Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 337: 115952, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723408

ABSTRACT

Our aim is to review and perform a meta-analysis on the role of impulsivity in fatal suicide behaviour. We included papers who used psychological autopsy methodology, assessed adult death by suicide, and included assessment of impulsivity. We excluded papers about assisted suicide, terrorist suicide, or other cause of death other than suicide or postmortem diagnosis made only from medical records or database. 97 articles were identified. 33 were included in the systematic review and nine in the meta-analysis. We found that people who die by suicide with high impulsivity are associated with younger age, substance abuse, and low intention to die, whereas those with low impulsivity were associated with older age, depression, schizophrenia, high intention to die and low social support. In the meta-analysis, suicide cases had higher impulsivity scores than living controls (Hedges' g = 0.59, 95 % CI [0.28, 0.89], p=.002). However, studies showed heterogeneity (Q = 90.86, p<.001, I2=89.0 %). Impulsivity-aggressiveness interaction was assessed through meta-regression (ß=0.447, p=.045). Individuals with high impulsivity would be exposed to a higher risk of fatal suicide behaviour, aggressiveness would play a mediating role. People who die by suicide with high and low impulsivity display distinct characteristics, which may reflect different endophenotypes leading to suicide by different pathways.


Subject(s)
Impulsive Behavior , Suicide , Humans , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Suicide/psychology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Autopsy , Aggression/psychology
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38008184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Losing a patient by suicide may lead to psychological distress and mid/long-term personal and professional consequences for psychiatrists, becoming second victims. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The validated Spanish version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E) questionnaire and a 30-item questionnaire created ad-hoc was administered online to psychiatrists from all over Spain to evaluate how patient suicide affects mental health professionals. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine psychiatrists participated in the survey, and 256 completed the SVEST-E questionnaire. The results of the SVEST-E questionnaire revealed a negative impact of suicide on emotional and physical domains, although this seemed not to lead to work absenteeism. Most respondents desired peer support from a respected colleague and considered institutional support, although desirable, lacking. Almost 70% of surveyed stated that an employee assistance program providing free counseling to employees outside of work would be desirable. The ad-hoc questionnaire showed that up to 88% of respondents considered some suicides unavoidable, and 76% considered the suicide unexpected. Almost 60% of respondents reported no changes in the approach of patients with suicidal ideation/behavior, after losing a patient. However, up to 76% reported performing more detailed clinical evaluations and notes in the medical record. Up to 13% of respondents considered leaving or changing their job or advancing retirement after losing a patient by suicide. CONCLUSIONS: After a patient's suicide, psychiatrists often suffer the feelings of second victim, impacting personal and professional areas. The study results indicate the need for postvention strategies to mitigate the negative impact of patient suicide.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979784

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Psychological autopsy methods often include measures of impulsivity and aggression. The aim is to assess their reliability and validity in a Spanish sample. METHODS: Cross-sectional web-based survey was fulfilled by 184 proband and proxy pairs. Data was collected on sociodemographic characteristics, impulsivity through Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), aggression through Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), and history of suicide ideation. Proxies filled out BIS-11, BPAQ and suicide ideation with the responses they would expect from the probands. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between proband and proxies. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the predictive validity of proxy reports in predicting probands' suicide ideation. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis showed differences in BPAQ (Median 68 vs. 62; p=0.001), but not in BIS-11 (p>.050). BIS-11 showed good concordance (ICC=0.754; CI 95% 0.671-0.816) and BPAQ acceptable (ICC=0.592; CI 95% 0.442-0.699). In the probands regression model BPAQ predicted suicide ideation (OR 1.038; CI 95% 1.016-1.061) but not BIS-11 (OR 0.991; CI 95% 0.958-1.025). In the proxy-report model BPAQ also predicted probands' suicide ideation (OR 1.036; CI 95% 1.014-1.058) but not BIS-11 (OR 0.973; CI 95% 0.942-1.004). CONCLUSION: Used as proxy-reported assessment tools, BIS-11 showed better reliability than the BPAQ. However, both showed validity in Spanish population and could be included in psychological autopsy protocols.

5.
Ann Gen Psychiatry ; 22(1): 35, 2023 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37689691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with depression refuse treatment. Moreover, suicide attempters often display low perceived need of treatment and impaired decision-making. These observations raise questions about the capacity to treatment consent in depressed suicide attempters (SA). METHODS: In patients with current depressive episode (N = 33 SAs and N = 27 non-SAs), consent capacity was evaluated with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), insight with the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, and depression severity with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). RESULTS: The median BDI score in the whole sample (N = 60) was 21 [10;36], and was higher in SAs than non-SAs (27 [11;36] vs. 15 [10:33], p < 0.001). Consent capacity was impaired in 30% (appreciation), 53% (reasoning) and 60% (understanding) of all patients. MacCAT-T sub-scores were lower in SAs than non-SAs (understanding: 4.4 [2.35;5.8] vs. 5.3 [3.13;6]); appreciation: 3 [1;4] vs. 4 [2;4]); reasoning (4 [1;7] vs. 7 [3;8]), and ability to express a choice: 1 [0;2] vs. 2 [0;2]; all p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, suicide attempt history and depression severity (but not insight) were negatively associated with MacCAT-T sub-scores. CONCLUSION: More research is needed on the capacity to consent to treatment of patients with depression, particularly suicidal individuals, to make informed choices about their treatment. Trial registration The Montpellier University Hospital Institutional Review Board approved the study (No. 202100714).

6.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 84(3)2023 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37074296

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine suicide rates in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic and the influenza pandemic of 1918-1920.Methods: Data on deaths by cause for the periods 1910-1925 and 2016-2020 were obtained from the National Statistics Institute of Spain.Results: During the Spanish influenza pandemic, a peak of deaths in 1918 due to influenza, acute bronchitis, pneumonia, and other respiratory diseases coincided with an increase in suicides (from 5.9 in 1917 to 6.6 per 100,000 population in 1918). The pattern was repeated in the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020, with an increase in suicides from 7.8 in 2019 to 8.3 per 100,000 population in 2020. In both cases, the male:female suicide ratio was reduced in similar proportion, with a higher net increase in the number of suicides among males but a higher percentage increase among females.Conclusions: Albeit limited, there is evidence that the pandemics may have affected suicide rates. However, the effect was most likely due to precipitation of different diathesis-stressor factors in each setting, given the different historical contexts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919 , Influenza, Human , Suicide , Humans , Male , Female , History, 20th Century , Spain/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 321: 115057, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The exact mechanisms through which the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic could influence the prevalence of suicidal thoughts are not yet known, both in the general population and in health workers. The objectives of the present study are to determine the prevalence of suicidal thoughts in the physician population and to detect sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with presenting suicidal thoughts during the first wave of COVID-19. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study via an online survey distributed in Spain in June 2020 via 52 Official Medical Associations. The sample is made up of all practicing and registered physicians in Spain (3,140 of the 270,235 registered physicians in Spain). An online questionnaire which included sociodemographic, professional and work variables, variables related to the pandemic, work data in relation to COVID-19 and clinical variables (medical-psychiatric history and previous suicidal behaviour) was distributed. RESULTS: In our sample, the prevalence of serious suicidal thoughts was 6.31% and up to 17.32% of the subjects reported thoughts about killing themselves during the pandemic. Being female (Exp (B)= 1.989, p=0.001), presence of previous suicide attempts (Exp(B)= 6.127, p=<0.001), taking a psychotropic drug (Exp(B)= 2.470, p=<0.001) and working in a different area during the pandemic (Exp(B)= 1.751, p= 0.037) were associated with a higher risk of suicidal ideation. Cohabiting was a protective factor in the development of suicidal ideation although not in all our measures (Exp(B)=0.940, p=0.850 Vs Exp (B)= 0.620, p=0.018). LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of this study is its cross-sectional nature, which prevents establishing a causal relationship. As a strength, it stands out that it is a large sample of the population studied and in a particularly complex context of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Suicidal thoughts among the Spanish registered physician population during the pandemic is high and mainly associated with socio-demographic factors, clinical mental health variables, and aspects of job satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Physicians , Humans , Female , Male , Suicidal Ideation , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Burnout, Professional/psychology
8.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 24(1): 1-10, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080711

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been numerous social changes to try to ​​contain the spread of the disease. These sudden changes in daily life have also changed the way we relate to others, in addition to creating a climate of uncertainty and fear. Therefore, the objective of this review is to compile published data of the consequences of suicidal behavior in the first months from the onset of the pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The analysis reflects a concern about issues related to suicide since the beginning of the pandemic. A large number of online surveys have been released and have provided data on relatively large populations. The percentage of the population with suicidal ideation in that period seems to be approximately 5-15%. Many studies associate suicidal ideation with being young, female, and presence of sleep problems. Surveys of healthcare workers do not seem to indicate a higher prevalence of suicidal ideation compared to the general population. The incidence of suicide attempts seen in emergency departments did not seem to change, while the number of visits for other issues, unrelated to suicide, did decrease. The few studies on completed suicide do not indicate an increase in incidence in these first 6 months since March 2020, when the WHO declared the start of the pandemic. It does not seem that there have been major changes in the figures related to suicidal behavior in the studies from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, although it is still too early to know the consequences it will have long term. The social and economic damages resulting from the pandemic will certainly take a long time to recover.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Suicidal Ideation , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Suicide, Attempted
9.
Rev. esp. med. legal ; 48(1)Enero - Marzo 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-206858

ABSTRACT

La denigración de un progenitor por el otro es uno de los efectos más dañinos para el menor en situaciones de ruptura familiar, si bien el llamado síndrome de alienación parental (Gardner) como supuesto trastorno mental infantil, no ha obtenido la aceptación en las clasificaciones psiquiátricas internacionales, ni la necesaria validez y soporte científico, por lo que profesionales de la salud mental, peritos y juristas deberían evitar su empleo. En su lugar, cabe valerse de los criterios diagnósticos contemplados por las clasificaciones psiquiátricas diagnósticas internacionales que describimos. Es esencial establecer el diagnóstico diferencial a partir del síntoma del rechazo hacia un progenitor, cuestión que entraña dificultad y que puede requerir el concurso de un equipo multidisciplinar para valorar adecuadamente todos los aspectos evaluables. Los profesionales han de obrar con conocimiento de los límites de su ciencia, aportando aquellos datos y conclusiones que sean legítimos y válidos según tal premisa. (AU)


The denigration of one parent by the other would be one of the most damaging effects for the child in situations of family breakdown, although the so-called parental alienation syndrome (Gardner) as a supposed childhood mental disorder, has not obtained acceptance in psychiatric classifications nor the necessary validity and scientific support, so its use by mental health professionals, experts and lawyers should be avoided. Instead, one can use the diagnostic criteria contemplated by the international diagnostic psychiatric classifications that we describe. It is essential to establish the differential diagnosis based on the symptom of rejection of a parent, an issue that involves difficulty and may require the assistance of a multidisciplinary team to adequately evaluate all the evaluable aspects. Professionals must act with knowledge of the limits of their science, providing those data and conclusions that are legitimate and valid according to this premise. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Gardner Syndrome/diagnosis , Divorce/psychology , Child Abuse , Family Conflict , Forensic Medicine , Forensic Psychiatry
10.
Suicide Life Threat Behav ; 50(2): 449-460, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31724765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between suicide in men and stratified measures of religiosity. METHODS: We studied 192 suicides and 81 controls (nonsuicide, sudden, or accidental death). We employed the psychological autopsy method to compile diagnoses based on DSM-IV criteria. Overall, religiosity and participation in religious associations were determined using a Likert-type scale. Given the limited participation of women in the religious associations of southern Spain, only male subjects were included. RESULTS: Religious participants had decreased risk of suicide compared to nonparticipants (OR = 0.148, 95% CI = 0.049-0.447). This lower risk was further associated with the degree of involvement in religious activity. Suicides accounted for 73.47% of subjects with no religious participation, 61.17% of those with some participation, and 56.52% of frequent participants (linear trend test Z = -2.0329, p = .042). Membership in a religious association was also associated with a lower rate of suicide compared to nonmembers (OR = 0.356, 95% CI = 0.172-0.736). This effect was similarly associated with the degree of involvement in the association. Suicides accounted for 74.67% of subjects who never participated in the activities of a religious association, 69.23% of those who sometimes participated, and 42.86% of frequent participants (linear trend test Z = -3.4082, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Religiosity, either as general participation or through a religious association, was associated with protection against suicide proportional to the degree of involvement in religious activities.


Subject(s)
Suicide , Female , Humans , Male , Religion , Religion and Psychology , Risk , Spain/epidemiology
11.
Rev. esp. med. legal ; 45(2): 67-72, abr.-jun. 2019.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-188602

ABSTRACT

El suicidio constituye un importante problema de salud pública. La mortalidad por suicidio, la calidad de las estadísticas y su validez son un elemento crucial en su monitorización y prevención. En este artículo pretendemos realizar una actualización de las aportaciones de la medicina forense a la conducta suicida, destacando la importancia de las fuentes forenses en el conocimiento de los factores de riesgo así como la participación de Institutos de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses en programas de prevención del suicidio. Hemos querido señalar las distintas colaboraciones del Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses con especialistas del ámbito de la psiquiatría y también de la salud pública que han permitido desarrollar un modelo integrativo de investigación de la conducta suicida dirigidas a conocer con precisión los datos relativos a las muertes por suicidio, estandarizar la investigación en suicidio y elaborar estrategias de prevención suicida efectivas frente a una causa de mortalidad prevenible


Suicide is an important public health problem. Suicide mortality, and the quality and reliability of suicide statistics are key points in monitoring and preventing suicidal behaviours. The objective of this paper is to review the contribution of forensic medicine to suicidal behaviour, to underline the importance of forensic sources to investigate risk factors, and to highlight the role of Institutes of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences in suicide prevention programmes. We describe the collaboration between Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences and specialists in the fields of psychiatry and public health. This collaborative work has facilitated the development of an integrative model in the investigation of suicidal behaviour allowing more precise suicide mortality data, the standardisation of research on suicide, and the development of suicide prevention strategies to reduce a preventable cause of death


Subject(s)
Humans , Suicide/prevention & control , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Forensic Medicine/methods , Forensic Psychology/methods , Risk Factors
18.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment ; 7(3): 139-146, jul.-sept. 2014.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-125236

ABSTRACT

Fundamento y objetivo. Para poder prevenir el suicidio es necesario conocer su magnitud. Hay discrepancias entre las cifras de suicidios en estudios realizados con médicos forenses y las obtenidas a través del Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Este trabajo pretende comprobar si los datos del INE coinciden o difieren con los registrados por los organismos encargados de la realización de autopsias médico-legales en España (Institutos de Medicina Legal [IML]). Método. Se solicitó a los directores de IML el número de suicidios en un periodo de 5 años (2006-2010) y se comparó con los ofrecidos por el INE en su sede virtual. Se calcularon las tasas de suicidio según ambas fuentes. Resultados. El número total de suicidios según el INE fue menor al obtenido directamente por los IML en todos los años. Con la cifra de suicidio registrado por provincia y año más alta, ya fuera de los IML o del INE, se obtuvo la cifra de casos de suicidio identificados (NSI) y que por algún motivo no quedaron registrados en una u otra entidad. Las cifras de NSI indicaban una tasa media de suicidios por 100.000 habitantes 0,97 (DE: 0,10) más alta que la que señalaba el INE, con una pérdida media de 443,86 (DE: 46,72) casos registrados cada año. Se discuten los posibles factores que influyen en esta pérdida de casos registrados. Conclusiones. Según los resultados obtenidos, existe una discrepancia entre INE e IML sobre el número de suicidios en España sin que ninguna de las fuentes consultadas pueda considerarse más fiable (AU)


Background and objectives. To be able to prevent suicides, The exact magnitude of suicides must be known in order to prevent them. There is evidence that data provided on the number of suicides by the Spanish Statistical Office (Instituto Nacional de Estadística [INE]) differs from that identified by forensic pathologists. This paper aims to determine whether the INE data are to the same as those recorded by the agencies responsible for conducting autopsies in Spain (IML), and calculate the number of missing cases. Method. IML were requested to provide the number of suicides in a five year period (2006-2010) and this was compared with those offered by INE in its site. A new rate of suicides per 100,000 was obtained and used to calculate the number of suicides in Spain. Results. For every year of the studied period, the number of suicides reported by the INE was lower than that obtained directly from the IML. Using the highest annual suicide rate registered by province and the total, a count was obtained of identified suicides that for some reason had not been recorded in the INE or the IML data. Based on these figures, the mean rate of suicides per 100,000 was 0.97 (SD 0.10) higher than official INE data, which indicates a mean loss of 443.86 (SD 46.72) cases reported each year. Possible factors that may influence the missing recorded cases are discussed. Conclusions. According to the results, there is a discrepancy between INE and IML about the number of suicides in Spain. Neither of the two sources can be considered more reliable than the other (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Suicide/legislation & jurisprudence , Suicide/prevention & control , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/legislation & jurisprudence , Suicide, Attempted/prevention & control , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiological Monitoring/organization & administration , Epidemiological Monitoring/standards , Forensic Psychiatry/methods , Forensic Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/trends , Suicide, Attempted/trends , Spain/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Forensic Psychiatry/ethics , Forensic Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Forensic Psychiatry/standards , Helsinki Declaration
19.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 142 Suppl 2: 24-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913750

ABSTRACT

The use of physical and pharmacological restraint is controversial but is currently accepted as inevitable. It is indicated for controlling behavioral disorders and psychomotor agitation that put patients and third parties at risk. Its indication should be medical, and we should opt for the least restrictive measure. Restraints represent a possible infringement of patients' fundamental rights and require understanding and strict respect for the medical-legal precepts by physicians and other practitioners involved in its application. This article reviews the current legal framework, as well as the medical-legal premises and aspects of applying restraints, with the objective of ensuring maximum respect for patients' rights and the appropriate legal safety in the activity of practitioners.


Subject(s)
Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Restraint, Physical/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Control, Formal/methods , Tranquilizing Agents/adverse effects , Coercion , Dangerous Behavior , Europe , Humans , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychomotor Agitation , Restraint, Physical/adverse effects , Restraint, Physical/instrumentation , Restraint, Physical/methods , Safety , Spain , Torture , Violence
20.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment ; 7(3): 139-46, 2014.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To be able to prevent suicides, The exact magnitude of suicides must be known in order to prevent them. There is evidence that data provided on the number of suicides by the Spanish Statistical Office (Instituto Nacional de Estadística [INE]) differs from that identified by forensic pathologists. This paper aims to determine whether the INE data are to the same as those recorded by the agencies responsible for conducting autopsies in Spain (IML), and calculate the number of missing cases. METHOD: IML were requested to provide the number of suicides in a five year period (2006-2010) and this was compared with those offered by INE in its site. A new rate of suicides per 100,000 was obtained and used to calculate the number of suicides in Spain. RESULTS: For every year of the studied period, the number of suicides reported by the INE was lower than that obtained directly from the IML. Using the highest annual suicide rate registered by province and the total, a count was obtained of identified suicides that for some reason had not been recorded in the INE or the IML data. Based on these figures, the mean rate of suicides per 100,000 was 0.97 (SD 0.10) higher than official INE data, which indicates a mean loss of 443.86 (SD 46.72) cases reported each year. Possible factors that may influence the missing recorded cases are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, there is a discrepancy between INE and IML about the number of suicides in Spain. Neither of the two sources can be considered more reliable than the other.


Subject(s)
Records , Registries , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Forensic Medicine , Humans , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...