Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 38(8): 1459-1466, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cough is one of the most common health issues for which medical attention is sought. A chronic cough (CC) is understood as a cough that lasts longer than 8 weeks. CC encompasses two subsets referred to as refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC). This study aims to assess the current understanding and perceptions of a RCC and UCC, from a physician's perspective in Switzerland and how this understanding and practical work leads to the relevant diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: In October 2020, 549 GPs and 338 pulmonologists in Switzerland, received an invite to participate in the online-based quantitative survey. Data collection was carried out through a 25-minute online survey. The questionnaire was based on structured questions, and conducted on a randomized sample of doctors (general practitioners -GPs and pulmonologists) in the German- and French-speaking part of Switzerland. RESULTS: Overall, 33 pulmonologists and 52 GPs participated in the online survey. Only 39% of GPs, but 73% of pulmonologists, defined chronic cough as a cough lasting 8 weeks or longer. The majority of physicians (72%), especially pulmonologists (88%), perceived a clinical gap regarding the treatment of persistent cough. 74% of the sampled physicians agreed that persistent cough is a high burden of disease for patients. Based on the answers, the annual number of new patients with RCC and UCC in Switzerland is estimated at 9322 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study have highlighted differences in the terminology used to describe CC (RCC and UCC), in the diagnostic tests used and, in the treatments used between GPs and pulmonologists. These findings suggest the need to align the current language regarding the disease to facilitate a standardized approach for diagnosis and treatment and towards improving patient care and reduce burden of disease for CC (RCC and UCC) patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , General Practitioners , Kidney Neoplasms , Chronic Disease , Cough/drug therapy , Cough/therapy , Humans , Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland
2.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(5): 711-722, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35220875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against pneumococcal disease (PD) has shown a favorable cost-effectivenessprofile for many national immunization programs. While vaccination efforts have concentrated on children, many adults with underlying illnesses face elevated risks of PD and death. A 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V114) is currently available offering protection against 15 different serotypes and can be used in adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the cost-effectiveness of V114 vaccination in high-risk adults, aged 18+, in Switzerland. To this end, a Markov model was constructed estimating the lifetime direct medical costs and clinical effectiveness of V114 vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (NBPP). RESULTS: Considering 60% vaccine uptake and direct effects of vaccination, in total 760 IPD and 4,396 NBPP in- and outpatient cases could be prevented. Vaccinating high-risk adults with V114 led to CHF 37.4 million additional vaccination costs but saved CHF 14.4 million of medical treatment costs. V114 vaccination produced a gain of 2,095 QALYs and 6,320 LYs compared with no vaccination, leading to incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of CHF 17,866/QALY and CHF 15,616/QALY gained from a health care payer and societal perspective, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence justifies the implementation of V114 vaccination among high-risk adults in Switzerland.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Pneumococcal Infections , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal , Adult , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Pneumococcal Infections/drug therapy , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/prevention & control , Switzerland/epidemiology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Conjugate/therapeutic use
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(6): e217-e221, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Varicella, caused by the varicella-zoster virus, is a highly contagious infectious disease with substantial health and economic burden to society. Universal varicella vaccination (UVV) is not yet recommended by the Swiss National Immunization Program, which instead recommends catch-up immunization for children, adolescents and adults 11-40 years of age who have no reliable history of varicella or are varicella-zoster virus-IgG seronegative. The objective of this study was to perform an assessment of health impact and cost-effectiveness comparing UVV with current practice and recommendations in Switzerland. METHODS: A dynamic transmission model for varicella was adapted to Switzerland comparing 2 base-case schedules (no infant vaccination and 10% coverage with infant vaccination) to 3 different UVV schedules using quadrivalent (varicella vaccine combined with measles-mumps-rubella) and standalone varicella vaccines administered at different ages. Modeled UVV coverage rates were based on current measles-mumps-rubella coverage of approximately 95% (first dose) and 90% (second dose). Direct medical costs and societal perspectives were considered, with cost and outcomes discounted and calculated over a 50-year time horizon. RESULTS: UVV would reduce the number of varicella cases by 88%-90%, hospitalizations by 62%-69% and deaths by 75%-77%. UVV would increase direct medical costs by Swiss Franc (CHF) 39-49 (US $43-54) per capita and costs from a societal perspective by CHF 32-40 (US $35-44). Incremental quality-adjusted life-years per capita increased by 0.0012-0.0014. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the UVV schedules versus the base-case were CHF 31,194-35,403 (US $34,452-39,100) per quality-adjusted life-year from the direct medical cost perspective and CHF 25,245-29,552 (US $27,881-32,638) from the societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: UVV appears highly effective and cost-effective when compared with current clinical practice and recommendations in Switzerland from both a direct medical costs perspective and societal perspective.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Health Impact Assessment , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology , Immunization Programs , Vaccination/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/transmission , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Switzerland/epidemiology
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 12, 2021 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, several countries have initiated universal varicella vaccination (UVV) programs in infants. In 2019, the Swiss National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) decided to start evaluating the introduction of universal varicella vaccination. There is a theoretical concern that suboptimal vaccination coverage could lead to a shift in the varicella incidence to older age groups, thereby potentially increasing complication rates. To achieve a high vaccination coverage rate, it is important that practicing physicians comply with a potential recommendation for UVV. We studied the perception of varicella and the current vaccination behavior among Swiss pediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) who treat children. We also assessed their intention to advise parents to vaccinate their children against varicella in the event the Swiss NITAG will recommend UVV. METHODS: Primary data was collected through a structured, 20-min online survey with Swiss pediatricians and GPs who treat children. RESULTS: 150 physicians participated in the study: 40 GPs in the German-speaking part, 20 GPs in the French-speaking part, 67 pediatricians in the German-speaking part, and 23 pediatricians in the French-speaking part. The majority (64%) of all participants reported that they currently recommend varicella vaccination for risk groups according to the national immunization plan. About one third of physicians (35%) - predominantly pediatricians - currently already recommend it for all infants. In these situations, a measles, mumps, rubella, varicella combination vaccine is currently used by 58% for the first dose and by 59% for the second dose. 86% of participants stated that they would advise parents to have their children vaccinated against varicella in case of a recommendation for UVV by the Swiss NITAG. 68% responded that they expect many questions from parents and 65% agreed that they have good arguments to convey the importance of varicella vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The survey study results show that most participating pediatricians and GPs indicated a favorable attitude towards childhood vaccination against varicella in the setting of a Swiss NITAG recommendation for UVV. This data shows the importance of NITAG recommendations in influencing vaccine education and supporting achievement of high coverage of varicella vaccination.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Chickenpox/prevention & control , General Practitioners/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology , Pediatricians/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/virology , Chickenpox Vaccine/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Incidence , Male , Parents/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland/epidemiology , Vaccines, Combined/immunology , Vaccines, Combined/therapeutic use
5.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 671, 2020 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32398057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the obligatory aetiological factor for the development of cervical cancer. In Switzerland, the prevention strategy for cervical cancer is based on primary prevention via HPV vaccination and secondary prevention with an opportunistic screening programme for precancerous lesions. Vaccination is recommended to 11-26 years old male and female persons. The objective of the study was to assess the epidemiological impact on cervical cancer of switching from the currently implemented programme with the 4-valent vaccine to the 9-valent vaccine, in an 11-26 years old gender-neutral vaccination programme in Switzerland. METHODS: A previously validated dynamic transmission model of HPV infections was adapted and calibrated to the Swiss setting assuming an 80% coverage rate in HPV-vaccination and lifelong vaccine type-specific protection. A gender-neutral vaccination programme (males and females) for 11-26 years old with a 9-valent HPV vaccine was compared with the current 11-26 years old gender-neutral 4-valent vaccination programme. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to test the impact of lower vaccination coverage rates and a shorter duration of protection on the model outcomes. RESULTS: In Switzerland, a 9-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme would result in an additional prevention of 2979 cervical cancer cases, 13,862 CIN3 and 15,000 CIN2 cases, compared with the 4-valent gender-neutral vaccination programme over 100 years. These additional disease cases avoided would correspond to a 24, 36 and 48% cumulative incidence decrease in cervical cancer, CIN3 and CIN2 cases, respectively. It would also prevent additional 741 cervical cancer-related deaths over 100 years. A substantial additional reduction in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions burden is still observed when varying the vaccination coverage rate from 30 to 60% or reducing the duration of protection from lifelong to 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to the 9-valent vaccine in Switzerland to prevent cervical diseases showed an important contribution in terms of public health impact compared with the 4-valent vaccine in an 11-26 years old gender-neutral population, even with very conservative assumptions such as low coverage rates or low duration of protection and limiting analysis to only cervical disease.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Switzerland/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology
6.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 149: w20170, 2019 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880807

ABSTRACT

AIM: The study aim was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy compared with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumour proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, from a Swiss payer perspective. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab for this indication has not previously been evaluated in Switzerland. METHODS: We conducted an analysis using a partitioned survival model with a cycle length of one week, base-case time horizon of 20 years and discount rate of 3% for cost and health outcomes. KEYNOTE-024 randomised controlled trial data for pembrolizumab monotherapy compared with chemotherapy was used as a basis for projecting time-on-treatment, progression-free survival and overall survival, over a 20-year period. For overall survival and progression-free survival, we used Kaplan-Meier probabilities for a brief initial period of the model, followed by parametric curves that had the best fit with subsequent trial data. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on the EuroQol 5-dimensional 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire administered to trial patients. Costs (in CHF, year 2018) of drug acquisition/administration, adverse events and disease management were included. RESULTS: For the base-case, pembrolizumab monotherapy resulted in mean incremental costs of CHF 77,060 (pembrolizumab CHF 223,324, chemotherapy CHF 146,264) and mean incremental QALYs of 1.34 (pembrolizumab 3.05, chemotherapy 1.71), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 57,402 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness results were most sensitive to overall survival and relatively insensitive to other parameters varied. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab, with an assumption of a willingness-to-pay threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY gained, was 88%. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab is likely to be cost effective for treating Swiss patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC expressing PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. (This economic evaluation was based on the KEYNOTE-024 trial. The trial identifier is NCT02142738.).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Switzerland
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...