DYNLL1 accelerates cell cycle via ILF2/CDK4 axis to promote hepatocellular carcinoma development and palbociclib sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Disorder of cell cycle represents as a major driver of hepatocarcinogenesis and constitutes an attractive therapeutic target. However, identifying key genes that respond to cell cycle-dependent treatments still facing critical challenges in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Increasing evidence indicates that dynein light chain 1 (DYNLL1) is closely related to cell cycle progression and plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. In this study, we explored the role of DYNLL1 in the regulation of cell cycle progression in HCC. METHODS: We analysed clinical specimens to assess the expression and predictive value of DYNLL1 in HCC. The oncogenic role of DYNLL1 was determined by gain or loss-of-function experiments in vitro, and xenograft tumour, liver orthotopic, and DEN/CCl4-induced mouse models in vivo. Mass spectrometry analysis, RNA sequencing, co-immunoprecipitation assays, and forward and reverse experiments were performed to clarify the mechanism by which DYNLL1 activates the interleukin-2 enhancer-binding factor 2 (ILF2)/CDK4 signalling axis. Finally, the sensitivity of HCC cells to palbociclib and sorafenib was assessed by apoptosis, cell counting kit-8, and colony formation assays in vitro, and xenograft tumour models and liver orthotopic models in vivo. RESULTS: DYNLL1 was significantly higher in HCC tissues than that in normal liver tissues and closely related to the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with HCC. Importantly, DYNLL1 was identified as a novel hepatocarcinogenesis gene from both in vitro and in vivo evidence. Mechanistically, DYNLL1 could interact with ILF2 and facilitate the expression of ILF2, then ILF2 could interact with CDK4 mRNA and delay its degradation, which in turn activates downstream G1/S cell cycle target genes CDK4. Furthermore, palbociclib, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, represents as a promising therapeutic strategy for DYNLL1-overexpressed HCC, alone or particularly in combination with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Our work uncovers a novel function of DYNLL1 in orchestrating cell cycle to promote HCC development and suggests a potential synergy of CDK4/6 inhibitor and sorafenib for the treatment of HCC patients, especially those with increased DYNLL1.

Targeting MS4A4A on tumour-associated macrophages restores CD8+ T-cell-mediated antitumour immunity.

OBJECTIVE: Checkpoint immunotherapy unleashes T-cell control of tumours but is suppressed by immunosuppressive myeloid cells. The transmembrane protein MS4A4A is selectively highly expressed in tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs). Here, we aimed to reveal the role of MS4A4A+ TAMs in regulating the immune escape of tumour cells and to develop novel therapeutic strategies targeting TAMs to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in colorectal cancer. DESIGN: The inhibitory effect of MS4A4A blockade alone or combined with ICI treatment on tumour growth was assessed using murine subcutaneous tumour or orthotopic transplanted models. The effect of MS4A4A blockade on the tumour immune microenvironment was assessed by flow cytometry and mass cytometry. RNA sequencing and western blot analysis were used to further explore the molecular mechanism by which MS4A4A promoted macrophages M2 polarisation. RESULTS: MS4A4A is selectively expressed by TAMs in different types of tumours, and was associated with adverse clinical outcome in patients with cancer. In vivo inhibition of MS4A4A and anti-MS4A4A monoclonal antibody treatment both curb tumour growth and improve the effect of ICI therapy. MS4A4A blockade treatment reshaped the tumour immune microenvironment, resulting in reducing the infiltration of M2-TAMs and exhausted T cells, and increasing the infiltration of effector CD8+ T cells. Anti-MS4A4A plus anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy remained effective in large, treatment-resistant tumours and could induce complete regression when further combined with radiotherapy. Mechanistically, MS4A4A promoted M2 polarisation of macrophages by activating PI3K/AKT pathway and JAK/STAT6 pathway. CONCLUSION: Targeting MS4A4A could enhance the ICI efficacy and represent a new anticancer immunotherapy.