjects were instructed to use 6-12 units per day of nicotine inhalers after stopping smoking for up to 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Continuous abstinence rates recorded at various time points up to 12 months from the quit date. FINDINGS: The sustained abstinence rate for the inhaler-fluoxetine group was 54%, 40%, 29% and 21% after 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, compared to 48%, 40%, 32% and 23% for the inhaler-placebo group. The differences were not significant at any time point. Abstinence up to 3 months was more likely in older smokers, those with a lower Beck Depression Inventory Score (BDI), lower Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score and no history of alcoholism. Fluoxetine appeared to increase abstinence rates among high BDI smokers compared to high BDI smokers assigned placebo. Serum levels of nicotine during treatment in the inhaler-fluoxetine group were lower than in the inhaler-placebo group so that fluoxetine may have reduced inhaler use through a common site of action. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that fluoxetine treatment when used as an adjunct to NRT in unselected smokers is effective, but there may be an advantage to using it in depressed smokers.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/administration & dosage , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Nicotinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/blood , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluoxetine/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nicotine/blood , Nicotinic Agonists/blood , Respiratory Therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...