The impact of hindsight bias on the diagnosis of perioperative events by anesthesia providers: A multicenter randomized crossover study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hindsight bias is the tendency to overestimate the predictability of an event after it has already occurred. We aimed to evaluate whether hindsight bias influences the retrospective interpretation of clinical scenarios in the field of anesthesiology, which relies on clinicians making rapid decisions in the setting of perioperative adverse events. DESIGN: Two clinical scenarios were developed (intraoperative hypotension and intraoperative hypoxia) with 3 potential diagnoses for each. Participants completed a crossover study reviewing one case without being informed of the supposed ultimate diagnosis (i.e., no 'anchor' diagnosis), referred to as their foresight case, and the other as a hindsight case wherein they were informed in the leading sentence of the scenario that 1 of the 3 conditions provided was the ultimate diagnosis (i.e., the diagnosis the participant might 'anchor' to if given this information at the start). Participants were randomly assigned to (1) which scenario (hypotension or hypoxia) was presented as the initial foresight case and (2) which of the 3 potential diagnoses for the second case (the hindsight case, which defaulted to whichever case the participant was not assigned for the first case) was presented as the ultimate diagnosis in the leading sentence in a 2 (scenario order) x 3 (hindsight case anchor) between-subjects factorial design (6 possible randomization assignments). SETTING: Two academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Faculty, fellow, and resident anesthesiologists and certified nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: After reading each clinical scenario, participants were asked to rate the probability (%) of each of three potential diagnoses to have caused the hypotension or hypoxia. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) was used to compare whether diagnosis probabilities differ between the hindsight and the foresight case. MAIN RESULTS: 113 participants completed the study. 59 participants (52%) were resident anesthesiologists. Participants randomized to the hypotension scenario as a hindsight case were 2.82 times more likely to assign higher probability to the pulmonary embolus diagnosis if provided as an anchor (95% CI, 1.35-5.90; P = 0.006) and twice as likely to assign higher probability to the myocardial infarction diagnosis if provided as an anchor (95% CI, 1.12-3.58; P = 0.020). Participants randomized to the hypoxia scenario as a hindsight case were 1.78 times more likely to assign higher probability to the mainstem bronchus intubation diagnosis if provided in the anchor statement (95% CI, 1.00-3.14; P = 0.048) and 3.72 times more likely to assign higher probability to the pulmonary edema diagnosis if provided as an anchor (95% CI, 1.88-7.35; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hindsight bias influences the clinical diagnosis probabilities assigned by anesthesia providers. Clinicians should be educated on hindsight bias in perioperative medicine and be cognizant of the effect of hindsight bias when interpreting clinical outcomes.

The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2022.

This special article is the 15th in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief Dr. Kaplan and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series, namely the research highlights of the past year in the specialties of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiology. The major themes selected for 2022 are outlined in this introduction, and each highlight is reviewed in detail in the main body of the article. The literature highlights, in the specialties for 2022, begin with an update on COVID-19 therapies, with a focus on the temporal updates in a wide range of therapies, progressing from medical to the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and, ultimately, with lung transplantation in this high-risk group. The second major theme is focused on medical cardiology, with the authors discussing new insights into the life cycle of coronary disease, heart failure treatments, and outcomes related to novel statin therapy. The third theme is focused on mechanical circulatory support, with discussions focusing on both right-sided and left-sided temporary support outcomes and the optimal timing of deployment. The fourth and final theme is an update on cardiac surgery, with a discussion of the diverse aspects of concomitant valvular surgery and the optimal approach to procedural treatment for coronary artery disease. The themes selected for this 15th special article are only a few of the diverse advances in the specialties during 2022. These highlights will inform the reader of key updates on a variety of topics, leading to the improvement of perioperative outcomes for patients with cardiothoracic and vascular disease.

Use of Serratus Anterior Plane and Transversus Thoracis Plane Blocks for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (S-ICD) Implantation Decreases Intraoperative Opioid Requirements.

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated whether regional anesthetic techniques, especially truncal blocks, can provide adjunct anesthesia without the additional risk of general anesthesia and neuraxial techniques for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Holding area and operating room at a single-center tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 22 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 or 4 patients with severe cardiac disease undergoing S-ICD implantation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either a combination of serratus anterior plane block and transversus thoracis plane block or surgical infiltration of local anesthetics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perioperative analgesic medication in the fascial plane block group versus the surgical wound infiltration group, visual analog pain scale score (0-10), intraoperative vital signs, total procedure time, and length of stay in the intensive care unit were measured. Total intraoperative fentanyl requirements (µg) were significantly less in the truncal block group versus the surgical infiltration group (45 [25-50] v 90 [50-100]; p = 0.026), and no patients had any adverse sequelae related to the study. Median intraoperative propofol use in the surgical infiltration group was 66.48 (47.30-73.73) µg/kg/min, and 65.95 (51.86-104.86) µg/kg/min for the truncal block group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.293). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both the serratus anterior plane block and transversus thoracis plane blocks for S-ICD implantation are appropriate and may have the benefit of decreasing intraoperative opioid requirements.

Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers.

The operating room (OR) is a busy environment with multiple opportunities for distraction. A well-trained anesthesiologist or certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) should remain focused on providing excellent patient care despite these potential distractions. The purpose of this narrative review is to present the multiple types of OR distractions and evaluate each for their level of distraction and their likely impact on patient safety. Distractions in the OR are common and numerous types of distractions exist. Loud OR background noise can lead to miscommunication within the OR team. In several studies, OR noise has been shown to decrease vigilance and possibly delay recognition of non-routine events. The most commonly observed distracting events are "small talk" and staff entering and exiting the OR and most intense distracting events are faulty or unavailable equipment. Phone and pager use can be particularly distracting. Self-initiated distractions can be seen as unprofessional and can negatively impact patient safety. The impact of OR distractions on patient outcomes deserves more vigorous investigation. We must provide anesthesia trainees with the skills to remain vigilant despite numerous and varied OR distractions while also attempting to reduce such OR distractions to improve patient safety. Further research is needed to inform the institution of policies to lessen unnecessary OR distractions.

The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2019.

This highlights in our specialty for 2019 begin with the ongoing major developments in transcatheter valve interventions. Thereafter, the advances in left ventricular assist devices are reviewed. The recent focus on conduit selection and robotic options in coronary artery bypass surgery are then explored. Finally, this special articles closes with a discussion of pulmonary hypertension in noncardiac surgery, anesthetic technique in cardiac surgery, as well as postoperative pneumonia and its outcome consequences.

The Evolution of Breast Implant Infections: Serratia marcescens Is an Emerging Pathogen in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

The flora of implant-based breast infections has changed over the last decade, including at our institution. A 10-year retrospective chart review was performed on 561 implant-based breast reconstructions in 378 patients performed by a single surgeon in an academic university hospital setting. Thirty-two breast infections requiring explantation of the implants occurred during those 10 years. During that time frame, a new pre- and peri-operative protocol was implemented in an effort to diminish infections. We believe that this protocol played a major role in the evolution of changing breast periprosthetic infection flora, from nearly one-third being gram-negative infections to 100% being gram-negative infections. Gram-negative antibiotic coverage should be considered in light of these evolving trends to prevent infections particularly with Serratia marcescens. This may be especially important in patients with BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. Diabetic patients are more likely to develop Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and preoperative MRSA decolonization is essential in these patients. Many patients have late-onset breast periprosthetic infection, the majority of which occurred after 30 days. Regular follow-up and patient education is important to provide timely treatment.

La flore des infections mammaires par implant s'est modifiée depuis dix ans, y compris dans l'établissement des auteurs. Dans un hôpital universitaire, un chirurgien a procédé à une analyse rétrospective sur dix ans des dossiers de 561 reconstructions mammaires par implant réalisées chez 378 patientes. Pendant ces dix ans, 32 infections mammaires ont entraîné l'explantation des implants. Un nouveau protocole préopératoire et périopératoire a été adopté au cours de cette période, afin de réduire les infections. Les auteurs sont d'avis que ce protocole a joué un rôle majeur dans l'évolution de la flore des infections mammaires périprothétiques, qui sont passées de près du tiers à 100 % d'infections à Gram négatif. Il faudrait examiner la couverture antibiotique de ces infections à la lumière de ces tendances afin de prévenir les infections, notamment celles à Serratia marcescens. Cette décision serait particulièrement importante pour les patientes présentant des mutations BRCA1/2 ou ATM. Les patientes diabétiques sont plus susceptibles de contracter des infections à Staphylococcus aureus résistantes à la méthicilline (SARM); la décolonisation préopératoire à SARM est essentielle dans ce cas. De nombreuses patientes ont souffert d'une infection mammaire périprothétique tardive, dont la majorité s'est déclarée plus de 30 jours après l'implant. Il est important d'assurer un suivi régulier et d'éduquer les patientes pour pouvoir leur offrir un traitement au moment opportun.

Evaluating a Variable Porosity Wound Dressing With Anti-Scar Properties in a Porcine Model of Wound Healing.

Introduction: New treatments that promote wound healing while preventing scar formation are needed. One option in topical wound healing is the use of temporary dressings that allow the natural healing process with minimal scar formation. Methods: We evaluated the temporary wound dressings PermeaDerm C, and a PermeaDerm C derivative coated with the anti-scarring agent, salinomycin (PermeaDerm D) in a pig model of wound healing to show the efficacy of these wound dressings in vivo. Results: Porcine fibroblasts grow well in the presence of PermeaDerm C or PermeaDerm A, and salinomycin reduces excessive myofibroblast formation in porcine fibroblasts in vitro. In vivo, wounds treated with PermeaDerm C and PermeaDerm A did not show abnormal or unwanted healing patterns up to 8 weeks post-wound formation. Wounds covered with either PermeaDerm C or PermeaDerm A showed a more mature wound-healing phenotype than the control wounds. Conclusions: PermeaDerm C and PermeaDerm A allowed wound healing, revealing the potential of both PermeaDerm C and PermeaDerm A to promote effective healing while preventing excessive scar formation.