Assessment of Pleural Effusion and Small Pleural Drain Insertion by Resident Doctors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study.

Small-bore pleural drainage device insertion has become a first-line therapy for the treatment of pleural effusions (PLEFF) in the intensive care unit; however, no data are available regarding the performance of resident doctors in the execution of this procedure. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of complications related to ultrasound-guided percutaneous small-bore pleural drain insertion by resident doctors. In this single-center observational study, the primary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Secondary outcomes studied were as follows: estimation of PLEFF size by ultrasound and postprocedure changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In all, 87 pleural drains were inserted in 88 attempts. Of these, 16 were positioned by the senior intensivist following a failed attempt by the resident, giving a total of 71 successful placements performed by residents. In 13 cases (14.8%), difficulties were encountered in advancing the catheter over the guidewire. In 16 cases (18.4%), the drain was positioned by a senior intensivist after a failed attempt by a resident. In 8 cases (9.2%), the final chest X-ray revealed a kink in the catheter. A pneumothorax was identified in 21.8% of cases with a mean size (±SD) of just 10 mm (±6; maximum size: 20 mm). The mean size of PLEFF was 57.4 mm (±19.9), corresponding to 1148 mL (±430) according to Balik's formula. Ultrasound-guided placement of a small-bore pleural drain by resident doctors is a safe procedure, although it is associated with a rather high incidence of irrelevant pneumothoraces.

Utility of pleural effusion drainage in the ICU: An updated systematic review and META-analysis.

PURPOSE: The effects on the respiratory or hemodynamic function of drainage of pleural effusion on critically ill patients are not completely understood. First outcome was to evaluate the PiO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio before and after pleural drainage. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: evaluation of A-a gradient, End-Expiratory lung volume (EELV), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (mAP), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), ejection fraction (EF), and E/A waves ratio (E/A). A tertiary outcome: evaluation of pneumothorax and hemothorax complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches were performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases from inception to June 2018 (PROSPERO CRD42018105794). RESULTS: We included 31 studies (2265 patients). Pleural drainage improved the P/F ratio (SMD: -0.668; CI: -0.947-0.389; p < .001), EELV (SMD: -0.615; CI: -1.102-0.219; p = .013), but not A-a gradient (SMD: 0.218; CI: -0.273-0.710; p = .384). HR, mAP, LVEDV, SV, CO, E/A and EF were not affected. The risks of pneumothorax (proportion: 0.008; CI: 0.002-0.014; p = .138) and hemothorax (proportion: 0.006; CI: 0.001-0.011; p = .962) were negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural effusion drainage improves oxygenation of critically ill patients. It is a safe procedure. Further studies are needed to assess the hemodynamic effects of pleural drainage.