Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Vet Ther ; 9(2): 128-40, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18597251

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative cost-effectiveness of florfenicol with that of tulathromycin for treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF that receive metaphylactic tulathromycin on arrival at the feedlot. Calves that received therapeutic florfenicol had lower overall mortality (P=.045) and bovine respiratory disease mortality (P=.050) compared with calves that received therapeutic tulathromycin, but no significant differences were detected in feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, or other animal health variables. There was a net advantage of Can$41.19/treated animal in the florfenicol group versus the tulathromycin group. This study demonstrates that it is more cost-effective to use florfenicol than tulathromycin for the initial treatment of UF in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF that receive on-arrival metaphylactic tulathromycin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/mortality , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/mortality , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disaccharides/economics , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/mortality , Fever/veterinary , Heterocyclic Compounds/economics , Thiamphenicol/economics , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
2.
Can Vet J ; 49(5): 463-72, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18512457

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare 2 vaccination programs in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing undifferentiated fever (UF)/bovine respiratory disease (BRD). At feedlot arrival, 3882 calves were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to 2 groups, which were housed by group in 12 pens. At the time of allocation, 1 group (MLV3-BT2) received a multivalent, modified-live viral vaccine containing infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBRV) and types I and II bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), as well as a Mannheimia haemolytica (MH) and Pasteurella multocida bacterin-toxoid. The other group (MLV4-BT1) received a vaccine containing IIBRV, type I BVDV, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza-3 virus, as well as a MH bacterin-toxoid. At an average of 69 days post arrival, the groups received their respective viral vaccines. The initial UF treatment, overall chronicity, overall wastage, overall mortality, and BRD mortality rates were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the MLV3-BT2 group than in the MLV4-BT1 group. Average daily gain and the proportions of yield grade Canada 3 and quality grade E carcasses were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the MLV3-BT2 group than in the MLV4-BT1 group. No significant (P > or = 0.05) difference in the dry matter intake to gain ratio was detected between the 2 groups. In economic terms, there was a net advantage of $20.86 CDN/animal in the MLV3-BT2 group. This study demonstrates that it is more cost effective to use an MLV3-BT2 vaccination program than a MLV4-BT1 vaccination program in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF/BRD.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle/growth & development , Vaccination/veterinary , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Body Composition , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/immunology , Mannheimia haemolytica/immunology , Parainfluenza Virus 3, Bovine/immunology , Pasteurella multocida/immunology , Random Allocation , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Bovine/immunology , Risk Factors , Vaccines, Combined , Weight Gain
3.
Can Vet J ; 49(5): 473-81, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18512458

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to describe the microbiologic agents and pathologic processes in fatal bovine respiratory disease (BRD) of feedlot cattle and to investigate associations between agents and pathologic processes. Ninety feedlot calves diagnosed at necropsy with BRD and 9 control calves without BRD were examined, using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and histopathologic studies. Mannheimia haemolytica (MH) (peracute, acute, and subacute cases) and Mycoplasma bovis (MB) (subacute, bronchiolar, and chronic cases) were the most common agents identified in fatal BRD cases. Significant associations (P < 0.10) were detected between microbiologic agents and between agents and pathologic processes. When IHC staining was used, 25/26 (96%) of animals that were positive for bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) were also positive for MH; 12/15 (80 %) of animals that were positive for Histophilus somni (HS) were also positive for MB; and all of the animals that were positive for HS were negative for MH and BVDV. This quantitative pathological study demonstrates that several etiologic agents and pathologic processes are involved in fatal BRD of feedlot cattle.


Subject(s)
Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/microbiology , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/pathology , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/isolation & purification , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma bovis/isolation & purification , Pasteurellaceae/isolation & purification , Animals , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/mortality , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/virology , Canada , Cattle , Female , Immunohistochemistry/veterinary , Male
4.
Can Vet J ; 49(3): 253-60, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18390097

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infections (unapparent acute infections and persistent infections) on the overall health and performance of feedlot cattle. Calves from 25 pens (7132 calves) were enrolled in the study. Overall and infectious disease mortality rates were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in pens categorized at arrival as positive for type I BVDV and lower in pens that were positive for type II BVDV than in negative pens. Mortality attributed to BVDV infection or enteritis was significantly more common (P < 0.05) in the pens containing persistently infected (PI) calves than in pens not containing PI calves (non-PI pens). There were no statistically detectable (P > or = 0.05) differences in morbidity, overall mortality, average daily gain, or the dry matter intake to gain ratio between PI and non-PI pens. Although type-I BVDV infections in feedlots appear to contribute to higher mortality rates, the presence of PI calves alone does not appear to have a strong impact on pen-level animal health and feedlot performance.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease , Diarrhea Virus 1, Bovine Viral/pathogenicity , Diarrhea Virus 2, Bovine Viral/pathogenicity , Housing, Animal , Weight Gain , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/complications , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/mortality , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/pathology , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/transmission , Cattle , Chronic Disease , Energy Intake , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Morbidity , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Virulence
5.
Vet Ther ; 8(3): 183-200, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17926304

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of tulathromycin (DRAX) versus tilmicosin (MIC) or oxytetracycline (TET) as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves. Calves that received DRAX had significantly (P<.05) lower initial undifferentiated fever (UF) treatment and relapse rates; lower overall chronicity, overall mortality, and cause-specific mortality rates; higher average daily gains; and improved quality grades. However, calves that received DRAX also had poorer (P<.05) yield grades compared with calves that received MIC or TET and worse feed conversion compared with calves that received MIC. Net advantages in the DRAX group were 3.79CanDollars/animal and 16.96CanDollars/animal compared with the MIC and TET groups, respectively. Based on these results, DRAX is a more efficacious and cost-effective metaphylactic antimicrobial than MIC or TET in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF. In addition, this study presents a comparison between two methods ("deads out" and "deads in") of calculating feedlot performance variables.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle/growth & development , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Fever/veterinary , Heterocyclic Compounds/pharmacology , Weight Gain , Animal Feed/economics , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Canada , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disaccharides/economics , Eating/drug effects , Female , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/prevention & control , Heterocyclic Compounds/economics , Macrolides , Meat/standards , Oxytetracycline , Random Allocation , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives
6.
Can Vet J ; 48(6): 600-6, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17616056

ABSTRACT

A field trial was performed under commercial feedlot conditions in central Nebraska to assess the relative efficacy of tulathromycin (TULA) to florfenicol (FLOR) for the treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in feedlot calves that did not receive a metaphylactic antimicrobial or vaccines/bacterins containing Mannheimia haemolytica or Histophilus somni at feedlot arrival by comparing animal health, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristic variables. Two hundred recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred beef calves that met the study-specific case definition of UF were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 experimental groups as follows: TULA, which received tulathromycin administered subcutaneously at the rate of 2.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) once at the time of allocation; or FLOR, which received florfenicol administered subcutaneously at the rate of 40 mg/kg BW once at the time of allocation. In terms of animal health, the first UF relapse (RR = 0.65), overall mortality (RR = 0.33), and BRD mortality (RR = 0.29) rates in the TULA group were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the FLOR group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences between the TULA and FLOR groups for the other animal health variables measured. There was no significant (P > or = 0.05) difference in average daily gain between the TULA and FLOR groups. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in the overall distributions of quality grade and yield grade between the experimental groups; however, a significantly (P < 0.05) higher proportion of carcasses in the TULA group graded yield grade USDA-4 as compared with the FLOR group. In the economic analysis, the benefits observed resulted in an economic advantage of $52.50 USD/animal in the TULA group due to lower first UF relapse and overall mortality rates, even though the occurrence of yield grade USDA-4 carcasses increased and the initial UF treatment cost was higher.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/drug therapy , Animals , Cattle , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Nebraska , Pasteurellosis, Pneumonic/mortality , Recurrence , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Weight Gain
7.
Vet Ther ; 7(3): 257-74, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17039449

ABSTRACT

The relative effect of metaphylactic ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) versus metaphylactic tilmicosin was evaluated in beef calves under commercial feedlot conditions in Nebraska. At feedlot arrival, 11,605 animals at ultrahigh risk of developing bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were allocated to one of three experimental groups: CCFA-3 (6.6 mg/kg SC), CCFA-7 (6.6 mg/kg), or TILM-3 (tilmicosin, 10 mg/kg SC). Animals were eligible for subsequent BRD treatment 3 (CCFA-3 and TILM-3 groups) or 7 (CCFA-7 group) days later. Compared with the TILM-3 group, overall chronicity, overall mortality, BRD mortality, and metabolic mortality rates were significantly (P < .05) lower in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups; average daily gain was significantly (P < .05) higher in the CCFA-3 group; the proportion of quality grade No Roll carcasses was significantly (P < .05) lower in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups; and there were per-animal advantages of 22.05 dollars and 18.98 dollars in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups, respectively. In beef calves at ultrahigh risk of developing BRD, it is more cost effective to administer metaphylactic CCFA than tilmicosin at feedlot arrival.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/drug therapy , Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex/prevention & control , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Animals , Cattle , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/pharmacology , Male , Random Allocation , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/pharmacology
8.
Can Vet J ; 45(3): 218-24, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15072193

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted in Alberta to determine the seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in feedlot calves purchased from various auction markets throughout western Canada. Four feedlots (1 feedlot from each of the Airdrie and High River areas and 2 feedlots from the Strathmore area) were selected for sampling. At each feedlot, a random 10% sample of feedlot steer and bull calves entering the feedlot from September 2001 to December 2001 were enrolled in the study until there were a maximum of 500 animals enrolled per feedlot. Blood samples were collected from 1976 male animals at the time of entry to the 4 study feedlots. The animals represented 375 groups purchased from 70 sale points throughout British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Of the 1976 animals tested, 128 animals tested positive for antibodies to N. caninum. The prevalence and adjusted 95% confidence limits for N. caninum in beef calves on entrance to the feedlot in western Canada were 6.5% (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.2). There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) associations between the risk of treatment, the risk of designation as "chronic," and the risk of death and antibodies to N. caninum either before or after adjusting for feedlot, entry weight, entry date, and clustering of disease within lots at each feedlot. In addition, there was no significant (P > or = 0.05) association between serological status and feedlot entry weight or average daily gain. Note that there was no information available on feed conversion because the calves were mixed within existing commercial feedlot pens and the actual feed intake of each animal could not be determined. Adjustment for the concentration of antibodies to bovine viral diarrhea virus on arrival did not change any of the examined associations between N. caninum status and calf health or performance. The results of this study demonstrated that the prevalence of N. caninum in feedlot calves in western Canada was less than the prevalence reported in the United States. Additional studies are required to determine whether the inferior rate of gain and feed efficiency observed in the southern United States with animals testing positive for antibodies to N. caninum also occurs under the management conditions used in western Canada.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Neospora/immunology , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/blood , Coccidiosis/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Male , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Weight Gain
9.
Can Vet J ; 44(1): 43-50, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12619555

ABSTRACT

A field study was conducted under commercial feedlot conditions at 2 sites in western Canada to determine the relative effects of a univalent viral vaccine (MLV 1) program versus a multivalent viral vaccine (MLV 4) program on animal health; feedlot performance; and carcass characteristic variables of fall-placed, auction market derived, feedlot calves. Five thousand one hundred and sixty-three calves were processed and randomly allocated to 1 of 2 experimental groups as follows: MLV 1, which received a modified live infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) virus vaccine upon arrival at the feedlot and again at approximately 70 days on feed (DOF); or MLV 4, which received a modified live IBR virus, parainfluenza-3 virus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine upon arrival at the feedlot and again at approximately 70 DOF. A total of 20 pens (10 pens at the site located near High River, Alberta and 10 pens at the site located near Vegreville, Alberta) were allocated to the study. On both a live and carcass weight basis, final weight, weight gain, and average daily gain (ADG) were significantly (P < 0.05) improved in the MLV 4 group as compared with the MLV 1 group. However, there were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in DOF, daily dry matter intake, dry matter intake to gain ratio (DM:G) live, or DM:G carcass between the experimental groups. In addition, there were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences between the experimental groups in any of the carcass characteristic variables measured. The initial undifferentiated fever (UF) treatment rate was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the MLV 4 group as compared with the MLV 1 group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in the other measures of health between the experimental groups. In the economic analysis, there was a net advantage of $0.74 CDN per animal in the MLV 4 group as compared with the MLV 1 group due to lower initial UF treatment and improved ADG, even though the cost of the vaccine program was higher in the MLV 4 group.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle/growth & development , Herpesvirus 1, Bovine/immunology , Vaccination/veterinary , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Alberta , Animals , Body Constitution , Body Weight , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/immunology , Eating , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/veterinary , Male , Parainfluenza Virus 3, Bovine/immunology , Random Allocation , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Bovine/immunology , Vaccination/economics , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/economics , Vaccines, Combined/immunology , Viral Vaccines/economics , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Weight Gain
10.
Can Vet J ; 43(5): 355-62, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12001501

ABSTRACT

Two replicated-pen field studies were performed under commercial feedlot conditions in western Canada to compare the administration of long-acting oxytetracycline at 30 mg/kg body weight (BW) versus tilmicosin at 10 mg/kg BW to feedlot calves upon arrival at the feedlot. Ten thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine, recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred beef steer and bull calves were randomly allocated upon arrival at the feedlot to one of 2 experimental groups as follows: oxytetracycline, which received intramuscular long-acting oxytetracycline (300 mg/mL formulation) at a rate of 30 mg/kg BW; or tilmicosin, which received subcutaneous tilmicosin (300 mg/mL formulation) at a rate of 10 mg/kg BW. There were 20 pens in each experimental group. In Study 1 and in the combined analysis, the initial undifferentiated fever (UF) treatment rate was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the oxytetracycline group as compared with the tilmicosin group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in first UF relapse, second UF relapse, third UF relapse, overall chronicity, overall rail, overall mortality, bovine respiratory disease (BRD) mortality, hemophilosis mortality, arthritis mortality, or miscellaneous mortality rates between the experimental groups in either study or in the combined analysis. In addition, there were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in initial weight, final weight, weight gain, days on feed, daily dry matter intake, average daily gain, or the dry matter intake to gain ratio between the experimental groups in either study or in the combined analyses. In the economic analysis, there was a net economic advantage of $5.22 CDN per animal in the oxytetracycline group, due to a lower prophylactic cost, even though the UF therapeutic cost was higher.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Macrolides , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Tylosin/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Body Weight/drug effects , Cattle , Costs and Cost Analysis , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Male , Oxytetracycline/economics , Random Allocation , Treatment Outcome , Tylosin/economics
11.
Can Vet J ; 43(12): 940-5, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12561688

ABSTRACT

A field trial was performed under commercial feedlot conditions in western Canada to compare the efficacy of a new formulation of long-acting oxytetracycline (LA 30) to a standard long-acting oxytetracycline formulation (LA 20) and florfenicol (FLOR) for the treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in calves that received metaphylactic tilmicosin upon arrival at the feed-lot. Seven hundred and ninety-seven recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred, beef calves suffering from UF were allocated to 1 of 3 experimental groups as follows: LA 30, which received intramuscular long-acting oxytetracycline (300 mg/mL formulation) at the rate of 30 mg/kg body weight (BW) at the time of allocation; LA 20, which received intramuscular long-acting oxytetracycline (200 mg/mL formulation) at the rate of 20 mg/kg BW at the time of allocation; or FLOR, which received intramuscular florfenicol administered at the rate of 20 mg/kg BW at the time of allocation and again 48 hours later. Two hundred and sixty-six animals were allocated to the LA 30 group, 265 animals were allocated to the LA 20 group, and 266 animals were allocated to the FLOR group. The relative efficacy of the LA 30 group, as compared with the LA 20 and FLOR groups, was assessed by comparing relapse, chronicity, wastage, and mortality rates. The overall mortality (RR = 0.50) rate in the LA 30 group was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the LA 20 group. However, the overall chronicity (RR = 2.56) and overall wastage (RR = 6.97) rates of the LA 30 group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in the LA 20 group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in UF relapse rates or cause specific mortality rates between the LA 30 and LA 20 groups. In the economic analysis, there was an advantage of $28.59 CDN per animal in the LA 30 group compared with the LA 20 group. The overall chronicity (RR = 2.25) and overall wastage (RR = 2.80) rates of the LA 30 group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the FLOR group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in UF relapse rates, overall mortality rates, or cause specific mortality rates between the LA 30 and FLOR groups. In the economic analysis, there was an advantage of $12.90 CDN per animal in the LA 30 group compared with the FLOR group. In summary, the results of this study indicate that it is more cost-effective to use a new formulation of long-acting oxytetracycline (300 mg/mL formulation administered at a rate of 30 mg/kg BW) than a standard long-acting oxytetracycline formulation (200 mg/mL formulation administered at a rate of 20 mg/kg BW) or florfenicol for the treatment of UF in feedlot calves that have previously received metaphylactic tilmicosin upon arrival at the feedlot.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Fever/veterinary , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Canada , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/mortality , Chronic Disease , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/economics , Fever/mortality , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Oxytetracycline/economics , Oxytetracycline/pharmacology , Random Allocation , Recurrence , Thiamphenicol/economics , Thiamphenicol/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...