Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current.

Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.

O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da direção da corrente elétrica na resistência da união resina composta-dentina usando três sistemas adesivos. Dentes molares humanos foram distribuídos de acordo com o sistema adesivo (dois passos autocondicionante - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; e um passo autocondicionante - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; e dois passos convencional - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), a direção da corrente elétrica (sem corrente elétrica - controle, correntes elétricas direta e reversa - 35µA) e tempo de armazenamento (24h - imediato e 6 meses). Blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) foram aderidos à dentina. Amostras de dentina-resina foram produzidas e armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC por 24 horas e 6 meses para o teste de resistência da união à microtração (µTBS) (n = 10; ~12 palitos por dente). Os padrões de fratura foram analisados ​​em estereomicroscópio e classificados em falhas coesiva na dentina, coesiva na resina, adesiva ou mista. A penetração do adesivo na dentina e a formação da camada híbrida foram avaliadas em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV). Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA três fatores seguidos pelo teste post hoc de Tukey (α = 0,05). Não houve diferenças na µTBS quando os sistemas adesivos foram aplicados sob as correntes elétricas direta e reversa, mas ambas as correntes elétricas aumentaram a µTBS para todos os sistemas adesivos. SBU apresentou os menores valores de µTBS para o grupo controle em ambos os tempos de armazenamento e para a corrente elétrica direta em 6 meses de armazenamento. Falhas adesivas foram mais frequente em todos os grupos. A corrente elétrica formou longos tags resinosos para todos os sistemas adesivos. O armazenamento por 6 meses não diminuiu significativamente os valores de µTBS. Ambos os sentidos da corrente elétrica (cargas positivas e negativas) a 35µA podem aumentar a µTBS dos sistemas adesivos testados à dentina.

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current

Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da direção da corrente elétrica na resistência da união resina composta-dentina usando três sistemas adesivos. Dentes molares humanos foram distribuídos de acordo com o sistema adesivo (dois passos autocondicionante - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; e um passo autocondicionante - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; e dois passos convencional - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), a direção da corrente elétrica (sem corrente elétrica - controle, correntes elétricas direta e reversa - 35µA) e tempo de armazenamento (24h - imediato e 6 meses). Blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) foram aderidos à dentina. Amostras de dentina-resina foram produzidas e armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC por 24 horas e 6 meses para o teste de resistência da união à microtração (µTBS) (n = 10; ~12 palitos por dente). Os padrões de fratura foram analisados ​​em estereomicroscópio e classificados em falhas coesiva na dentina, coesiva na resina, adesiva ou mista. A penetração do adesivo na dentina e a formação da camada híbrida foram avaliadas em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV). Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA três fatores seguidos pelo teste post hoc de Tukey (α = 0,05). Não houve diferenças na µTBS quando os sistemas adesivos foram aplicados sob as correntes elétricas direta e reversa, mas ambas as correntes elétricas aumentaram a µTBS para todos os sistemas adesivos. SBU apresentou os menores valores de µTBS para o grupo controle em ambos os tempos de armazenamento e para a corrente elétrica direta em 6 meses de armazenamento. Falhas adesivas foram mais frequente em todos os grupos. A corrente elétrica formou longos tags resinosos para todos os sistemas adesivos. O armazenamento por 6 meses não diminuiu significativamente os valores de µTBS. Ambos os sentidos da corrente elétrica (cargas positivas e negativas) a 35µA podem aumentar a µTBS dos sistemas adesivos testados à dentina.

Abstract Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.

Incorporation of Arginine to Commercial Orthodontic Light-Cured Resin Cements-Physical, Adhesive, and Antibacterial Properties.

(1) Background: The amino acid arginine is now receiving great attention due to its potential anti-caries benefits. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and antimicrobial potential (CFU) of two arginine-containing orthodontic resin cements. (2) Methods: Forty bovine incisors were separated into four groups (n = 10): Orthocem, Orthocem + arginine (2.5 wt%), Transbond XT, and Transbond XT + arginine (2.5 wt%). The brackets were fixed to the flat surface of the enamel, and after 24 h the SBS was evaluated using the universal testing machine (Instron). For the UTS test, hourglass samples (n = 10) were made and tested in a mini-testing machine (OM-100, Odeme). For the antibacterial test (colony forming unit-CFU), six cement discs from each group were made and exposed to Streptococcus mutans UA159 biofilm for 7 days. The microbiological experiment was performed by serial and triplicate dilutions. The data from each test were statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). (3) Results: The enamel SBS mean values of Transbond XT were statistically higher than those of Orthocem, both with and without arginine (p = 0.02033). There was no significant difference in the SBS mean values between the orthodontic resin cements, either with or without arginine (p = 0.29869). The UTS of the Transbond XT was statistically higher than the Orthocem, but the addition of arginine at 2.5 wt% did not influence the UTS for either resin cement. The Orthocem + arginine orthodontic resin cement was able to significantly reduce S. mutans growth, but no difference was observed for the Transbond XT (p = 0.03439). (4) Conclusion: The incorporation of arginine to commercial orthodontic resin cements may be an efficient preventive strategy to reduce bacterial growth without compromising their adhesive and mechanical properties.

Electric current effects on bond strength, nanoleakage, degree of conversion and dentinal infiltration of adhesive systems.

To evaluate the effect of three adhesive systems applied under electric current on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and degree of conversion (DC). Molar teeth were restored with the aid of three adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond 2-SB2; Clearfil SE Bond-CSE; and Single Bond Universal-SBU) under different electric current intensities (0 µA; 25 µA; and 50 µA). Composite resin blocks were built up in increments (2 mm) and sectioned into 1 × 1 mm beams. The µTBS was tested after 24 h and 1 y distilled water storages. Samples (n = 10) from 24 h to 1 y storages were immersed in a 50% ammoniacal silver nitrate solution and submitted to scanning electron microscopy. The silver nitrate in the hybrid layer was quantified (ImageJ software). The adhesive systems' dentinal infiltration was analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy was used to measure the DC. The µTBS data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (time vs. electric current) and Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05). Quantitative nanoleakage data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (electric current vs. adhesive) and Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05). DC data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05) for each adhesive system. The electric current statistically increased the µTBS for SB2 and CSE in 24 h storage, as well as for SB2, CSE and SBU in 1 y storage. No significant difference was observed between storage time for CSE and SBU. When compared to the control, electric currents (25 µA and 50 µA) showed significantly higher DC mean values for SB2 and SBU, and had no effect on CSE. The electric currents (25 µA and 50 µA) reduced the adhesive system's nanoleakage after 1-year storage, and improved the infiltration of SB2 and CSE. Both electric current intensities improved dentinal interface stability.

Effect of Electric Current-assisted Application of Adhesives on their Bond Strength and Quality.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of the application of different electric currents on dentin bonding and resin infiltration of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred four sound third molars were selected and divided in groups according to the adhesive (self-etch [CSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake], universal [SBU, Single Bond Universal, 3M Oral Care], and etch-and-rinse [SB2, Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2), 3M Oral Care]) and electrical current used (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 µA). Light curing was performed for 10 s with an LED-curing unit at 1000 mW/cm2. Composite blocks were constructed of nanofilled composite in increments of 2 mm, which were light cured for 20 s. Specimens were sectioned into sticks with a cross-sectional area of ~1 mm2 and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) testing (n = 8) was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. The bonding quality (n = 2) of adhesives applied with or without 35-µA electric current was evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Bond strengths were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: CSE presented the highest µTBS for all electrical currents tested. For CSE and SBU, electrical currents from 0-20 µA showed the lowest µTBS. Electrical currents from 0-10 and 20-25 µA yielded the lowest µTBS for SB2. CSE and SB2 applied under 35 µA showed a greater number of resin tags in dentin tubules. Fluorescein penetration into the hybrid layer was found for SBU applied without electric current. CONCLUSION: The application of adhesives using 35-µA electric current improved the bond strength and quality of the adhesive interface.