Diabetes-related symptoms, acute complications and management of diabetes mellitus of patients who are receiving palliative care: a protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, an estimated 40 million people are in need of palliative care each year, but only 14% receive it. The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients receiving palliative care is higher than in the general population. This association is intended to grow as a result of the rising burden of DM worldwide, ageing populations and the improved overall survival time of several diseases over the last few decades. Recommendations for DM management in the context of palliative care are mainly based on expert opinion as there is a lack of suitable evidence base and randomised clinical trials in palliative care are scarce. The aim of our systematic review is to identify the best DM management practices in order to reduce important DM-related symptoms and acute complications in patients receiving palliative care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The authors will study the DM treatment and management literature, surveying the different approaches employed to treat adult palliative patients. Core health bibliographic databases will be searched from January 1990 to May 2019. Data sources will include Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and grey literature. Details regarding diet, oral and injectable glucose-lowering medicines, insulin regimens and blood glucose monitoring strategies will be evaluated. We defined the primary outcomes to compare between DM management approaches as the presence of symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia and polyphagia) and acute complications of DM (hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and diabetic ketoacidosis), and secondary outcomes as hospital admissions and deaths due to DM-related complications, health-related quality of life and glycaemic control. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review methodology does not require ethics approval due to the nature of the study design. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018115772.

Topical capsaicin for pain in osteoarthritis: a literature review / Capsaicina tópica para el dolor de la osteoartritis: una revisión de la literatura

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder worldwide. The predominant symptom, pain, is usually treated with acetaminophen or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, although they are associated with a significant risk of side effects. Topical capsaicin may represent an effective and safe alternative. The aim of this review is to examine the evidence for the efficacy and safety profile of topical capsaicin in the management of pain caused by osteoarthritis. Databases were searched for articles published between 2004 and 2016, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, using the search terms "capsaicin" and "osteoarthritis". When compared to placebo, it was found that topical capsaicin has a good safety profile and efficacy in reducing osteoarthritis pain of the hand, knee, hip or shoulder. However, the studies have significant limitations, the most important the difficulty of blinding. It is attributed to this review the strength of recommendation B (AU)

La osteoartritis es la enfermedad articular más común mundialmente. El síntoma predominante, el dolor, se trata generalmente con paracetamol oral o antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, a pesar de que están asociados con un riesgo significativo de efectos secundarios. Capsaicina tópica puede representar una alternativa eficaz y segura. El objetivo de esta revisión es examinar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia y del perfil de seguridad de la capsaicina en el tratamiento del dolor. Se realizaron búsquedas en bases de datos de artículos publicados entre 2004 y 2016, en portugués, inglés o español, utilizando los términos «capsaicina» y «osteoartritis». En comparación con el placebo, la capsaicina tiene un buen perfil de seguridad y eficacia en la reducción del dolor de la osteoartritis de la mano, la rodilla, la cadera o el hombro. Sin embargo, los estudios tienen limitaciones significativas, principalmente la dificultad de cegamiento. Se atribuye a esta revisión una fuerza de recomendación B (AU)

Topical capsaicin for pain in osteoarthritis: A literature review.

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder worldwide. The predominant symptom, pain, is usually treated with acetaminophen or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, although they are associated with a significant risk of side effects. Topical capsaicin may represent an effective and safe alternative. The aim of this review is to examine the evidence for the efficacy and safety profile of topical capsaicin in the management of pain caused by osteoarthritis. Databases were searched for articles published between 2004 and 2016, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, using the search terms "capsaicin" and "osteoarthritis". When compared to placebo, it was found that topical capsaicin has a good safety profile and efficacy in reducing osteoarthritis pain of the hand, knee, hip or shoulder. However, the studies have significant limitations, the most important the difficulty of blinding. It is attributed to this review the strength of recommendation B.

Hemoglobin Himeji and inconsistent hemoglobin A1c values: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin A1c is used to evaluate the glycemic control in patients with diabetes and is a risk marker for chronic complications of diabetes. Hemoglobin variants are reported to falsely lower or increase hemoglobin A1c test results. We present a case report of a patient with diabetes with discrepancy between fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c due to the presence of hemoglobin Himeji, a clinically silent and very rare hemoglobinopathy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old white woman, born and living in Portugal, with type 2 diabetes presented to the family physician for a routine visit. She had no active complaints, including history or symptoms of hypoglycemia, and her physical examination was unremarkable. A review of her laboratory data showed fasting plasma glucose of 190 mg/dL and a hemoglobin A1c of 4.1%. The remaining blood test results were clinically insignificant; a further review of her laboratory data over the past 4 years revealed that her fasting plasma glucose had ranged from 130 to 250 mg/dL and hemoglobin A1c was consistently lower than 5%. A study of hemoglobins detected 32.8% of abnormal hemoglobin. Genetic sequencing identified a heterozygous mutation compatible with hemoglobin Himeji (c.422C>A; p.Ala141Asp). We tracked her family (three sons, six grandchildren, and two greatgrandchildren) for the presence of this hemoglobin variant, but none had this hemoglobinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of hemoglobin A1c in the follow-up and treatment of diabetes, the factors that interfere with its results must be known to ensure a correct estimation of the degree of glycemic control and a proper management of the disease. Therefore, health professionals should suspect the existence of hemoglobin variants when: the hemoglobin A1c value is above 15% or below the lower limit of its reference interval; there is a significant modification in its result coinciding with a change in assay methods; and there is a low correlation between plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c. In patients with hemoglobin Himeji, alternate ways of monitoring glycemic control (fructosamine or glycated serum albumin) should be used.