Regret after Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Patient Experience.

BACKGROUND: Lasting regret after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a difficult multifaceted clinical scenario with profound effects on individual well-being as well as being a politically charged topic. Currently, there are no professional guidelines or standards of care to help providers and patients navigate this entity. This article summarizes the authors' Transgender Health Program's cohesive multidisciplinary lifespan approach to mitigate, evaluate, and treat any form of temporary or permanent regret after GAS. METHODS: A multidisciplinary (primary care, pediatric endocrinology, psychology, social work, plastic surgery, urology, gynecology, and bioethics) workgroup including cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse professionals met for a duration of 14 months. The incidence of individuals who underwent GAS at the authors' program between 2016 and 2021 and subsequently expressed desire to reverse their gender transition was reported. RESULTS: Among 1989 individuals who underwent GAS, six (0.3%) either requested reversal surgery or transitioned back to their sex assigned at birth. A multidisciplinary assessment and care pathway for patients who request reversal surgery is presented in the article. CONCLUSIONS: A care environment that welcomes and normalizes authentic expression of gender identity, affirms surgical goals without judgment, and destigmatizes the role of mental health in the surgical process are foundational to mitigating the occurrence of any form of regret. The authors hope this can provide a framework to distinguish normal postoperative distress from temporary forms of grief and regret and regret attributable to societal repercussions, surgical outcomes, or gender identity.

A New Virtual Reality: Benefits and Barriers to Providing Pediatric Gender-Affirming Health Care Through Telehealth.

Purpose: Access to early, multidisciplinary, gender-affirming health care significantly improves the psychosocial well-being of transgender and gender diverse youth. The Doernbecher Gender Clinic (DGC) is an interdisciplinary pediatric gender clinic consisting of endocrinology, psychology, and social work. Following the initiation of modified operations in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the DGC converted all interdisciplinary new patient appointments to telehealth. The purpose of this article is to (1) describe the model of care implemented during modified operations, (2) compare the number of new patients seen before and after modified operations, and (3) to contextualize this information with data from a patient satisfaction survey. Method: Retrospective chart review was used to determine how many interdisciplinary new patient appointments occurred before and during modified operations. Additional variables included age, gender, visit modality (phone or video), geographic location, and number of caregivers who participated. In addition, patients and families who attended appointments since modified operations were invited to complete a prospective survey regarding their experience and satisfaction with these appointments, and the narrative responses to questions about advantages and disadvantages were analyzed thematically. Results: Chart review revealed a similar number and make up of new patient appointments before and after the initiation of modified operations. The percentage of patients residing in other urban areas outside of the Portland metro increased over the course of the three time periods, but not to a significant degree. Survey results suggest that both telehealth and in-person visits have advantages and disadvantages with regard to (1) access and (2) comfort. Families appear to differ with regard to their priorities in each area. Conclusion: Telehealth has the potential to provide quality pediatric gender-affirming health care without sacrificing the benefits of an interdisciplinary team-based approach.

Guiding the conversation-types of regret after gender-affirming surgery and their associated etiologies.

BACKGROUND: A rare, but consequential, risk of gender affirming surgery (GAS) is post-operative regret resulting in a request for surgical reversal. Studies on regret and surgical reversal are scarce, and there is no standard terminology regarding either etiology and/or classification of the various forms of regret. This study includes a survey of surgeons' experience with patient regret and requests for reversal surgery, a literature review on the topic of regret, and expert, consensus opinion designed to establish a classification system for the etiology and types of regret experienced by some patients. METHODS: This anonymous survey was sent to the 154 surgeons who registered for the 2016 World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) conference and the 2017 USPATH conference. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A MeSH search of the gender-affirming outcomes literature was performed on PubMed for relevant studies pertaining to regret. Original research and review studies that were thought to discuss regret were included for full text review. RESULTS: The literature is inconsistent regarding etiology and classification of regret following GAS. Of the 154 surgeons queried, 30% responded to our survey. Cumulatively, these respondents treated between 18,125 and 27,325 individuals. Fifty-seven percent of surgeons encountered at least one patient who expressed regret, with a total of 62 patients expressing regret (0.2-0.3%). Etiologies of regret were varied and classified as either: (I) true gender-related regret (42%), (II) social regret (37%), and (III) medical regret (8%). The surgeons' experience with patient regret and request for reversal was consistent with the existing literature. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, regret following GAS was rare and was consistent with the existing literature. Regret can be classified as true gender-related regret, social regret and medical regret resulting from complications, function, pre-intervention decision making. Guidelines in transgender health should offer preventive strategies as well as treatment recommendations, should a patient experience regret. Future studies and scientific discourse are encouraged on this important topic.

What is "Nonbinary" and What Do I Need to Know? A Primer for Surgeons Providing Chest Surgery for Transgender Patients.

BACKGROUND: Most transgender research focuses on patients who identify within the gender binary of either trans-male or trans-female. This largely omits understanding of the "nonbinary" gender identity as it pertains to surgical care. OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe a single-institution experience of chest-affirming procedures performed in nonbinary patients, including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, practice pearls, and outcomes. METHODS: This was an observational study of nonbinary patients who underwent "chest-affirming surgery" from 2012 to 2017. Demographic and surgical data were collected. A postoperative questionnaire assessing quality of life and body image outcomes was administered. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients with gender dysphoria underwent chest surgery; 58 (13%) patients were nonbinary. All nonbinary patients indicated female sex was assigned at their birth (100%). The most commonly performed procedure was the double incision technique with nipple grafts (72%), followed by the double incision technique without nipple grafts (19%). On a Likert scale, patients reported improved quality of life (4.88, SD ± 0.34), comfort with exercise (4.07, SD ± 0.98), sex life (4.02, SD ± 0.92), and comfort with physical appearance with (4.97, SD ± 0.18) and without clothes (4.69, SD ± 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Chest surgery for nonbinary patients comprises a considerable proportion of transgender surgery practice, and surgeons who provide affirming care should be familiar with the unique characteristics and treatment options for this population.