The effect of the Great Recession on the demand for general oral health care and orthodontic care.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to quantify how the Great Recession impacted the demand for general oral health care and orthodontic care in the United States. The authors conducted an analysis to help dentists anticipate changes in demand for care during future economic downturns. METHODS: The authors analyzed Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data for the period 2003 through 2015. Data plotting for the various factors considered showed patient demand before, during, and after the Great Recession, including an indication of postrecession recovery. Statistical significance across time was determined using a χ2 test. The point estimates and statistical inferences took into account the complex survey design of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: General dentist visits declined slowly and steadily during the Great Recession, reaching a low of 38.4% in 2010, and have not shown significant signs of recovery. Orthodontic visits also declined to an all-time low of 2.5% in 2010, although they have somewhat recovered. Out-of-pocket expenditures were lower in 2015 than in 2003 for general dental and orthodontic care. CONCLUSION: The effects of the Great Recession resulted in a decrease in the demand for oral health care, differing for general oral health care and orthodontic care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings, especially in combination with leading indicators for economic downturns, will allow dentists to better plan and use strategies for maintaining practice stability during periods of reduced demand for care.

Simple indicators for projecting short-term dental market fluctuations.

BACKGROUND: There have been fluctuations over time in dental care expenditures in the United States. This project aims to develop simple indicators that are easily available to people and that can be useful to predict short-term market fluctuations. METHODS: The authors analyzed data concerning 30 variables for the period of 1980 through 2012 for correlations with dental care expenditures during that period, looking for factors that historically moved in a highly correlated manner, either positively or negatively, with dental care expenditures. The authors lagged the factors to determine their potential predictive value for dental care expenditures. RESULTS: Personal consumption expenditures and gross domestic product emerged as valid leading indicators for predicting short-term dental market fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Two simple measures that are easily available to dentists and others can serve as indicators of short-term fluctuations in the dental marketplace. Their validity as indicators can, and should, be monitored regularly. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: These indicators can be of significant value for practitioners in being alerted to potential market changes and planning to accommodate these changes. Combined, these factors can tell what changes are coming and when they have arrived.

Practice settings and dentists' job satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The nature and organization of dental practice is changing. The aim of this study was to explore how job satisfaction among dentists is associated with dental practice setting. METHODS: A survey measured satisfaction with income, benefits, hours worked, clinical autonomy, work-life balance, emotional exhaustion, and overall satisfaction among dentists working in large group, small group, and solo practice settings; 2,171 dentists responded. The authors used logistic regression to measure differences in reported levels of satisfaction across practice settings. RESULTS: Dentists working in small group settings reported the most satisfaction overall. Dentists working in large group settings reported more satisfaction with income and benefits than dentists in solo practice, as well as having the least stress. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest possible advantages and disadvantages of working in different types of practice settings. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists working in different practice settings reported differences in satisfaction. These results may help dentists decide which practice setting is best for them.

Sesquicentennial review: the making of a profession.

I shook my head on many occasions as I contemplated the changes in dentistry that have occurred over the past 150 years that I would discuss in this article, often thinking to myself, "How could the early dentists have possibly practiced dentistry every day under those circumstances and with those tools?" It made my own clinical career seem pretty easy but engendered in me great admiration for my predecessors and our profession.

Increasing productivity in dental practice: the role of ancillary personnel.

Dentistry has achieved substantial improvements in productivity which have the effect of making more care available at reasonable cost. Data are presented documenting trends in productivity. These are analyzed with respect to number of dentists, hours worked by dentists, and the use of ancillary personal in dental offices. There is strong evidence linking increased productivity to the use of ancillary personnel. The history of creation, recognition, and integration of ancillary personnel into dental practice is also presented.

Evolving trends in size and structure of group dental practices in the United States.

In this study, the authors examined recent trends in the growth of dental establishments and dental firms, including geographic location. In this article, they also present information about the demographic characteristics of dentists who work in a dental practice that is part of a larger company that delivers dental care in multiple locations. The number of dental establishments (single locations) and the average size of these establishments grew from 1992 to 2007. Large multi-unit dental firms grew in terms of number of establishments and the percentage of total receipts. Large multi-unit dental firms represent a small but growing segment of the dental market. Dentists less than thirty-five years old were most likely to work in a practice that was part of a larger company, and females were more likely than males to work in such a setting. The percentage of dentists working in these settings was also found to vary by region and state. The authors present a typology of dental group practice and suggest that future research should take into account the differences so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn and generalizations across categories are not made.

Economic impact of dental hygienists on solo dental practices.

The fact that a significant percentage of dentists employ dental hygienists raises an important question: Are dental practices that utilize a dental hygienist structurally and operationally different from practices that do not? This article explores differences among dental practices that operate with and without dental hygienists. Using data from the American Dental Association's 2003 Survey of Dental Practice, a random sample survey of U.S. dentists, descriptive statistics were used to compare selected characteristics of solo general practitioners with and without dental hygienists. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of dental hygienists on the gross billings and net incomes of solo general practitioners. Differences in practice characteristics--such as hours spent in the practice and hours spent treating patients, wait time for a recall visit, number of operatories, square feet of office space, net income, and gross billings--were found between solo general practitioners who had dental hygienists and those who did not. Solo general practitioners with dental hygienists had higher gross billings. Higher gross billings would be expected, as would higher expenses. However, net incomes of those with dental hygienists were also higher. In contrast, the mean waiting time for a recall visit was higher among dentists who employed dental hygienists. Depending on personal preferences, availability of qualified personnel, etc., dentists who do not employ dental hygienists but have been contemplating that path may want to further research the benefits and opportunities that may be realized.

Dental therapists in general dental practices: an economic evaluation.

Dental access disparities are well documented and have been recognized as a national problem. Their major cause is the lack of reasonable Medicaid reimbursement rates for the underserved. Specifically, Medicaid reimbursement rates for children average 40 percent below market rates. In addition, most state Medicaid programs do not cover adults. To address these issues, advocates of better oral health for the underserved are considering support for a new allied provider--a dental therapist--capable of providing services at a lower cost per service and in low-income and rural areas. Using a standard economic analysis, this study estimated the potential cost, price, utilization, and dentist's income effects of dental therapists employed in general dental practices. The analysis is based on national general dental practice data and the broadest scope of responsibility for dental therapists that their advocates have advanced, including the ability to provide restorations and extractions to adults and children, training for three years, and minimum supervision. Assuming dental therapists provide restorative, extraction, and pulpal services to patients of all ages and dental hygienists continue to deliver all hygiene services, the mean reduction in a general practice costs ranges between 1.57 and 2.36 percent. For dental therapists treating children only, the range is 0.31 to 0.47 percent. The effects on price and utilization are even smaller. In addition, the effects on most dentists' gross income, hours of work, and net income are negative. The estimated economic impact of dental therapists in the United States on private dental practice is very limited; therefore, the demand for dental therapists by private practices also would probably be very limited.

The effects of insurance carrier market power on dentists and patients.

BACKGROUND: Market power among dental insurance carriers is a carrier's ability to reimburse dentists at rates below what would exist in more competitive areas. Competition among carriers for dentists' participation in their networks protects dentists from highly discounted fees. The authors examined the extent to which dental insurance carriers facing less competition increase fee discounts. METHODS: The authors selected a sample of dentists from listings of general practitioners. They identified 219 metropolitan areas and contacted 11,542 dentists in those areas by mail, telephone or both. A total of 8,017 dentists completed surveys (a response rate of 69.46 percent). The authors' key focus was the possible relationship between carrier market power and the size of the fee discount. The authors compared discounts across metropolitan areas with their differing levels of insurance coverage and carrier market shares. RESULTS: Carrier market power was directly related to the sizes of fee discounts. The larger discounts were found where there was significant dental insurance coverage and few carriers providing this coverage. Dentists' net incomes were significantly less in areas with larger fee discounts. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dental insurance carrier market power leads to increased fee discounts. These higher discounts reduce dentists' earnings. Although the larger discounts may result in lower overall patient costs, this patient benefit is temporary. Ultimately, the number of practicing dentists in these communities will decrease as dentists seek improved practicing conditions elsewhere. This reduction will lead to overall fee increases until the earning potential of dentists is restored.

Orthodontic dental patients and expenditures--2004.

INTRODUCTION: In this article, we describe recent trends in the age of patients receiving orthodontic services and look at how expenditures for these services are related to patient age and income level. METHODS: These findings are based on 3 national health expenditure surveys sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research conducted in 1987, 1996, and 2004. RESULTS: Recent increases in the number of patients receiving orthodontic services were largely due to an increase in the overall population. There has been a shift in the age distribution of patients receiving such services. Children 8 to 18 made up a greater percentage of all patients receiving orthodontic services, but there were fewer adult patients aged 19 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: Children 8 to 18 years old made up a larger percentage of patients who received orthodontic services in 2004 compared with 1996 and 1987. The percentage of total dental expenditures of children 8 to 18 for orthodontic services might increase in the future because of less need for restorative services among this segment of the population.

The dental care of U.S. children: access, use and referrals by nondentist providers, 2003.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in oral health care services have not reached evenly across every segment of American society. The authors examine the role of nondentist practitioners in referring child patients for dental care by analyzing data from the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center for Health Statistics. METHODS: The authors provide national estimates of the percentage of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States aged 2 through 17 years who had a dental visit, who had a dental checkup and who received advice from a nondentist health care provider to have a dental checkup. RESULTS: Overall, 38 percent of all poor, near-poor or low-income children and 60 percent of all middle- or high-income children aged 2 through 17 years reported having had a dental checkup during 2003. The authors observed no significant differences between poor, near-poor and low-income children and higher-income children in terms of having been advised by a nondentist health care provider to have a dental checkup. CONCLUSION: Although income may not predict the likelihood of patients' receiving advice from a nondentist health care provider to have a dental checkup, children from families with higher levels of income were more likely to seek dental care than were children from families with lower levels of income. Practice Implications. Efforts to increase access to dental care should aim to maximize the benefit of advice provided by nondentist health care practitioners to receive a dental checkup, so that children from families with limited income are as likely to receive a dental checkup as are children from families with higher levels of income.

The role dentists can play in mass casualty and disaster events.

Dentistry has valuable assets, both in personnel and facilities, to bring to the initial response to a mass casualty event when the local traditional medical system is overwhelmed. This article describes the services dentists can provide to allow physicians to provide the services only they can provide. The education and training of dentists that is required for preparation and the need to develop an integrated emergency response plan are discussed.

Foreign-trained dentists licensed in the United States: exploring their origins.

BACKGROUND: The authors explored the origins of foreign-trained dentists seeking licensure in the United States. METHODS: The authors analyzed data received from the American Dental Association Department of Testing Services for candidates who took the National Board Dental Examinations (NBDE) Part II from 2002 through 2005. They also established proxies for the information they sought in lieu of existing direct data. RESULTS: A total of 4,136 candidates took NBDE Part II from 2002 through 2005. The greatest number of foreign-trained dentists originated from India, the Philippines and Colombia. CONCLUSION: The greatest number of potential U.S. dental licensees are primarily from Asia, the Middle East and South America. However, precise studies need to be conducted to generate more exact data about foreign-trained dentists who practice in the United States. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The source of international dental graduates seeking licensure in the United States has implications for the licensure process and for the potential accreditation of foreign dental schools.

The differences between dental and medical care: implications for dental benefit plan design.

BACKGROUND: Dental benefit plans have grown since they were introduced in the 1960s. More than one-half of the American population is covered by a private dental benefit plan today. In general, these plans have been designed to mirror medical insurance plans, despite the fact that dental care is significantly different from medical care. The author discusses the differences and how they should influence dental benefit plan design. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between dental care and medical care, how oral diseases are treated, the diseases' natural histories without treatment and the organization of the dental profession compared with that of the medical profession require that dental benefit plans be designed differently than medical insurance plans if they are to be effective. The operation of dental and medical plans requires different mind-sets. IMPLICATIONS: If they are to be effective, dental benefit plans and attempts to control the costs of those plans must be designed with the specific nature of oral diseases and the organization of the dental profession in mind.

The impact of concentration in dental insurance markets on dental reimbursement in Minnesota.

The following article has been prepared by the American Dental Association (ADA) at the request of the Minnesota Dental Association (MDA). The article is the culmination of a rigorous national study by the ADA to measure the concentration of dental insurance in major dental marketplaces around the country. Five Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA's)from Minnesota were compared to other MSA's around the country. The results of this study are very significant for dentists and dental patients in Minnesota. Minnesota' practicing dental community may find the results of the study to be somewhat disturbing. Nevertheless, the MDA believes that it is important to share the results of this study with MDA members and others in the Minnesota dental community. It is important to consider both the study's short-term ramifications, as well as its long-term implications, as we attempt to better understand Minnesota's dental marketplace. It is also important for MDA members to know that the ADA brought the results of this study as they relate to the Minnesota Dental Marketplace to the appropriate federal agencies. The ADA believed that these agencies might choose to develop it into an anti-trust case. After reviewing the matter and working with the ADA over a long period of time, these agencies decided that they would not proceed with a Minnesota-based anti-trust case; additional information beyond what the ADA was legally able to provide was needed by the federal agencies in order for them to proceed. The MDA will continue to analyze and respond to these dental marketplace developments.