The healthcare utilization and cost of treating patients experiencing inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks: a propensity score study.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate shocks (IASs) from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are associated with decreased quality of life, but whether they increase healthcare utilization and treatment costs is unknown. We sought to determine the impact of IASs on subsequent healthcare utilization and treatment costs. METHODS: We conducted a case-control analysis of ICD patients at a single institution from 1997 to 2010 and who had ≥12 months of post-ICD implant follow-up. Cases included all patients experiencing an IAS during the first 12 months after implantation. Eligible control patients did not receive a shock of any kind during the 12 months after implantation. Propensity scores based on 36 covariates (area under curve = 0.78) were used to match cases to controls. We compared the rate (occurrences/person year [PY]) of healthcare utilization immediately following IAS to the end of the 12-month follow-up period to the rate in the no-shock group over 12 months of follow-up. We also compared 12-month postimplant treatment (outpatient clinic, emergency room, and hospitalization) costs in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients experiencing ≥1 IAS during the first 12 months after implant (contributing 48 PYs) were matched to 76 no-shock patients (contributing 76 PYs). Cardiovascular (CV)-related clinic visit and hospitalization rates were increased following an IAS compared to those not receiving a shock (4.0 vs 3.3 and 0.7 vs 0.5, respectively, P = 0.02 for both). CV-related emergency room visitation (0.15 vs 0.08) rates were also numerically higher following an IAS, but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Patients experiencing an IAS accrued greater treatment costs during the 12 months postimplant compared to no-shock patients ($13,973 ± $46,345 vs $6,790 ± $19,091, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Recipients of IAS utilize the healthcare system more frequently following an IAS than patients not experiencing a shock. This increased utilization results in higher costs of treating IAS patients during the 12 months postimplant.

The prognostic impact of pre-implantation hyponatremia on morbidity and mortality among patients with left ventricular dysfunction and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

AIMS: Hyponatremia is commonly observed among patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and is a marker for adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of pre-implant hyponatremia on the outcomes of death, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular arrhythmias among patients with ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of patients with an ejection fraction ≤40% undergoing ICD implantation (n = 911) for the primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death from 1997 to 2007. The predictive value of the severity of pre-implantation hyponatremia stratified into mild hyponatremia (n = 268, sodium 134-136 mmol/L), moderate hyponatremia (n = 105, sodium 131-133 mmol/L), and severe hyponatremia (n = 31, sodium ≤130 mmol/L) on the risk of death, ADHF, and appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias as compared with patients a normal serum sodium (n = 507, sodium ≥ 137 mmol/L), was calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. During a mean follow-up of 775 ± 750 days as the severity of hyponatremia (from a normal sodium to severe hyponatremia) increased an incremental incidence of death (25% to 61%, P < 0.001) and ADHF (11% to 26%, P = 0.004) was observed with a reduced incidence of ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (37-29%, P = 0.037). Compared with the normal sodium cohort, patients with severe hyponatremia demonstrated an increased risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 2.69 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.57-4.59), P = 0.004] and ADHF [AHR 2.98 (95% CI 1.41-6.30), P = 0.004], with a lower probability of appropriate ICD therapy [AHR 0.68 (95% CI 0.27-0.88), P = 0.031]. CONCLUSION: Hyponatremia is commonly observed among ICD recipients with LV dysfunction. Patients with an increasing severity of hyponatremia are at increased risk of death and HF related morbidity with a reduced incidence of appropriate ICD therapy particularly among patients with severe hyponatremia.

Prognostic impact of thyroid stimulating hormone levels in patients with cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) abnormalities have been associated with various cardiac arrhythmias. Effect of TSH abnormalities on mortality and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) behavior in patients with cardiomyopathy has not been investigated. METHODS: Our ICD database includes 1,445 patients between December 1997 and January 2008. TSH levels using the ultra sensitive assay were available in 371 patients. Patients were classified based on TSH levels as: High TSH (N = 102, TSH > 5) and Low TSH (N = 26, TSH < 0.4). TSH groups were compared for mortality, appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies. RESULTS: A high or low TSH was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: Hazard ratio (HR) 1.46 (95% CI 1.03-2.08), P = 0.033 and HR 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.03), P = 0.043 respectively. TSH abnormalities were not associated with an increased incidence in appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapy. CONCLUSION: A low or high TSH was associated with a higher mortality; however, neither were associated with appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapy after multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association of high TSH and appropriate ICD therapy. However, multivariate analysis did not show this association. Therefore, we are concluding that TSH levels are predictors of all-cause mortality but not ICD therapy.

Physical activity is associated with positive responses during carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt-table test in patients with unexplained syncope.

AIMS: Physical exercise is known to alter the physiological response to orthostatic stress. This study compared reported physical activity levels in patients with unexplained syncope who did or did not demonstrate positive responses to carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt-table testing. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1,336 patients with unexplained syncope who underwent carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt-table testing. Patients with positive responses (cases) were compared with patients with negative responses (controls). Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of positive responses to carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt-table testing. RESULTS: Seventy patients had a positive response to carotid sinus massage and 564 patients had a positive response to head-up tilt-table testing. Physical activity was an independent positive predictor of a positive response to both carotid sinus massage {adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.86, 95% CI (1.14-3.05); p = 0.01} and head-up tilt-table testing {AOR 1.31, 95% CI (1.04-1.65); P = 0.02} even after adjustment for multiple other factors including age, gender, and other medical conditions. CONCLUSION: Physical activity is associated with greater likelihood of positive responses during carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt-table testing.

Evaluation of the Charlson comorbidity index to predict early mortality in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines consider the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) a class III indication in patients with a life expectancy of <1 year. An evaluation of concomitant noncardiac conditions may identify patients whom may not derive benefit with ICD therapy. We sought to evaluate the association of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on the prediction of early mortality (EM), death <1 year after ICD implant. METHODS: The study population consisted of patients (n = 1062) undergoing ICD implantation for the primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death from 1997 to 2007. The predictive value of the CCI on the risk of EM and appropriate shock therapy for ventricular arrhythmias as compared to patients without EM after ICD implant was calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and receiver operator analyses. RESULTS: Patients experiencing EM (n = 110) demonstrated higher CCI scores (mean 2.8 ± 1.3 vs 1.5 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) as compared to individuals without EM (n = 963). Among patients with a CCI of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5, the incidence of EM increased from 5% to 78%. The CCI was an independent predictor of EM (AHR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6], P < 0.001, per single score increase). Patients who experienced EM demonstrated a decreased incidence of appropriate ICD therapy when compared to patients without EM (AHR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2-0.7], P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Noncardiac conditions are commonly observed among patients undergoing ICD implantation. Guidelines must incorporate a comprehensive assessment of concomitant comorbidities to minimize the risk of EM and to maximize the survival benefit with ICD therapy.

Predictors of pacemaker dependence and pacemaker dependence as a predictor of mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence, predictors, and survival for the development of pacemaker dependence (PD) in patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,550 consecutive patients with ICD implantation at a single center from 1996 to 2008 with a mean of 4.2 ± 3.4 years. Patients with implant intrinsic heart rates less than 40 beats/min (n = 48) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (n = 444) were excluded leaving 1,058 patients in this study. PD was defined as an intrinsic rhythm <40 beats/min after inhibiting the pacemaker, <50 beats/min with transient symptoms of dizziness relieved by resumption of pacing and right ventricle pacing despite algorithms to promote intrinsic conduction at the 3 monthly follow-up ICD clinic visits. Multivariate regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 64 ± 13 years; 79% were male with a primary indication for the ICD in 57%. PD occurred in 142 (13.4%) of patients, with a mean time to PD of 2.6 ± 1.9 years. PD was associated with a 48% increased odds for mortality versus non-PD ICD patients during the mean follow-up time of 4.2 ± 3.4 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.48 [95% confidence interval 1.080-2.042]; P = 0.015). Older age, a history of atrial fibrillation, amiodarone use, and secondary prevention were the strongest predictors for the development of PD. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center ICD cohort, the development of PD was not uncommon and was associated with decreased survival.

The gender-paradox among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a propensity-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) clinical trials have demonstrated that while men derived a mortality reduction with prophylactic ICD implantation, women did not. These trials also observed that women receive less appropriate ICD shock therapy compared to men. We aimed to investigate this "gender-paradox" among a heterogeneous community cohort of patients receiving ICDs. METHODS: We identified 1,445 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation from 1997 to 2007. The study population consisted of 582 patients, of whom 291 were women who could be propensity matched to 291 men, based on age, ejection fraction, implantation indication (primary or secondary), etiology of cardiomyopathy (ischemic or nonischemic), and the presence of a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device. The impact of gender difference on the probability of death and appropriate ICD shocks for ventricular arrhythmias was calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 909 ± 901 days, compared to men, women demonstrated a similar risk of death (25% vs 25%, adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.35], P = 0.74). In contrast, women demonstrated a decreased probability of appropriate ICD-shock therapy (14% vs 19%, AHR 0.80 [95% CI 0.59-0.88], P = 0.03) compared to men, and among cohorts with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy (10% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and CRT-D devices (7% vs 19%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among a community cohort with ICDs, women have a similar mortality compared to men while experiencing less appropriate ICD therapy. These results support the findings of a lower arrhythmic mortality among women.

The prognostic impact of shocks for clinical and induced arrhythmias on morbidity and mortality among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Recent investigations have demonstrated that the occurrence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is associated with adverse long-term outcomes. These studies have emphasized that the risk is most reasonably due to arrhythmias rather than to the shock itself. We sought to compare the impact of shock delivery for induced ventricular arrhythmias during implantation defibrillation threshold testing and noninvasive electrophysiology study (NIPS) to clinical shocks on long-term outcomes among patients with ICDs. METHODS: This was a cohort evaluation of 1,372 patients undergoing ICD implantation at a tertiary hospital from December 1997 to January 2007. The probability of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) was evaluated based upon the type of ICD shock received using multivariable Cox proportional analyses. The four shock types analyzed were implantation shocks only (n = 694), additional NIPS shocks only (n = 319), additional appropriate shocks only (n = 128), or additional inappropriate shocks only (n = 104). RESULTS: The risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.20]; P = .491) or ADHF (AHR 0.71 [95% CI 0.46-1.16]; P = .277) were similar between recipients of NIPS shocks and recipients of implantation shocks. Receiving an appropriate ICD shock increased the risk of death (AHR 2.09 [95% CI 1.38-2.69]; P <.001) and ADHF (AHR 2.40 [95% CI 1.51-3.81]; P <.002) as compared with implantation shocks and also increased the risk of death (AHR 2.61 [95% CI 1.86-3.67]; P <.001) and ADHF (AHR 2.29 [95% CI 1.33-3.97]; P = .003) as compared with NIPS shocks. CONCLUSIONS: ICD shocks delivered during induced ventricular arrhythmias at the time of NIPS testing does not increase the risk of death or ADHF as compared with recipients of appropriate ICD shocks. The occurrence of spontaneous arrhythmias in vulnerable substrates may explain the increased risk.

A comparison of outcomes for patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary vs secondary-prevention.

OBJECTIVE: Compare characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary vs secondary cardiac arrest prevention. METHODS: Patients in this cohort study were identified from a prospectively collected ICD database from June 1999 to August 2003 and divided into groups based on whether they received their ICD for primary or secondary-prevention of cardiac arrest. Patient follow-up continued until August of 2006 and the occurrence of appropriate ICD shocks, inappropriate ICD shocks, and mortality were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 437 patients, 80.8% were male, 70.3% had coronary disease, and the mean age was 65.7+/-13.1 years. At baseline, primary-prevention patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), use of a single chamber device and utilization of beta blockers and antiarrhythmics while having a greater use of biventricular pacing as compared to secondary-prevention patients. Over the first 12 months after implantation, the primary-prevention group was 43.0% less likely to receive an appropriate shock for ventricular arrhythmias (P=0.002) and 34.2% less likely to have an appropriate shock over the entire follow-up period (P=0.018). The incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks over the first 12 months after implantation and over the entire follow-up period was similar between groups (P=0.900 and P=0.217, respectively) as was mortality (P=0.228 and P=0.757, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Primary-prevention patients are characteristically different in numerous ways from secondary-prevention patients, but despite having a greater risk of experiencing appropriate shocks, exhibit a similar risk of inappropriate shocks and mortality over an average follow-up time exceeding 41 months.

Association between statin therapy and reductions in atrial fibrillation or flutter and inappropriate shock therapy.

AIMS: In patients without implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), statins have been shown to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/AFL). We sought to determine if statin therapy could reduce the occurrence of AF/AFL with rapid ventricular rates with and without inappropriate shock therapy among a large heterogeneous ICD cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively followed 1445 consecutive patients receiving an ICD for the primary (n = 833) or secondary (n = 612) prevention from December 1997 through January 2007. Outcome measures include incidence of AF/AFL that initiated ICD therapy or was detected during ICD interrogation. Cox hazard regression analyses were conducted to determine the predictors of AF/AFL with and without inappropriate shock delivery and did not include inappropriate shocks resulting from lead dysfunction or other exogenous factors. Patients in this study (n = 1445) were followed over a mean follow-up period of (mean +/- SD) 874 +/- 805 days. There were 563 episodes of AF/AFL detected, with 200 episodes resulting in inappropriate shock therapy. Overall, 745 patients received statin therapy and 700 did not. The use of statin therapy was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.472 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.349-0.638, P < 0.001] for the development of AF/AFL with shock therapy and 0.613 (95% CI, 0.496-0.758, P < 0.001) without shock therapy when compared with the group without statin use. CONCLUSION: Among a cohort with ICDs at high risk for cardiac arrhythmias, statin therapy was associated with a reduction in AF/AFL tachyarrhythmia detection and inappropriate shock therapy.

Association between statin use and mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: A few previous nested cohort trials have evaluated the use of statins on survival and the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF). While the studies generally agreed on the survival effects, they disagreed on the magnitude of the mortality benefit and on the effect on VT/VF. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine in a large, long-term follow-up cohort whether statin therapy could reduce mortality and the occurrence of VT/VF in a mixed population receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary or secondary prevention and either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Cohort evaluation of all patients undergoing implantation of an ICD with a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% at an urban U.S. teaching hospital from December 1997 through January 2007. Multivariable analysis of predictors of mortality and VT/VF were conducted. RESULTS: There were 314 deaths among the 1204 patients (26.1%). The use of statin therapy (n = 642) was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.85; P<.001) for mortality as compared with the no-statin group (n = 562). The use of statin therapy was not associated with a reduction in the adjusted hazard ratio for VT/VF (0.85; 95% CI 0.68-1.06; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy is associated with a reduction in overall mortality in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy with an ICD implanted for either primary or secondary prevention. The magnitude of survival benefit might have been underestimated given our inability to use statin as a time-dependent covariate.

The impact of carvedilol on the defibrillation threshold.

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation threshold (DFT) is the minimum energy required to successfully terminate ventricular fibrillation. Epinephrine has been shown to increase the DFT in the beta-blocker naïve, but using cardioselective beta-blockers leads to a reduction in the DFT on infusion of epinephrine and norepinephrine. We sought to determine the impact of carvedilol therapy on the DFT after infusion of epinephrine and norepinephrine. METHODS: DFT was determined in patients receiving carvedilol by the step-down method (baseline DFT), and then patients (n = 27, 67.3 years, 70.0% were male, average left ventricular ejection fraction = 19%) were randomized to a 7-minute infusion of norepinephrine, epinephrine, or placebo in a double-blind manner. After the study drug infusion, DFT testing was repeated (experimental DFT) and results were compared between groups. RESULTS: No differences in intragroup DFTs were observed among carvedilol-treated patients receiving norepinephrine (9.4 +/- 4.6 J vs 11.1 +/- 7.8 J; P = .589), epinephrine (10.6 +/- 5.3 J vs 9.8 +/- 6.3 J; P = .779), or placebo (11.1 +/- 7.0 vs 8.5 +/- 4.2; P = .349). CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol prevents alterations in DFT produced by stress levels of catecholamines.

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and arrhythmic events in ICD patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the effect of electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the primary therapeutic modality for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. One potential problem with ICDs is interactions with electrical devices and medical procedures causing EMI or triggering arrhythmic events. Endoscopy frequently employs electrocautery (EC) for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Current guidelines advise inactivating ICDs before any surgical procedure. There is limited information on management of ICDs during endoscopy with or without EC. We prospectively evaluated patients with ICDs undergoing endoscopic procedures at our institution. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one ICD patients underwent 52 gastrointestinal endoscopies over 17 months. The mean age of the population was 66 years (51-83). There were 28 men and 13 women. Thirteen patients had single chamber devices, 25 had dual chamber devices, and 2 had biventricular ICDs. The mean tachyarrhythmia detection rate programmed was 164.7 bpm (125-188). Eighteen procedures (43.9%) required biopsy, coagulation, or polypectomy. Of these, 10 (55%) required the use of EC. Only unipolar EC with mean current 19.6 mA was used. All ICDs were programmed to detection-only with therapies off. Sensitivity was left at nominal programmed settings. Post procedure interrogation showed no detection of EMI or tachyarrhythmic events. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows no EMI or arrhythmic events triggered during endoscopic procedures in patients with pectorally implanted transvenous ICDs. Routine practice of programming ICDs off for gastrointestinal procedures may not be necessary. However, larger studies are needed before change in current recommendations.

An evaluation of the impact of oral magnesium lactate on the corrected QT interval of patients receiving sotalol or dofetilide to prevent atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous magnesium reduces the QTc interval of patients receiving ibutilide. Whether oral magnesium can reduce the QTc interval associated with oral sotalol and dofetilide is not known. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of oral magnesium on the QTc interval and whether an inherent intracellular magnesium deficiency exists among patients with arrhythmias. METHODS: Participants receiving sotalol or dofetilide for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias were randomized to receive magnesium l-lactate (504 mg elemental magnesium daily, Niche Pharmaceuticals, Roanoke, TX) or placebo for 48 hours. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained at baseline, 3 hours, and 51 hours after dosing to correspond to the Tmax after oral ingestion. The QTc interval was measured from the ECGs and compared between groups. Intracellular magnesium concentrations were determined by energy-dispersive x-ray analysis at baseline and 51 hours after dosing (Intracellular Diagnostics, Inc., Foster City, CA). RESULTS: The QTc interval reductions from baseline were greater in the magnesium group than placebo at 3 and 51 hours (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001, respectively). Sixty-three percent of patients (regardless of experimental group) had baseline intracellular magnesium concentrations below the normal reference range of 33.9-41.9 mEq/IU, with an average level of 32.6 +/- 2.2 mEq/IU. CONCLUSIONS: Oral magnesium l-lactate raises intracellular magnesium concentrations and lowers the QTc interval of patients receiving sotalol or dofetilide.

The impact of catecholamines on defibrillation threshold in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of physiologic catecholamine concentrations on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators. BACKGROUND: DFT is the minimum energy delivered by an implanted cardioverter defibrillator that successfully converts ventricular fibrillation. DFT testing is performed under conscious sedation. Since activities of daily living enhance sympathetic tone substantially over these nadir levels, it is important to explore the impact of catecholamines on DFT. METHODS: In this double-blind study, we determined DFT by the step-down method. Patients (n = 50) were stratified by beta-blocker use and then randomized to a 7-minute infusion of epinephrine, norepinephrine, or placebo. After study infusion, DFT testing was repeated. Changes in DFT with different study medications were compared. Subgroup analyses of the effects of catecholamines on DFT, based on beta-blocker use, were also performed. RESULTS: Norepinephrine reduced DFT from baseline measurements by 22.6% (P = 0.008). Neither epinephrine nor placebo impacted DFT (P = 0.999, P = 0.317, respectively). In the subgroup analyses, DFT was reduced with norepinephrine regardless of beta-blocker use, while epinephrine reduced DFT among those receiving beta-blockers. No change in DFT was observed in either of the placebo subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of plasma norepinephrine concentrations reduces the DFT, while elevations in epinephrine had no effect. Norepinephrine seems to reduce DFT regardless of beta-blocker therapy but epinephrine's effects are beta-blocker dependent.

The impact of catecholamines in patients with or without beta-blockers on the ventricular fibrillation cycle length and ventricular fibrillation cycle length variability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of epinephrine, norepinephrine, or placebo on the ventricular fibrillation cycle length (VFCL) and the variability of VFCL (cvVFCL) measurements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with or without beta-blockers. METHODS: Forty-three patients scheduled for their 6-week post-ICD placement noninvasive electrophysiologic study were included in the study at the Arrhythmia Procedure Laboratory at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation was approved by the Hartford Hospital Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: After 2 seconds of continuous VF, 7 consecutive VFCLs were measured from the ICD device recording printout using a 0.5 mm scale ruler under magnification at baseline and after the infusion of catecholamines (epinephrine or norepinephrine at 2 mcg/min) or matching placebo at steady state. The average VFCL and the cvVFCL were determined for each study phase. Subgroup analysis based on chronic beta-blocker use was performed. No between-group differences were noted for epinephrine, norepinephrine, or placebo group for baseline (P=0.538) or postinfusion VFCL (P=0.749) or for baseline (P=0.561) or postinfusion cvVFCL (P=0.623) Regardless of catecholamine group randomization, longer pre- and postinfusion VFCL were noted in those receiving beta-blockers (P=0.157, P=0.019) but no differences in cvVFCL were noted (P=0.216, P=0.474) versus those without beta-blockers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Moderately dosed epinephrine or norepinephrine does not affect either VFCL or the variability of VFCL after short duration of ventricular fibrillation. Chronic cardioselective beta-blockade prolongs VFCL without any impact on coefficient of variation of VFCL.

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge following consumption of a dietary weight loss supplement.

This report describes the clinical course of a 40-year-old female who experienced repetitive ICD firing after consuming Metabolife 356, a multicomponent dietary weight loss supplement. Following the initiation of Metabolife 356, the patient experienced four shocks over a 3 day period with two 30 J shocks being delivered sequentially. Interrogation of the device revealed atrial tachycardia with 1:1 AV conduction at a rate of 240 beats/min. Metabolife 356 was discontinued and the dosage of sotalol was increased to 120 mg twice daily without recurrence of ICD discharge.

The effect of head-upright tilt table testing for vasovagal syncope on P-wave duration.

Fluid shifts in vasovagal syncope may be reflected in electrocardiographic P-wave duration. We examined the effect of head-upright tilt-table testing (HUT) on P-wave duration among patients with positive or negative HUT. P-wave duration was measured at baseline and several post-HUT time points. In patients with a positive HUT, the test was immediately discontinued. P-wave duration measurements obtained at the completion of the test or when symptoms occurred were compared to baseline measurements. The P-wave duration among patients with a positive HUT was significantly reduced at the onset of symptoms as compared to baseline (-14.0 ms, P = .0054) and 2-minute tilt measurements (-11.3 ms, P = .0246). P-wave duration measurements were not reduced in patients experiencing a negative HUT at any follow-up time. We showed a significant reduction in P-wave duration among patients experiencing positive HUT that suggests a dynamic relationship between atrial volume and P-wave duration.