Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 22(2): 151-5, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10024127

ABSTRACT

Electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in the diagnosis of cervical and lumbosacral radiculopathy, but the agreement between the two studies is unknown. We retrospectively studied 47 patients with a clinical history compatible with either cervical or lumbosacral radiculopathy who were evaluated with both an EMG and a spine MRI within 2 months of each other. Among these patients, 55% had an EMG abnormality and 57% had an MRI abnormality that correlated with the clinically estimated level of radiculopathy. The two studies agreed in a majority (60%) of patients, with both normal in 11 and both abnormal in 17; however, only one study was abnormal in a significant minority (40%), suggesting that the two studies remain complementary diagnostic modalities. The agreement was higher in patients with abnormal findings on neurologic examination, underscoring the difficulty of confirming the diagnosis in mild radiculopathy.


Subject(s)
Electromyography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiculopathy/diagnosis , Spinal Nerve Roots/pathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lumbosacral Region/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 169(5): 1355-7, 1997 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9353458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared patient treatment with imaging strategy in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and intermediate-probability lung scans (IPLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 214 consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE with IPLS. RESULTS: Treatment (full anticoagulation, filter placement, or both) was given in 66 (31%) of 214 patients. Only 37% of patients were treated on the basis of definitive diagnostic imaging results. Most patients (134 [63%] of 214) were treated without an imaging diagnosis: 30 (14%) of 214 patients were treated for acute PE on clinical grounds, and the diagnosis of PE was not excluded in 104 (49%) of 214 patients. CONCLUSION: Most patients with IPLS are treated without a definitive imaging diagnosis. This lack of diagnosis may result in the overtreatment of patients who do not have acute PE or, more importantly, in the undertreatment of patients who do have acute PE. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of the current management strategies on patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Diagnostic Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Radiography , Radionuclide Imaging , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography , Vena Cava Filters
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...