Mini-Skin Incision for Carotid Endarterectomy: Neurological Morbidity and Health-related Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Cranial and cervical nerve (CCN) injury is recognized as a possible complication after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), which may result in minor local neurologic deficiencies and significant discomfort for the patient. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a mini-skin incision (<5 cm) on the CCN injury after CEA in comparison to standard longitudinal incision of 12-15 cm in a high volume center, and to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in those patients who had undergone both types of the skin incision. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2019, 446 CEAs (47.3%) were performed through a standard neck incision of 12-15 cm (group A), while 496 (52.7%) were performed through a mini-skin incision (<5 cm) (group B). Sixty-two patients underwent standard neck incision on one side and mini-skin incision on the other side (subgroup B). The main outcome measures were stroke, death, CCN injuries, cervical hematoma rates, and reinterventions. The HRQOL was assessed at baseline and after 30 days using Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 and 6 disease-specific modified Likert scales. RESULTS: The stroke and death rate at 30 days was 1.12% in group A and 1% in group B (P = 1). The incidence of CCN deficits was significantly lower in group B (5.1%) in comparison to group A (13.4%) (P < 0.001). The cervical hematoma was more common after standard incision (4.9% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.02). HRQOL at 1 month showed that the outcomes after mini-skin incision were significantly better for less difficulty with eating/swallowing and neck pain (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CEA through a small incision (<5 cm) may reduce CCN complications without additional perioperative neurologic risks. As validated by patients with bilateral disease who experienced both surgical techniques, mini-skin incision is also associated with better HRQOL at 1 month, particularly with regard to eating/swallowing and neck pain.

Evaluation of less invasive method for saphenous vein harvest in patients with type II diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor for leg wound healing complications after great saphenous vein harvest. Leg healing complications occur in 1-25% of coronary artery bypass graft patients, and are often underestimated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 230 patients enrolled in a prospective trial to evaluate a minimally invasive approach compared with conventional longitudinal harvest were reviewed. Of 100 patients with diabetes, 49 had undergone minimally invasive harvest (group A). Forty-nine patients from the pool without diabetes who underwent minimally invasive harvest were selected using propensity scoring analysis (group B), and 46 diabetic patients operated using a conventional technique (group C) were matched to group A patients. Ninety-five patients with and 49 without diabetes finally entered the study. The quality of leg wound healing was quantified by ASEPSIS score by two independent surgeons in a blinded manner. The occurrence of complications was compared between groups. RESULTS: Fewer leg wound healing complications occurred in diabetic patients in the minimally invasive compared with the conventional group (P < 0.0001). Rates of complications were comparable among diabetic and non-diabetic patients operated using the minimally invasive technique. The intraoperative flow of vein grafts obtained by the minimally invasive technique was comparable to that of veins harvested using the conventional technique. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that postoperative leg wound morbidity can be significantly attenuated by the adoption of a less invasive approach, even in high-risk patients with diabetes. The advantages are not offset by the co-existence of other cardiovascular risk factors or by a long history of diabetes.