Kinematic efficacy of supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral levels in thoracolumbosacral deformity correction with and without pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3: an in vitro cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is performed to treat rigid, sagittal spinal deformities, but high rates of implant failure are reported. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion has been proposed to reduce this risk, but biomechanical investigation is lacking. The goal of this study was to quantify the (1) destabilizing effects of a lumbar osteotomy and (2) contribution of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the lumbosacral junction as recommended in literature. METHODS: Fourteen fresh human thoracolumbosacral spines (T12-S1) were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Bilateral pedicle screws/rods (BPS) were inserted at T12-S1, cross connectors (CC) at T12-L1 and L5-S1, and anterior interbody spacers (S) at L4-5 and L5-S1. In one group, PSO was performed in seven specimens at L3. All specimens were sequentially tested in (1) Intact; (2) BPS; (3) BPS + CC; (4) BPS + S; and (5) BPS + S + CC; a second group of seven spines were tested in the same sequence without PSO. Mixed-model ANOVA with repeated measures was performed (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: At the osteotomy site (L2-L4), in FE, BPS, BPS + CC, BPS + S, BPS + CC + S reduced motion to 11.2, 12.9, 10.9, and 11.4%, respectively, with significance only found in BPS and BPS + S construction (p ≤ 0.05). All constructs significantly reduced motion across L2-L4 in the absence of PSO, across all loading modes (p ≤ 0.05). PSO significantly destabilized L2-L4 axial rotational stability, regardless of operative construction (p ≤ 0.05). Across L4-S1 and L2-S1, all instrumented constructs significantly reduced motion, in both PSO- and non-PSO groups, during all loading modes (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest anterior interbody fusion minimally immobilizes motion segments, and interbody devices may primarily act to maintain disc height. Additionally, lumbar osteotomy destabilizes axial rotational stability at the osteotomy site, potentially further increasing mechanical demand on posterior instrumentation. Clinical studies are needed to assess the impact of this treatment strategy.

An In Vitro Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cervical Extension Plates for Stabilizing Degenerated Adjacent Levels.

STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of 2 extender plates in a human cervical cadaveric model. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 2 extender plates, placed adjacent to initially implanted plates and to compare their biomechanical stability with traditional techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditionally, adjacent level degeneration is surgically treated by removing the previously implanted plate and extending the instrumentation to the new degenerated level. The exposure needed to remove the previously implanted plate may be extensive. To overcome these complications, cervical extension plates, which add-on to the initially implanted plate, were developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver cervical spines (C2-C7) were divided into 2 groups of 7 for a series of constructs to be tested. In group 1, an extender plate, which attaches to its own primary plate, was tested. In group 2, a universal extender plate, which can be placed adjacent to any previously implanted plate, was tested. The specimens prepared were mounted on a 6-degree-of-freedom spine simulator and were sequentially tested in the following order: (1) intact; (2) single-level plate; (3) single-level plate with extender plates; and (4) 2-level plate. An unconstrained pure moment of ±1.5 N m was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS: All instrumented constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared with the intact condition. In both the groups, single-level plates with adjacent extender plates demonstrated stability comparable to their respective 2-level plates in all loading modes. CONCLUSIONS: Extender plates give surgeons the opportunity to treat adjacent levels without removing the primary implants, which may reduce the overall risk of damage to vital neurovascular structures. From this cadaveric biomechanical model, both types of extender plates prove to be viable options for treating adjacent level degeneration.

Range of motion after thoracolumbar corpectomy: evaluation of analogous constructs with a novel low-profile anterior dual-rod system and a traditional dual-rod system.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the biomechanical stability of traditional and low-profile thorocolumbar anterior instrumentation after a corpectomy with cross-connectors. Dual-rod anterior thoracolumbar lateral plates (ATLP) have been used clinically to stabilize the thorocolumbar spine. METHODS: The stability of a low-profile dual-rod system (LP DRS) and a traditional dual-rod system (DRS) was compared using a calf spine model. Two groups of seven specimens were tested intact and then in the following order: (1) ATLP with two cross-connectors and spacer; (2) ATLP with one cross-connector and spacer; (3) ATLP with spacer. Data were normalized to intact (100 %) and statistical analysis was used to determine between-group significances. RESULTS: Both constructs reduced motion compared to intact in flexion-extension and lateral bending. Axial rotation motion became unstable after the corpectomy and motion was greater than intact, even with two cross-connectors with both systems. Relative to their respective intact groups, LP DRS significantly reduced motion compared to analogous DRS in flexion-extension. The addition of cross-connectors reduced motion in all loading modes. CONCLUSIONS: The LP DRS provides 7.5 mm of reduced height with similar biomechanical performance. The reduced height may be beneficiary by reduced irritation and impingement on adjacent structures.

Use of Supplemental Short Pre-Contoured Accessory Rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy Posterior Rods Reduces Primary Rod Strain and Range of Motion Across the Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of 4-rod reconstruction, rod material, and anterior column support on motion and surface rod strain in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can correct significant sagittal deformity of the lumbar spine; however, revision rates are high. To reduce rod strain and the incidence of rod fracture, clinical use of multi-rod construction, cobalt chrome (CoCr) alloy rods, and interbody spacers adjacent to PSO has been proposed. Investigating both motion and rod strain is necessary to determine the biomechanical efficacy of these techniques. METHODS: Five specimens (T12-S1) underwent PSO at L3 with pedicle screw stabilization at L1-S1. Pedicle subtraction was adjusted to achieve a final lordosis of 70°. Flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending, and axial rotation were applied. Linear strain gauges measured surface rod strain during FE on primary and accessory rods at PSO level. Testing evaluated (1) accessory rods (4-Rod) added at PSO level versus primary rods (2-Rod); (2) Ti versus CoCr rods; and (3) lateral interbody spacers (S) inserted adjacent to PSO. One-way and three-way analysis of variance was performed (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: All constructs significantly reduced FE and lateral bending motion relative to intact (P < 0.001). The main effect of accessory rods in reducing FE motion was significant (P = 0.021). Accessory and CoCr rods reduced relative surface strain on the primary rod, irrespective of construct (P < 0.001). CoCr 4-Rod + S provided the greatest reduction in strain (76% decrease; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Accessory and CoCr rods provided greatest reduction in motion and rod strain at PSO level. Interbody devices minimally affected motion-induced strain and might act primarily to maintain disc height. Clinicians must assess whether surface strain and motion reduction minimize the incidence of rod fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Rod Strain After Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Biomechanical Study.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can provide major sagittal correction for adult spinal deformity, sometimes achieving correction greater than 30°. Surgeons have reported failure rates up to 30% within 2 years, increasing to 46% after 4 to 5 years (SDC Figure 1, http://links.lww.com/BRS/B87). Revision following failure is difficult on the patient. PSO has achieved positive outcomes, but when used to correct posture in older patients with spinal deformity and fixed sagittal imbalance, rod breakage often leads to multiple surgical revisions. These complications must be avoided.

Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.

OBJECTIVE: Insufficient biomechanical data exist from comparisons of the stability of expandable lateral cages with that of static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare the relative rigidity of L4-5 expandable lateral interbody constructs with or without additive pedicle screw fixation with that of L4-5 static TLIF cages in a novel cadaveric spondylolisthesis model. METHODS: Eight human cadaver spines were used in this study. A spondylolisthesis model was created at the L4-5 level by creating 2 injuries. First, in each cadaver, a nucleotomy from 2 channels through the anterior side was created. Second, the cartilage of the facet joint was burred down to create a gap of 4 mm. Light-emitting-diode tracking markers were placed at L-3, L-4, L-5, and S-1. Specimens were tested in the following scenarios: intact model, bilateral pedicle screws, expandable lateral 18-mm-wide cage (alone, with unilateral pedicle screws [UPSs], and with bilateral pedicle screws [BPSs]), expandable lateral 22-mm-wide cage (alone, with UPSs, and with BPSs), and TLIF (alone, with UPSs, and with BPSs). Four of the spines were tested with the expandable lateral cages (18-mm cage followed by the 22-mm cage), and 4 of the spines were tested with the TLIF construct. All these constructs were tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. RESULTS: The TLIF-alone construct was significantly less stable than the 18- and 22-mm-wide lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) constructs and the TLIF constructs with either UPSs or BPSs. The LLIF constructs alone were significantly less stable than the TLIF construct with BPSs. However, there was no significant difference between the 18-mm LLIF construct with UPSs and the TLIF construct with BPSs in any of the loading modes. CONCLUSIONS: Expandable lateral cages with UPSs provide stability equivalent to that of a TLIF construct with BPSs in a degenerative spondylolisthesis model.

Is lateral stabilization enough in thoracolumbar burst fracture reconstruction? A biomechanical investigation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traditional reconstruction for burst fractures involves columnar support with posterior fixation at one or two levels cephalad/caudad; however, some surgeons choose to only stabilize the vertebral column. PURPOSE: The aim was to distinguish biomechanical differences in stability between a burst fracture stabilized through a lateral approach using corpectomy spacers of different end plate sizes with and without integrated screws and with and without posterior fixation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was an in vitro biomechanical study assessing thoracolumbar burst fracture stabilization. METHODS: Six human spines (T11-L3) were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom simulator enabling unconstrained range of motion (ROM) at ±6 N·m in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) after a simulated burst fracture at L1. Expandable corpectomy spacers with/without integrated screws (Fi/F; FORTIFY Integrated/FORTIFY; Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) were tested with different end plate sizes (21×23 mm, 22×40-50 mm). Posterior instrumentation (PI) via bilateral pedicle screws and rods was used one level above and one level below the burst fracture. Lateral plate (LP) fixation was tested. Devices were tested in the following order: intact; Fi21×23; Fi21×23+PI; F21×23+PI+LP; F21×23+LP; F22×40-50+LP; F22×40-50+PI+LP; Fi22×40-50+PI; Fi22×40-50. RESULTS: In FE and AR, constructs without PI showed no significant difference (p<.05) in stability compared with intact. In LB, F22×40-50+LP showed a significant increase in stability relative to intact, but no other construct without PI reached significance. In FE and LB, circumferential constructs were significantly more stable than intact. In AR, no construct showed significant differences in motion when compared with the intact condition. CONCLUSIONS: Constructs without posterior fixation were the least stable of all tested constructs. Circumferential fixation provided greater stability in FE and LB than lateral fixation and intact. Axial rotation showed no significant differences in any construct compared with the intact state.

A novel lateral lumbar integrated plate-spacer interbody implant: in vitro biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral spacers (LSs) are the standard of care for a lateral lumbar interbody fusion. However, various types of fixation, such as bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs), unilateral pedicle screws (UPSs), bilateral facet screws (BFSs), and lateral plates (LPs) have been reported to increase the stability of LSs. The biomechanics of a novel lateral interbody implant, which is an interbody spacer with an integrated plate and two bone screws (lateral integrated plate-spacer [IPS-L]), has not been investigated yet. PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical stability of IPS-L and LS with and without supplemental instrumentation. STUDY DESIGN: Human lumbar cadaveric study evaluating the biomechanical stability of an IPS-L. METHODS: Each of the six (L2-L5) spines was sequentially tested in intact; IPS-L; IPS-L+UPS; IPS-L+BPS; IPS-L+BFS; LS+BFS; LS+UPS; LS+BPS; LS; and LS+LP, using a load-control protocol in which a ±8 Nm moment was applied, for three cycles each, in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Data results were obtained from the third cycle. RESULTS: The IPS-L construct significantly reduced the range of motion (ROM) by 75% in FE, 70% in LB, and 57% in AR, compared with intact. Lateral integrated plate-spacer demonstrated similar biomechanical stability as LS+LP, and higher stability than the LS-alone construct, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The IPS-L evaluated in the present study demonstrated equivalent biomechanical stability compared with standard lateral interbody fusion constructs. The addition of BPSs to the IPS-L showed significant reduction in ROM in FE, and the addition of BFSs showed significant reduction in ROM in FE and AR, compared with the integrated plate-spacer alone construct. The IPS-L with supplemental fixation may be a viable option for lateral interbody fusion. Long-term clinical studies are further required to confirm these results.

Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled Investigational Device Exemption clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of the selectively constrained SECURE-C (Globus Medical, Audubon, PA) Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical total disc replacement has been developed as an alternative to ACDF by allowing segmental motion. Current cervical total disc replacement designs incorporate constrained and unconstrained metal-on-metal or metal-on-polymer articulating designs with various means of fixation. METHODS: A total of 380 patients from 18 investigational sites were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized, treated surgically, and evaluated postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Clinical outcomes include overall success, visual analogue scale pain (right arm, left arm, and neck), neck disability index, neurological status, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Status Survey questionnaires, range of motion, and adverse events. Bayesian statistical methods were used to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall success results demonstrated statistical superiority of the randomized SECURE-C group compared with the randomized ACDF group at 24 months, with a posterior probability of 100% using the protocol-specified criteria and 98.1% using Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria. At 24 months postoperatively, SECURE-C demonstrated clinically significant improvement in pain and function in terms of neck disability index, visual analogue scale, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. At 24 months, the percentage of patients experiencing secondary surgical interventions at the index level was statistically lower for the SECURE-C group (2.5%) than the ACDF group (9.7%). At 24 months, 84.6% of as-treated SECURE-C patients were range-of-motion successes. Satisfaction was high among SECURE-C patients. CONCLUSION: The selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc is as safe and effective as the standard of care, an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. SECURE-C is statistically superior in terms of overall success, index-level subsequent surgical procedures, and patient satisfaction, making it an attractive surgical option for patients with symptomatic cervical disc disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study conducted on cadaveric specimens. OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the biomechanical strength of the S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw to traditional iliac fixation and (2) to examine the effect of length and trajectory on the S2AI screw. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A recent technique to attain spinal fixation distal to S1 pedicle screws is the S2AI screw using either an open or a percutaneous approach with an altered S2 alar screw trajectory to obtain purchase in the ilium. A novel modification of the S2AI screw is placement with bicortical purchase in the ilium (quad-cortical screw). This may allow for a shorter-length screw with equivalent biomechanics. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric spines (L2-Pelvis) were fixed at L2 proximally and the pubis distally. Pedicle screws were placed from L3-S1 with S2AI screw lengths of 65-mm, 80-mm, or 90-mm iliac screws. S2AI screws were tested with and without quad-cortical purchase. Each specimen was tested on the 6 degrees of freedom spine simulator. A load control protocol with an unconstrained pure moment of 10 Nm was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation for a total of 3 load/unload cycles. The range of motion was normalized to the intact cadaveric spine (100%). RESULTS: All the instrumented constructs significantly reduced range of motion compared with the intact spine. The L3-S1 construct was statistically significantly less stable than all instrumented constructs in flexion-extension. There was statistically no significant difference between the S2AI screws of all lengths and the iliac screw constructs with offset connectors. CONCLUSION: S2AI screws are biomechanically as stable as the test constructs using iliac screws in all loading modes. Sixty-five-millimeter S2AI screws were biomechanically equivalent to 90-mm iliac screws and 80-mm S2AI screws. Quad-cortical purchase did not statistically significantly improve the biomechanical strength of S2AI screws. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Biomechanical comparison of spinopelvic reconstruction techniques in the setting of total sacrectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: To biomechanically test and evaluate 4 different methods of spinopelvic reconstruction techniques and determine the most biomechanically stable construct for stabilization of the spinopelvic junction after total sacrectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Total sacrectomy is necessary to treat a sacral tumor when it involves the S1 vertebra. Instrumentation and reconstruction of the lumbar spine and pelvis are required after total sacrectomy and can be achieved by various reconstruction techniques. Currently, the preferred method of spinopelvic fixation is controversial. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric (L1-pelvis) specimens were evaluated in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in a total sacrectomy model. Test constructs included (1) intact; (2) double-rod, double iliac screw (DDS); (3) single-rod, single iliac screw (SSS); (4) double iliac screw (DIS) fixation; and (5) modified Galveston technique (MGT). A load control protocol with 7.0 Nm moments applied at a rate of 1.5°/s was used to establish range of motion values for each tested construct on a 6-df spine motion simulator. Data were analyzed and normalized to intact. RESULTS: All instrumented constructs offered significant stability in all loading conditions compared with the intact condition. Stability offered by different constructs in all loading conditions trended as follows: DDS>DIS>SSS>MGT. Overall, the DDS construct provided 55%, 43%, and 60% more stability than SSS, DIS, and MGT, respectively. This was significant in flexion-extension when compared with SSS and in all loading conditions when compared with MGT. CONCLUSION: In the setting of total sacrectomy, the double-rod double iliac screw method provided the most rigid fixation, followed by DIS fixation, single-rod single screw, and the MGT. In spinopelvic reconstruction, the use of double iliac screws is recommended compared with single iliac screw fixation techniques when treating unstable conditions caused by total sacrectomy.

A biomechanical evaluation of a spacer with integrated plate for treating adjacent-level disease in the subaxial cervical spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent level degeneration (ALD) has been reported as one of the long-term consequences of anterior discectomy and fusion despite its clinical success in treating cervical pathologies. Traditionally, ALD is treated by replacing the previously implanted plate with a longer plate, which can lead to postoperative complications. The biomechanics of SIP in the adjacent level has not been investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the multidirectional stability of a spacer with integrated plate (SIP) in comparison to a traditional spacer and plate (TSP). STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a traditional spacer and plate construct in a human cervical cadaveric model. METHODS: Eight fresh human cervical (C2-C7) cadaver spines were mounted on a six degree-of-freedom spine simulator. The sequence of test constructs was: 1) Intact; 2) TSP (C4-C6) with SIP (C3-C4); and 3) TSP (C3-C6). An unconstrained moment of ±1.5 Nm was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) was measured by a digital motion analysis system. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA repeated measures. RESULTS: All instrumented constructs significantly reduced ROM compared to the intact condition. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two-level TSP with an adjacent SIP construct and three-level TSP construct in all loading modes. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical study shows that adding a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a two-level anterior plate demonstrates equivalent stability to a three-level anterior plate. The spacer with integrated plate, which preserves the originally plated fusion levels, may overcome the complications associated with the traditional technique of replacing the original plate with a longer plate. However, prospective clinical studies are required to address the clinical benefits and challenges, if any.

Kinematics of a selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc: comparisons to hybrid and circumferential fusion.

BACKGROUND: Despite encouraging clinical outcomes of one-level total disc replacements reported in literature, there is no compelling evidence regarding the stability following two-level disc replacement and hybrid constructs. The current study is aimed at evaluating the multidirectional kinematics of a two-level disc arthroplasty and hybrid construct with disc replacement adjacent to rigid circumferential fusion, compared to two-level fusion using a novel selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc. METHODS: Nine osteoligamentous lumbosacral spines (L1-S1) were tested in the following sequence: 1) Intact; 2) One-level disc replacement; 3) Hybrid; 4) Two-level disc replacement; and 5) Two-level fusion. Range of motion (at both implanted and adjacent level), and center of rotation in sagittal plane were recorded and calculated. FINDINGS: At the level of implantation, motion was restored when one-level disc replacement was used but tended to decrease with two-level disc arthroplasty. The findings also revealed that both one-level and two-level disc replacement and hybrid constructs did not significantly change adjacent level kinematics compared to the intact condition, whereas the two-level fusion construct demonstrated a significant increase in flexibility at the adjacent level. The location of center of rotation in the sagittal plane at L4-L5 for the one-level disc replacement construct was similar to that of the intact condition. INTERPRETATION: The one-level disc arthroplasty tended to mimic a motion profile similar to the intact spine. However, the two-level disc replacement construct tended to reduce motion and clinical stability of a two-level disc arthroplasty requires additional investigation. Hybrid constructs may be used as a surgical alternative for treating two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.

The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical plating increases stability and hence improves fusion rates to treat cervical spine pathologies, which are often symptomatic at multiple levels. However, plating is not without complications, such as dysphagia, injury to neural elements, and plate breakage. The biomechanics of a spacer with integrated plate system combined with posterior instrumentation (PI), in two-level and three-level surgical models, has not yet been investigated. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to biomechanically evaluate the multidirectional rigidity of spacer with integrated plate (SIP) at multiple levels as comparable to traditional spacers and plating. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro cervical cadaveric model. METHODS: Eight fresh human cervical (C2-C7) cadaver spines were tested under pure moments of ±1.5 Nm on spine simulator test frame. Each spine was tested in intact condition, with only anterior fixation and with both anterior and PI. Range of motion (ROM) was measured using Optotrak Certus (NDI, Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) motion analysis system in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) at the instrumented levels (C3-C6). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the surgical constructs showed significant reduction in motion compared with intact condition. In two-level fusion, SIP (C4-C6) construct significantly reduced ROM by 66.5%, 65.4%, and 60.3% when compared with intact in FE, LB, and AR, respectively. In three-level fusion, SIP (C3-C6) construct significantly reduced ROM by 65.8%, 66%, and 49.6% when compared with intact in FE, LB, and AR, respectively. Posterior instrumentation showed significant stability only in three-level fusion when compared with their respective anterior constructs. In both two-level and three-level fusion, SIP showed comparable stability to traditional spacer and plate constructs in all loading modes. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomically profiled spacer with integrated plate allows treatment of cervical disorders with fewer steps and less impact to cervical structures. In this biomechanical study, spacer with integrated plate construct showed comparable stability to traditional spacer and plate for two-level and three-level fusion. Posterior instrumentation showed significant effect only in three-level fusion. Clinical data are required for further validation of using spacer with integrated plate at multiple levels.

The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study investigating the effect of transverse connectors on posterior cervical stabilization system in a laminectomy model. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal design, number, and location of the transverse connectors in stabilizing long segment posterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the cervical spine, lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation is used for providing stability after decompression. Transverse connectors have been used to augment segmental posterior instrumentation. However, in the cervical region the optimal design, number, and the location of transverse connectors is not known. METHODS: Seven fresh human cervicothoracic cadaveric spines (C2-T1) were tested by applying ±1.5 Nm moments in flexion (F), extension (E), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). After testing the intact condition, LMS/rods were placed and then were tested with two different transverse connectors (top-loading connector [TL] and the head-to-head [HH] connector) in multiple levels, pre- and postlaminectomy (PL). RESULTS: LMS significantly reduced segmental motion by 77.2% in F, 75.6% in E, 86.6% in LB, and 86.1% in AR prelaminectomy and by 75.4% in F, 76% in E, 80.6% in LB, and 76.4% in AR postlaminectomy compared to intact (P < 0.05). Only in AR, PL constructs with HH connectors at C3 & C7, TL connectors at C4-C5 & C5-C6, and at C3-C4 & C6-C7 significantly reduced the range of motion by 12.9%, 11.9%, and 11.9%, respectively, compared to PL LMS (P < 0.05). No statistical significance was observed between TL connector and HH connector in all loading directions. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical advantage of transverse connectors is significant in AR, when using two connectors at the proximal and distal ends, compared to one connector. In a clinical setting, this data may guide surgeons on transverse connector configurations to consider during posterior cervical instrumentation.