ABSTRACT
Anaerobic digestion is a significant process leading to biogas production and waste management. Despite this double interest, professionals still face a lack of efficient tools to monitor and manage the whole procedure. This is especially true for rheological properties of the material inside the reactor, which are of major importance for anaerobic digestion management. However, rheological properties can hardly be determined in-situ and it would be very helpful to determine indicators of their evolution. To solve this problem, this paper investigates the evolution of sewage sludge rheological and electrical properties during the anaerobic digestion in a batch reactor. We especially focus on apparent viscosity and complex impedance, measured by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Both of them can be modelled by a linear combination of raw sludge and inoculum properties, weighted by time-dependent coefficients. Thus, by determining digested sludge electrical signature, it is possible to obtain those coefficients and model sludge apparent viscosity. This work offers many theoretical and practical prospects.
Subject(s)
Bacteria, Anaerobic/metabolism , Bioreactors , Models, Chemical , Rheology/methods , Sewage/chemistry , Waste Management/methods , Electrochemical Techniques , Sewage/microbiology , ViscosityABSTRACT
Different treatment routes have been studied for a mixed sludge: the conventional agricultural use is compared with the thermal oxidation processes, including incineration (in gaseous phase) and wet air oxidation (in liquid phase). The interest of a sludge digestion prior to the final treatment has been also considered according to the two major criteria, which are the fossil energy utilisation and the greenhouse effect gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) release. Thermal energy has to be recovered on thermal processes to make these processes environmentally friendly, otherwise their main interest is to extract or destroy micropollutants and pathogens from the carbon cycle. In case of continuous energy recovery, incineration can produce more energy than it consumes. Digestion is especially interesting for agriculture: according to these two schemes, the energy final balance can also be in excess. As to wet air oxidation, it is probably one of the best ways to minimize greenhouse effect gases emission.
Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Greenhouse Effect , Minerals , Sewage/chemistry , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Agriculture , Bacteria, Anaerobic , Bioreactors , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Fossil Fuels , Heating , Incineration , Methane/analysis , Nitrogen Oxides/analysis , Oxidation-Reduction , Oxygen/isolation & purification , Sewage/microbiology , Waste Disposal, Fluid/economics , Waste Disposal, Fluid/instrumentation , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methodsABSTRACT
Incineration of sludge is occasionally accused of pollution. This paper shows that if it is correctly designed and implemented, it can be environmentally friendly. For this purpose, sludge incineration is compared to agricultural spreading of limed sludge with respect to toxicity criteria, greenhouse effect gases (GEG) release, energy wasting and other environmental parameters. Landfilling is also considered but as a standby route. Since present regulations on agricultural use and gas emission release from incinerators are stringent, incineration cannot be suspected to release more noxious substances in the environment than agriculture. A distinction is made between biogenic CO2 and fossil CO2. Nevertheless case studies show that incineration produces more GEG and wastes more energy than agricultural spreading if no energy is recovered from hot flue gas. In the case of thermal power or electrical power generation, the environmental balance becomes dramatically more favorable for incineration.
