A prospective humoral immune monitoring study of kidney transplant recipients receiving three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), like other solid organ transplant recipients display a suboptimal response to mRNA vaccines, with only about half achieving seroconversion after two doses. However, the effectiveness of a booster dose, particularly in generating neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), remains poorly understood, as most studies have mainly focused on non-neutralizing antibodies. Here, we have longitudinally assessed the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in 40 KTRs over a year, examining changes in both anti-spike IgG and NAbs following a booster dose administered about 5 months post-second dose. We found a significant humoral response increase 5 months post-booster, a stark contrast to the attenuated response observed after the second dose. Of note, nearly a quarter of participants did not achieve protective plasma levels even after the booster dose. We also found that the higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated with a more robust humoral response postvaccination. Altogether, these findings underscore the effectiveness of the booster dose in enhancing durable humoral immunity in KTRs, as evidenced by the protective level of NAbs found in 65% of the patients 5 months post- booster, especially those with higher eGFR rates.

Ultrasonographic Intraparenchymal Renal Resistive Index Variation for Assessing Renal Functional Reserve in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a common complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Preoperative renal functional reserve (RFR) has been demonstrated to be highly predictive of CSA-AKI. We have previously demonstrated that intraparenchymal renal resistive index variation (IRRIV) measured by ultrasound (US) can identify the presence of RFR in healthy individuals. This study aimed (1) to examine the correlation between the US IRRIV test and RFR measured through the protein loading test in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and (2) to determine the value of the 2 methods for predicting occurrence of AKI or subclinical AKI after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were enrolled for this pilot study. The protein loading test and the IRRIV test were performed in all patients 2 days before cardiac surgery. Correlation between IRRIV and RFR was tested using Pearson correlation analysis. Association between presence of RFR and positive IRRIV test, presence of RFR and AKI and subclinical AKI, and positive IRRIV test and AKI and subclinical AKI was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the values of IRRIV for predicting RFR, RFR for predicting AKI and subclinical AKI, and IRRIV for predicting AKI and subclinical AKI. RESULTS: Among the 31 patients enrolled, significant association was found between IRRIV and RFR (r = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.63-0.90; p < 0.01). The association between RFR and IRRIV was described in 27/31 (87.1%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the IRRIV test were 100, 84, 60, and 100%, respectively. In ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.96). After cardiac surgery, 1/31 (3.2%) patient had AKI and 12/31 (38.7%) had subclinical AKI. RFR predicted subclinical AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98; p = 0.02). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the RFR were 61, 88.8, 80, and 76%, respectively; the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.59-0.91). IRRIV predicts subclinical AKI (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.93; p = 0.005). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the IRRIV test were 46.1, 100, 100, and 72%, respectively; the AUC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.87). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that a positive IRRIV test can significantly predict the presence of RFR in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. RFR measured by the protein loading test or by the US IRRIV test can predict the occurrence of subclinical postoperative AKI. The findings of this study need to be confirmed in large patient cohorts.

A call to action to evaluate renal functional reserve in patients with COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses an unprecedented challenge to world health systems, substantially increasing hospitalization and mortality rates in all affected countries. Being primarily a respiratory disease, COVID-19 is mainly associated with pneumonia or minor upper respiratory tract symptoms; however, different organs can sustain considerable (if not terminal) damage because of coronavirus. Acute kidney injury is the most common complication of COVID-19-related pneumonia, and more than 20% of patients requiring ventilatory support develop renal failure. Additionally, chronic kidney disease is a major risk factor for COVID-19 severity and mortality. All these data demonstrate the relevance of renal function assessment in patients with COVID-19 and the need of early kidney-directed diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. However, the sole assessment of renal function could be not entirely indicative of kidney tissue status. In this viewpoint, we discuss the clinical significance and potential relevance of renal functional reserve evaluation in patients with COVID-19.

Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction.

New biomarkers of early and late graft dysfunction are needed in renal transplant to improve management of complications and prolong graft survival. A wide range of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, measured in different biological fluids (serum, plasma, urine) and in renal tissues, have been proposed for post-transplant delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). This review investigates old and new potential biomarkers for each of these clinical domains, seeking to underline their limits and strengths. OMICs technology has allowed identifying many candidate biomarkers, providing diagnostic and prognostic information at very early stages of pathological processes, such as AR. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are further promising tools. Although most of these biomarkers still need to be validated in multiple independent cohorts and standardized, they are paving the way for substantial advances, such as the possibility of accurately predicting risk of DGF before graft is implanted, of making a "molecular" diagnosis of subclinical rejection even before histological lesions develop, or of dissecting etiology of CAD. Identification of "immunoquiescent" or even tolerant patients to guide minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is another area of active research. The parallel progress in imaging techniques, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence (AI) is helping to fully exploit the wealth of information provided by biomarkers, leading to improved disease nosology of old entities such as transplant glomerulopathy. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether introduction of these new sets of biomarkers into clinical practice could actually reduce the need for renal biopsy, integrate traditional tools, and ultimately improve graft survival compared to current management.

"War to the knife" against thromboinflammation to protect endothelial function of COVID-19 patients.

In this viewpoint, we summarize the relevance of thromboinflammation in COVID-19 and discuss potential mechanisms of endothelial injury as a key point for the development of lung and distant organ dysfunction, with a focus on direct viral infection and cytokine-mediated injury. Entanglement between inflammation and coagulation and resistance to heparin provide a rationale to consider other therapeutic approaches in order to preserve endothelial function and limit microthrombosis, especially in severe forms. These strategies include nebulized heparin, N-acetylcysteine, plasma exchange and/or fresh frozen plasma, plasma derivatives to increase the level of endogenous anticoagulants (tissue factor pathway inhibitor, activated protein C, thrombomodulin, antithrombin), dipyridamole, complement blockers, different types of stem cells, and extracellular vesicles. An integrated therapy including these drugs has the potential to improve outcomes in COVID-19.

Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Cellular Crosstalk Between Immune System and Kidney Graft.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are known immune-modulators exerting a critical role in kidney transplantation (KT). EV bioactive cargo includes graft antigens, costimulatory/inhibitory molecules, cytokines, growth factors, and functional microRNAs (miRNAs) that may modulate expression of recipient cell genes. As paracrine factors, neutrophil- and macrophage-derived EVs exert immunosuppressive and immune-stimulating effects on dendritic cells, respectively. Dendritic cell-derived EVs mediate alloantigen spreading and modulate antigen presentation to T lymphocytes. At systemic level, EVs exert pleiotropic effects on complement and coagulation. Depending on their biogenesis, they can amplify complement activation or shed complement inhibitors and prevent cell lysis. Likewise, endothelial- and platelet-derived EVs can exert procoagulant/prothrombotic effects and also promote endothelial survival and angiogenesis after ischemic injury. Kidney endothelial- and tubular-derived EVs play a key role in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and during the healing process; additionally, they can trigger rejection by inducing both alloimmune and autoimmune responses. Endothelial EVs have procoagulant/pro-inflammatory effects and can release sequestered self-antigens, generating a tissue-specific autoimmunity. Renal tubule-derived EVs shuttle pro-fibrotic mediators (TGF-ß and miR-21) to interstitial fibroblasts and modulate neutrophil and T-lymphocyte influx. These processes can lead to peritubular capillary rarefaction and interstitial fibrosis-tubular atrophy. Different EVs, including those from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), have been employed as a therapeutic tool in experimental models of rejection and IRI. These particles protect tubular and endothelial cells (by inhibition of apoptosis and inflammation-fibrogenesis or by inducing autophagy) and stimulate tissue regeneration (by triggering angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and migration). Finally, urinary and serum EVs represent potential biomarkers for delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection. In conclusion, EVs sustain an intricate crosstalk between graft tissue and innate/adaptive immune systems. EVs play a major role in allorecognition, IRI, autoimmunity, and alloimmunity and are promising as biomarkers and therapeutic tools in KT.

Subclinical Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Computed Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: The nephrotoxicity of modern contrast media remains controversial. Novel biomarkers of kidney damage may help in identifying a subclinical structural renal injury not revealed by widely used markers of kidney function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate clinical (contrast-induced acute kidney injury [CI-AKI]) and subclinical CI-AKI (SCI-AKI) after intra-arterial administration of Iodixanol and Iopamidol in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2. METHODS: This is a prospective observational monocentric study. Urinary sample was collected at 4-8 h after contrast medium exposure to measure neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and the product tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 ([TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7]), while blood samples were collected at 24 and 48 h after exposure to measure serum creatinine. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled, of whom 53 were exposed to Iodixanol and 47 to Iopamidol. Patients in Iodixanol and Iopamidol groups were comparable in terms of demographics, pre-procedural and procedural data. No patient developed CI-AKI according KDIGO criteria, while 13 patients reported SCI-AKI after exposure to iodine-based medium contrast (3 patients in Iodixanol group and 10 patients in Iopamidol group), defined by positive results of NGAL and/or [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7]. A positive correlation was found between NGAL and [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] in the analysed population (Spearman's rho 0.49, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, Iopamidol exposure showed higher risk for SCI-AKI compared to Iodixanol (OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.16-17.52], p = 0.030), even after controlling for eGFR and volume of contrast medium used. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that intra-arterial modern contrast media administration may have a nephrotoxic effect in a population without pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Further investigations on larger scale are warranted to confirm if Iopamidol exposed patients to increased risk of SCI-AKI compared to Iodixanol.

[What if it is not an acute pyelonephritis? A monocentric experience of renal infarcts]. / Quando non è una pielonefrite acuta: esperienza monocentrica di infarti renali.

BACKGROUND: Often the reduced contrast enhancement on CT renal imaging is radiologically interpreted as acute pyelonephritis (PNA), but it is the task of the clinician to assess a possible differential diagnosis such as a renal infarct and look for a cause. METHODS: In our experience (2010-2013), we hospitalized 51 patients with radiological imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis in native kidneys. However, three of these cases result, after a second look, to be ischemic lesions, only sometimes complicated by over-infections (Tabella 1). FIRST CASE: a woman hospitalized for fever and flank pain with blood culture positive for Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Antibiotic therapy allowed a clinical-laboratory improvement, but after 45 days persisted a focal wedge to the CT scan. The labs showed a anemia due to a sickle cell disease (SLC). The overview was finally interpreted as a renal infarct secondary to a sickle cell anemia, initially complicated by over-infection. SECOND CASE: a men hospitalized for a acute flank pain. The CT scan showed a left renal infarct and a partial renal artery thrombosis, resulting in abuse of cannabinoids and LAC positivity.Third case: a woman hospitalized for flank pain and slight movement of inflammatory markers. CT showed a cuneiform area in the right kidney not vascularized, that did not resolved after prolonged antibiotic therapy. The labs evidence a heterozygous mutation of prothrombin and MTHFR causing the renal infarction. CONCLUSIONS: 6% of radiographic imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis concealed an underlying infarct, due to a unknown state of thrombophilia. The presence of hypovascular imaging to the TC scan, therefore, requires a differential diagnosis between PNA and infarct, especially in the case of atypical development.

PEComa of soft tissues can mimic lymph node relapse in patients with history of testicular seminoma.

Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumour (PEComa) is rare. We describe a 39-year-old man who underwent a left radical orchidectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy for a stage IA classical testicular seminoma. He was diagnosed with a mass lateral to the right common iliac artery that was considered suspicious for late lymph node relapse after 3 years of follow-up. Due to the unusual location of the mass and the equivocal findings of percutaneous biopsy, a laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed. Final pathology revealed PEComa of soft tissue. The patient is disease-free after 38 months of follow-up without adjuvant treatment. The presence of rare soft-tissue neoplasm should be considered in differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses during follow-up of germ cell tumours. Suspicious isolated recurrences of these neoplasms in unusual locations can require surgical excision to confirm diagnosis and avoid inappropriate treatment.